Banned on Youtube: El Paso Witness Says She Saw 3/4 Shooters - Not 1. This is A Repeated Theme in Multiple US Shootings.

in #threespeak5 years ago (edited)

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


There is a repeated theme in large scale shootings in the US where the 'official narrative' describes a single 'lone wolf' shooter, but points of evidence show multiple un-named shooters. In this video I go over some testimony from the day in El Paso where an eye witness describes seeing 3/4 men dressed in black shooting - not one single shooter as has been claimed.
The Walmart store is likely covered in cameras, yet we have almost no footage of the event - just a couple of grainy shots.
Why would people at so many shootings describe seeing multiple men in black if there was only one (possibly not even dressed in black)? This happened at Sandy Hook, the Aurora cinema shooting and others too.
On top of all of this, the Youtube policies now specifically include a clause that states that discussing this kind of evidence and possibility can get you banned! Welcome to the 'free' world - where truth is what you are told it is.

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul


▶️ 3Speak

Sort:  

disgusting really that so many are still asleep
guess they will half to eliminate at least half of us before the masses wake themselves up
good post
cheers urasoul

I know you think all numbers are a shit and there is nothing to it but I don't care. From the El Paso shooting to the Outside Lands Park in San Francisco, where Paul Simon (500, connecting to Leonardo's 2019 Phoenix Theme) sing Bridge over Troubled Water on 8/11, are 1001 Miles. 101 is terrorist and assassin.

From El Paso shooting 38 83 to Outside Lands San Francisco 1001 miles.jpg

Isis Propaganda:

Isis Warning before 811 equals 1180.jpg

1180 Isis Warning before 811.png

Isis Warning before 811 about San Francisco, New York and London.png

118 San Francisco, New York, London.PNG

I am pretty sure I have never said there is nothing to the number codes - I think I just said that I would like to see full statistical analysis done on them, that's all. My main issue with research into the unknown is to be clear about what is being assumed and to ideally not make any assumptions at all.
I'm not clear what you are pointing to as connecting El Paso to the Outside Lands park - how are these two locations related?

I am expecting a shooting on August 9-11 in the Outside Lands Music and Arts festival in San Francisco, next to the Golden Gate Bridge.

That would suck, but it wouldn't surprise me.

I see, ok - we shall see!

Yeah, we will. Probably a nothing-burger. If next weekend comes and goes without major incident, I will be relieved and stop writing about numbers for the rest of my life.

Witness accounts are often very unreliable. You can't really rely on them to get the story right.

As to there not being much video out there, it's just a matter of what they have released to the news media and the public so far. There might be a ton of footage. But they aren't going to digitize that and release it to the public.

That in itself is a bit disappointing. While I'm sure the friends and family of the victims don't want to be reminded of this, and many probably don't want to see it, there is a question as to public knowledge. What is the advantage to keeping all these things secret? Shouldn't the people be allowed to see it and know?

As to the censorship on social media...I know why they did it. There was a bunch of conspiracy theories about other mass shootings. A lot of people didn't like it. Of course, part of this is because they don't release so much. They keep a lot of footage under wraps. These could be exactly as they say...but there's even just the possibility that something could be wrong...and you couldn't even talk about it on YouTube, or perhaps other social media. That is very concerning.

In terms of relying on witnesses - sure, people make mistakes - however, that does not mean that I ignore them. Ultimately, I was not there, so I have no choice but to go by witnesses and doing that means listening to all of them. Don't you find it a bit strange that I can list at least 4 mass shootings where witnesses said the same thing regarding clearly seeing multiple male shooters (I think always dressed in black) who were never identified? I do.

There are many people who take theories about these events to the extreme and fabricate nonsense, which doesn't help anyone. At the same time, there are well documented largescale programs designed to manipulate perception, orchestrated by those known to be behind at least MILLIONS of murders already. So I remain open to all possibilities. I sugget this book on the CIA to everyone now:
https://archive.org/details/DouglasValentineTheCIAAsOrganizedCrime2016

Don't you find it a bit strange that I can list at least 4 mass shootings where witnesses said the same thing regarding clearly seeing multiple male shooters (I think always dressed in black) who were never identified?

Absolutely...but I'm very wary to say anything conspiratorial on it, because there are people much crazier than I.

America is at a point where they either need to choose to support mental health, or start changing gun laws and increasing censorship...which is soo fucked up.

I am not a fan of guns - a balanced society has no need to kill anyone. It is absolutely clear that most regions of this planet need urgent focus into healing, balancing and evolving. We are on the verge of destruction due to imbalance and denial is at it's core.

Well, the second amendment in the United States has historical significance that's sorta been trampled upon already as it is. The second amendment grants US citizens the right to bare arms, to be a member of a militia. This is to keep the federal government's power in check. States are supposed to have militias that are made up of normal citizens.

The problem is that they have convinced everyone that we need a massive standing military, rather than a much smaller one, in addition to state and federal militias.

There have been many examples where they have trampled on the right to form a militia, causing horrendous events by raiding places that have stockpiled guns for self defense and the forming of militias.

So, Americans are supposed to have the right to bare arms to protect themselves and their area from the federal government as well as foreign invasion. But, due to how the government has grown so huge, and actually made the entire purpose of having those guns illegal, they sort of sit useless.

In addition to that, America has a huge problem with mental health. We have a completely private medical industry. Due to that, the majority can't afford to seek medical help unless they are in a dire situation, and then it may actually bankrupt them.

