Writing workshop volume 16: How to accept criticism on your fiction writing

in #story7 years ago

Thanks for visiting! This is an ongoing series with advice and ideas for fiction writers--especially those who are just finding their way. You can find links to the other posts in this series at the end of the post.

How to accept criticism on your fiction writing

danger-939816_960_720.jpg
Image credit: Pixabay

How to accept criticism? "Graciously." There’s your answer, friend. We’re done here! Just kidding.

There’s a lot to explore about this topic. Accepting criticism is one of the hardest things we have to do, as writers. It’s necessary and important, but when it doesn’t go well, it’s like someone telling you that you have an ugly baby. No one wants to hear that.

In some ideal world, every piece of fiction you write is perfect and needs no editing. But you and I both know it never happens like that. So, if someone reads your story--a friend, family member or editor, for example--the last thing you are expecting to hear is “Don’t change a thing. It’s perfect. Send it off to The Atlantic!”

Of course you don’t expect that. You know you need to edit and revise, and you want some honest feedback so you can make sure your story is the best it can be. (Right?)

Let's talk about some common types of feedback and some things to think about.

Types of feedback

Some feedback may be easy to handle, and other types of feedback may not. Here are some examples of feedback you may receive if you work with editor, such as the hard working folks at The Writers' Block:

  1. Grammatical issues: These tips often include things like missing quotes, missing or misplaced periods or commas, “comma splice” comments (or “run-on sentence” comments) and so on. Most of these will be easy corrections.
  2. Fiction fundamentals: You may get comments about some well-known methods and best practices of fiction writing that can help you to improve your entire approach. For example, there are ways to make it clear to your reader who’s talking without writing “he said” and “she said” ad nauseam. If you embrace these fundamentals, it can impact the quality of all of your stories.
  3. Point-of-view (POV) problems: If the reader has a hard time seeing through the eyes of the protagonist, or the point of view seems to change willy-nilly, you will hear about it. Once you see these kinds of comments a few times, you will be more aware of it, and can think about ways to smooth out the POV.
  4. Storyline: The comments you are probably most keenly interested in are the ones about your plot, characters and the central conflict of the story. These will give you an idea about whether the story you are telling resonates with the reader and compels the reader to keep reading. Is the story plausible? Are the characters and their interactions believable and interesting? Does the reader start reading and want to keep reading. Is the conflict genuinely interesting, and does it resolve in the end? Comments related to these aspects of your story can hit you right in the gut, if they are not overwhelmingly positive.

What to do with the feedback

If you feel the reader/editor is right that there’s something missing, flawed or askew in your storyline, don’t flush the story down the toilet in a fit of despair. Maybe give it a rest and come back after you have time to think about how to tackle the issues.

Remember that you don’t have to accept and use all of the feedback you receive. It’s your story. If the comments are about fundamental flaws, that’s one thing. You will need to fix them to have a viable story. If the comments are due to the fact that the editor doesn't see your vision, and is suggesting changes that would make the story completely different from the one you wanted to tell, then you want to study the suggestions, but implement them only if they feel right.

I’ll tell you a little story. I just completed a piece of fiction and got some initial feedback. Several editors looked at it, and all provided some positive comments and some information about what didn’t work for them, which is absolute gold to me. I have a thick skin, and I don’t have any issues with people suggesting changes, and letting me know what they didn't like, what confused them, etc. Comments are generally spot on and help me see the flaws in my story that need fixing.

In this case, one of the comments was something to the effect of “you need more conflict.” So I'm thinking about that. But the fact is, the story’s conflict is intended to be somewhat subtle. It’s about a person having an internal struggle with self-esteem and the midlife blues. It’s not high drama. No one is going to get into fist fights or shout at each other, or do a Thelma and Louise and drive a car off a cliff. A highly dramatic story wouldn't have been right.

I actually read a published story as I started writing this one that I chose to use as a model for my story, in tone, style, and the intensity of the conflict. The published story was recently recommended by a fellow writer, and it’s absolutely a joy to read. And it was recently published in the New Yorker. The story is called Texas, by David Gates. Nothing highly dramatic happens in that story, and yet the characters and events and storytelling are all so compelling that I couldn’t set it down.

I know my story needs work and I’m going to roll up my sleeves and take a sculpting knife to it. But I know what the story is, and what it isn’t. I want to make it more of what it is, not what it isn’t intended to be.

