I like how you linked to Mark Passio. That dude knows quite a bit of esoteric stuff. I've seen his entire 8hr Natural Law video and learned a lot. I don't agree with him 100%, like the following:
We must become vegan b/c eating meat is bad karma
He's buddy-buddy with FBI/Russian agent Adam Kokesh
I personally wouldn't touch tarot cards with a 10ft pole
If you want some HIGH-DOSE conspiracy truth, I recommend you check out whistleblower Donald Marshall.
They do dismiss it. I think her theory is also disinfo to distract from nuclear 9/11. We explain why we don't buy the other theories in the podcast video.
Thanks for sharing this @timthevagabond. Reading all the info at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth really opened my eyes. It's also made me leery of all this hype surrounding the 28 pages... it seems like a false flag to justify war with Saudi Arabia. Heck, it's already full of U.S. military bases "thanks" to the Petrodollar deal. It's really starting to smell like WWIII... :(
No problem. This info is extremely important to get out there, especially if it is tried again. I would say though that architects and engineers do not entertain this theory of nuclear devices being used, which concerns me and makes me question their legitimacy in upper management. Zerohedge though released a good article I linked in the sources pointing to the same premise as me that it was subterranean thermo-nuclear devices.
Thermo-nuclear devices wasn't something I'd read or heard about before this post today so thank you. Watching the video with tests of subterranean detonations definitely shows it's a possible explanation for what happened that day :(
I like how you linked to Mark Passio. That dude knows quite a bit of esoteric stuff. I've seen his entire 8hr Natural Law video and learned a lot. I don't agree with him 100%, like the following:
If you want some HIGH-DOSE conspiracy truth, I recommend you check out whistleblower Donald Marshall.
Dr. Judy has always intrigued me, she makes a pretty good case. Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth dismiss her theory don't they?
They do dismiss it. I think her theory is also disinfo to distract from nuclear 9/11. We explain why we don't buy the other theories in the podcast video.
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Thanks for sharing this @timthevagabond. Reading all the info at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth really opened my eyes. It's also made me leery of all this hype surrounding the 28 pages... it seems like a false flag to justify war with Saudi Arabia. Heck, it's already full of U.S. military bases "thanks" to the Petrodollar deal. It's really starting to smell like WWIII... :(
No problem. This info is extremely important to get out there, especially if it is tried again. I would say though that architects and engineers do not entertain this theory of nuclear devices being used, which concerns me and makes me question their legitimacy in upper management. Zerohedge though released a good article I linked in the sources pointing to the same premise as me that it was subterranean thermo-nuclear devices.
Thermo-nuclear devices wasn't something I'd read or heard about before this post today so thank you. Watching the video with tests of subterranean detonations definitely shows it's a possible explanation for what happened that day :(