RE: Just As Intended: The U.S. Election Is Tearing Us To Shreds - by Suzie Dawson
That's not a reply. Stop dodging the tough questions. That's what shills, actors and deceived people do. No disrespect intended.
Assange is on record supporting the offical 9/11 findings. His links to George Soros before Wikileaks launched. His silence on the Federal Reserve and central banking racket that has enslaved humanity. His relationships with MSM. His work with NASA & DARPA and his links to an Australian Cult called The Family.
If Assange wanted to bring every Govt in the world to it's knees he would blow the lid on 9/11, the Fed and central banks, and Israel. He hasn't done it and I suspect that he won't - unless his handlers tell him otherwise.
Humanity is enslaved by the Fed and the manufactured War on Terror and the net is tightening day by day yet Assange is completely silent. These two revelations would change society forever and Assange knows it but he does nothing about it, just like the other shills.
If you are being honest with yourself you will ask yourself why Assange is silent on the most important issues - the issues that could bring down the Deep State quicker than almost any other issue.
Instead, he gives them some Podesta and Clinton emails instead and get Trump into office so that we can keep the masses attention away from the real issues - that's Assange's job and he's very good at it!
I'm not here to troll. I have better things to do. I made my point in the hope that you were open (without knowing how you'd respond) but you aren't open and that's your prerogative. Thanks for the chat. It's ok to disagree, it doesn't mean that I disrespect your work or other things that you may write about. It's just that we are miles apart on this one!
Sorry but the things you say are just completely ridiculous and largely unsourced.
The MSM beats the shit out of Assange and WikiLeaks every single day. The idea that you try to associate with him with an MSM agenda, when the Guardian completely betrayed WikiLeaks and has been smearing them for years (James Ball, Luke Harding & co in particular), the New York Times leaked WikiLeaks publication schedule to the US government, and the major TV channels give airtime to people saying that he should be droned to death etc etc
WikiLeaks has repeatedly called out MSM complicity with US intelligence agencies
According to the MSM Assange is a treasonous fascistic child-molesting serial rapist.
By smearing him, you are actually serving the same interests that the MSM are, whether you realise it or not.
The fact (unconfirmed) that some of his childhood, which was known to be transient (which is not a crime) was spent in a commune, has nothing to do whatsoever with the actual documents WikiLeaks publish.
The fact that you don't understand who Bill Binney actually is (Binning?!??) or what he did at NSA is pretty remarkable.
You accuse Assange of being Zionist-aligned when the only reason I know that Israeli security agencies purchased directed energy weapons from US weapons manufacturers is FROM THE WIKILEAKS FILES
You accuse me of not wanting to know the truth but what I asked in my responses for you to do was to actually read the Decipher You series which has uncovered dozens of never-before-published-by-MSM findings from the Snowden files which are of critical importance and significance. You didn't bother.
I also linked you to our You Tube series where you can watch us studying the source documents in real time. You didn't bother.
Yet you are totally prepared to waste time ranting on here. Not much of a truther, dude. Truthers do the work, do the reading, view everything available, and then make conclusions.
They don't just smear whistleblowers and journalists on erroneous "Whataboutism" pretexts - they STUDY THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS.
You should try it :)
Study this source:
Assange said that 9/11 was a false conspiracy.
Here is the quote:
Source: Belfast Telegraph, July 19, 2010
Wikileaks & Assange - Hero or Dis-Info Agent? (Part 1)
Please don't accuse me of not studying while it is you refuse to look at the evidence that I gave you 14 hours ago. It's very hypocritical.