All these things work together to put us in this situation.

Guns are just a tool. A very basic tool. They're just a metal tube to control an explosion in order to project a hunk of metal in a certain direction. In America, that tool is supposed to be there to protect citizens against a federal government that long ago got out of control. So, there's a very real reason why they're supposed to be allowed...but they didn't really work.

I understand, yes. All governments seem to function via a monopoly on violence and so at their core they represent imbalance. This cannot produce balance, understandably. Mental/emotional/spiritual health and balance are absolutely the most important priority for everyone on Earth who intends to continue living here!

Thanks for sharing this information. I haven't came across that statement that there where multiple shooters but I remember that this pattern also was used at other occasions.

It would be good to know more about the speakers in the video to track whether or not they get more widely heard!

Sometimes, those witnesses end up dead, like in other cases of shootings.

Why would people at so many shootings describe seeing multiple men in black if there was only one (possibly not even dressed in black)?

Panicking people tend to see scary things everywhere. Especially dangerous men in black.
For example: In a shooting in Munich a lot of witnesses saw the "killer", which was just one of the policeman.

That's why many witnesses aren't useful in the courtroom - even when they don't lie on purpose.

Posted using Partiko Android

Not always the case. Sometimes people witness things that don't fit with some of the media and governments narratives. https://news.sky.com/story/las-vegas-shooting-crowd-warned-youre-all-going-to-die-11064484

Posted using Partiko Android

I wouldn't count on tons of Walmart video footage too much because most of the cams at their stores might be dummy cams which would explain why they use people to check receipts as people leave the store.

Posted using Partiko Android

Nope, not only are there hundreds of cameras in the ailes with accompanied monitors showing exactly what they see, but the reason they check receipts is because of the self checkout theft that a lot of people try by scanning one item and bagging another one. I don't know why you think they have dummy cams, their entire store has a complete perimeter security system and their loss prevention insurance more than likely stipulates the extent of their security system.

Well sadly due to the fact that everytime I used to go to the store with my brother he goes and grabs a soda and drinks it all up and never pays for it and not once has he been confronted so either they don't care or most those cams are dummy cams also seen some items locked up such as some colonge, so just more reason to believe.

Posted using Partiko Android

What do you think they can do to your brother? Try to make him pay for a soda? They can't care about what your brother does, it's so inconsequential that it probably doesn't even register to the management, and what your brother does, a lot of people do too, an entitlement of ripping off Walmart for 50 cents, but you think that them not going after your brother means you don't have to pay for anything there or that management doesn't care about shoplifting? I mean you can't tell me that the hundreds of cameras with the monitor showing what they see that are in about every single aisle are fake or aren't recording.

I don't see hundreds of monitors maybe only a few but yes lots of what appears to be cams but most likely dummy cams and the reason like I mentioned some items locked up and what you mentioned about shoplifting does point to evidence that those cams are pretty useless. Maybe if they were busting shoplifters instead depending on receipt checkers and some cops standing near by they wouldn't need receipt checkers or have to lock up various items and word would get around that... Man you can't shoplift at walmart with all them cams because you get busted quick, but sadly that's not a reality as of today. Only true.

Posted using Partiko Android

You think that what your brother does is "shoplifting"? Shoplifting is usually done at the self checkout register, which is why there's receipt checkers, but you think that they can do it with cameras? Or what, "catching" the ones drinking a soda would deter the ones who shoplifting 30x-100x more than that measly 50 cent soda? You think that security guards would do anything to deter the real shoplifters? You don't know what you're talking about, but you should probably put your suggestions in an envelope and mail them to Walmart, someone would have a chuckle-head-shake at your "ideas" and perspective.

"man you can't shoplift at the self checkout at Walmart with all these cameras AND security guards"

Sorry dude you don't have an argument and when you said 50 cent soda that tells me pretty much all I need to know about your understanding of Walmart. They do other types theft incase you haven't heard. You can go and research some vids online where people just flat out roll out loads of merchandise without paying or self check out stuff methods and receipt checkers looking like the only line of defense failed hard stopping such theivery. Not saying all Walmarts are the same but some appear to be severely lacking, and if their security was so great with many cams and even cams in the parking lots by the way then in some of those cases they wouldn't have needed to go to news stations for help.

Posted using Partiko Android

Why, you think that cameras can do anything? You think that people don't have to be watching them? You act as if they're relying on having cameras as a deterant by arguing that they are likely fake, which is ridiculous, and no less ridiculous than thinking that cameras alone mean jack shit. Who said their security was "so great"? It certainly ain't dumb as a bag of rocks like you believe. Like I said, send your suggestions to them, I'm sure they will consider them.

I don't know about Walmart, but I've worked in a few shops and they all took their camera operation pretty seriously.

Smells like False Flag...
Probably "they" wanna push
Gun Control again...

So grateful for this platform and contributors. Thank you for providing this important info. 3Speak is saving the free internet!

Posted via @threespeak. This is a comment proxy account. The comment above was written by a 3Speak user that has no Steem account yet. To learn more about 3Speak visit our blog @threespeak and our website https://3speak.online. This comment was posted through 3Speak on behalf of: https://instagram.com/nikolai.bowman

Sounds retarded, oh wait uraisoul, of course its retarded.

ad hominem attack is not a demonstration of intelligence.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64344.02
ETH 3142.36
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.01