You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: <A Restaurant by the Sea> Contest Ended: Check the Results!
I agree that we should prohibit anything which makes the competition become unfair. But now in the end of contests, I think it is too late to start doing it. If we take back the upvote of the winner in this contest, I think we should do the same thing with all of winner of previous contests. There are someones who are not aware of those rules, there are someones who are newcomers and just followed what people did in the first. And I think, right now punishing someones using voting bot can be the unfairness with those people
They have the right to ask others upvote or not. Why do you know they exchange?
When you use a BOT, you can have hundreds of votes, and you lose your balance in the competition. You can get other people to support you. In the Tasteem FAQ not to mention, in one of the top 1 there is a 1 leader with 320 upvote from the fanbase for him. he has many likes and upvote. He does not use BOT, we can not punish him.
Dont ask me how I know it. I’m now managing vietnamese comunity. I know what is going on in our community. You know it too, right? :)) as I did admit, i didn’t not know, I saw people used it and think I should do it to be fair. My bad. Lol.
Like Facebook contests or photo competitions, do you find that they go to relatives, family friends like & share? That is not prohibited, but if hack like will be banned. just like using BOT. Not to mention the fairness of Steemit, it does not exist.
do you know why some contests on fb accept you to bring people to like and share? Because their purpose is make their facebook page get more popular. Hack like will be banned because it cant bring anything for their purpose. That is point.
Turn back to the problem of tasteem. Tasteem rate posts depending on upvote and remark, and value of post. To find out the winner who has the review post that people love the most. That is tasteem purpose. That is a point.
And that is why Tasteem prohibited buying vote. because if the author buy vote, The upvotes which author got are not from the real viewers who really read it and love it. And just like facebook, tasteem should prohibit something that makes tasteem cannot get anything for their purpose. In this point. Should we prohibit exchange upvote, too?
You say buying vote needs to be prohibited, I totally agree. But you protect for exchange upvote, it doesn’t make any sense. You just protect it because you did it. I still keep my opinion that. Buying vote and exchange vote are somehow just same same each other. :))
That's just your point, are you sure that those who upvote your favorite posts do not, or they do not understand what you say, you are simply 1 AD of 1 community, just like dang007 When you run out of value or k power, you are no different from me. Agreed that your post is good and attractive, but if you say stop the upvote exchange, so why support bot @teamvn. And those who bookmark you at tasteem sure they know it or you ask them
And if I talk upvote, then I have to upvote each other, you see who I bookmark, and what is the exchange.
The best way for @tasteem is having a curator team, to rate post. Not depend on anything else, but the quality of post. In that time, i think you can not just write the suck post with few sentences, and go to exchange upvote to get high ranking. But you will need to, at least, write Good post.
Have you read my post yet, it's not just a few words, you're also coppy at FOODY, and my post is not too short :)
I said “Few sentences”. :))
And. I DID NOT copy any word from anywhere else.
:))
Ok. It will never finish. I respect your opinion. Keep it. Stop right here. No more. :))))
tôi đã thấy một bức ảnh có chữ FOODY ở trong nó. bạn đừng chối cãi. xin phép cho tôi nói tiếng việt
Show it. You know i cant edit or do anything else after 7days, right? Show it now.
I do not remember what the post was, and then you fixed it. But if you're sure you've never taken a photo of FOODY, I'm wrong