I hope that helps you gain perspective when you receive comments from readers, friends and editors! Remember that they are most likely very well-meaning, and their comments can be incredibly helpful as you refine your story in subsequent drafts. But an important take-away is that you really can't please everyone, and when suggested edits are a matter of opinion, you can simply choose whether to allow them to guide your story.

Thanks for reading!

The previous posts in this series are:

To your success!

jayna_gifsignature.gif

Sort:  

This was helpful @jayna. I needed to hear that defining line as to what part is probably best to listen to and what part is probably up to yourself to decide.

I have been struggling with the idea of putting myself forward to editing by complete strangers, especially as there is already such a fore-planning involved on my part.

All I could do to deal with initial criticism is to post more content to show that all good things will come sooner or later.

As for other points of mine that need refining... someone has offered editing but with a feel of interest. This is important to me. The editor enjoys the works and wishes to help polish it and make it better. This is helpful and not hurtful.

So I will go forth into this new level of being edited and see what happens!

I'm so thrilled to read about your process, @zakludick. And I'm glad this post was helpful to you. It can be so very hard to put ourselves out there, and let our little infant writing pieces make their way out into the world... saying their first words, taking their first steps. Getting another person's eyes on your work is incredibly valuable. The neat thing about "strangers", since you mentioned that, is that you are less invested in what they think. So, consider that. But the fact is, if you're involved in a writing community like The Writers' Block, you get to know people and understand where they're coming from in their comments, which also adds an intriguing layer. And you can resubmit a second draft after incorporating the most meaningful and helpful feedback from the first. It rocks, honestly. I see you're posting a fantasy series. I haven't read them yet, but will do so. Congrats on jumping right in and putting your work out there. Best wishes to you!

I hope you enjoy them! I have some regulars already which is wonderful. Right now I am just splashing out the top of the bucket. The World of Kedra is a bit deeper than all this.

I enjoyed Raiders of the Middle Sea. It is fast paced and full of action and I hope to bring out even more of the small series like it that will bring the World of Kedra into better focus. Then drop the big story. Which is supposed to go for that "epic" fantasy mode.

There is some time before this happens. It all has to wind up first.

Great strategy! Good luck. I think it's so very helpful to have a focus and a series of things you want to do that all hang together and build momentum. I just love that approach. Applause applause!

This gem of a post was discovered by the OCD Team!

Reply to this comment if you accept, and are willing to let us share your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article may be used in our compilation post!

You can follow @ocd – learn more about the project and see other Gems! We strive for transparency.

I accept! Many thanks, @gmuxx!

This is great advice, especially the focus on weighing up the comment as regards your own overall vision. From my own experience, suggestions are meant well, and editors do wish to steer the author in the right direction (and I can only speak from my own experience), but it can be easy to lose sight of what out story means in its overall context. Thank you for highlighting that.

Thank you, @naquoya! I'm so glad you found value in this. It makes the late night effort to write it all worthwhile! I'm going to write a retrospective at the end of the month about the #challenge30days effort, and how that goal pushed me to write things I never would have if I hadn't been completely committed to writing something of value every day, before allowing myself to put my head down for at least a partial night's sleep.

Criticism is hard to take sometimes, but it is so very enlightening! And as you suggested, at the end of the day, you need to evaluate and incorporate the feedback but find a way to remain true to the spirit of the story you are writing.

Really nice and informative post :) if there is one thing i would point out, it is that i thought, from the title, that this is more about the psychology behind accepting criticism rather than the aspects of understanding it.

Thanks for reading and commenting, @multi4g! I nominate you to write the post dedicated to the psychology behind accepting feedback on your fiction. 😊

It is a multi-faceted thing, this. While I talked a bit about how it can feel like a punch to the old solar plexus to receive less-than-positive comments, my main goal in this post was to help new writers overcome that initial shock and navigate their way through the feedback to their best advantage. Thanks so much, again, for your comment!

Challenge accepted :) Although i will write about art in general, because i am not a fiction writer per se.

Well I was more or less kidding, my friend. But if you write it, I look forward to reading it.

I will make it part of my "struggles" series. It's actually a good topic. criticism and rejection are big elements. And there is always the "i'm just too far ahead with my art" delusion lurking at every corner. :)

Awesome. And I will check out your series.

I commented on the post too, but just want to say (for anyone who is wondering “should I click that link”?) that it’s a great post. You did a nice job of addressing the emotional roller coaster aspect of dealing with feedback, criticism and even rejection. Thanks for writing that and sharing it here, @multi4g!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.12
JST 0.027
BTC 62033.06
ETH 3004.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48