How low can a satellite go to stay in orbit?

in #stemng6 years ago

I was listening to a hip-hop song, oh yeah I like hip hop, How Low, while I was thinking of satellites.
How low can a satellite go to stay in orbit?

A satellite is usually the word for that man-made equipment or machine that orbits the planet. But those are the artificial satellites. The moon, earth, etc. are natural satellites. The earth is the natural satellite of the sun; it orbits the sun. The other things in the solar system orbit the sun such the asteroids. comets, planets, etc.

The earth's moon is the natural satellite of the Earth; it orbits the earth.


We need the artificial satellites in space for a lot of reasons. One of which is for communication such as phone calls, TVs and global positioning system (GPS), etc.

Currently, the GPS satellites alone has 31 satellites in orbit; this figure includes the decommissioned and those in reserve. For an excellent GPS sync, a total of 4 active satellites should be in available, and for the earth coverage a total of 24 active satellites.

If we look up above the sky appears all free and calm.

But according to the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, UNOOSA website, a total of 8086 satellites was launched into outer space since 1957. With a total of 4788 currently orbiting in space. This amount is an increase of 3.3% from last year's number.

James Yorder was kind enough to make a 3D visualisation in real time of the various satellites, rocket bodies and debris currently floating around in the space. It is a delightful interactive website which you may like to check out here. There are a bunch of information of each satellite too if you click on it such as altitude, velocity inclination, type, date of launch, etc.

So when next you look up the sky take a moment and take in the fact that there are thousands of human-made machines floating around in orbit.



What is an orbit and how does it occur?

The celestial body such as the plant has an area where the gravitational force can pull anything that is in proximity towards it.

But if an object can "escape" this region of gravitational force, it will not experience a continuous free fall.

Orbit is the outcome of a perfect balance between a planet's gravitational tug and the forward momentum of the body in space. The gravitational force is usually from the more prominent body in space such as a star or a planet.

The body manages to stay in orbit and move in circles as the tug-of-war between the forward momentum of the object and the gravity continues as seen in this image here.

The two forces (inertia and gravity) has to be perfectly balanced for this orbit to be in place. If the forward momentum is too strong, the object will speed past the orbit, if too weak, the gravity will pull the object to the body exuding the gravitational pull.

The gravitatational pull of earth can still be felt more than 238,855 miles (384,000 km) from earth. This distance is the closest approach (perigee) the moon's elliptical orbit from earth happens to be.

The orbit around the earth is in various categories which are dependent on the distance of the satellite from it. There are four broad categories of classification by altitude. These are the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) such as the orbit of the international space station (ISS). The LEO is also for monitoring the earth's surface and in military use for spying. The medium earth orbit (MEO) finds application in GPS used in sat. navs.

The Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO) such as the earth observatory, used mainly for communication purposes, e.g. satellite tv

The last is the High earth orbit (HEO) satellites. An example is the Intersetllar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) used by the NASA for scientific observation. It is the most suitable since its high orbit allows it to move out of the earth's magnetosphere

NameColorDistance above earth(km)
EarthBlue/brown0
Low Earth Orbit(LEO)Cyan area160 to 2,000
Medium Earth Orbit(MEO)Yellow area2,000 to 34,780
International Space Station(ISS)Red dotted line370
Global Positioning SystemGreen dash-dot line20,230
Geostationary OrbitBlack dashed line35794
High Earth OrbitNot shown in drawingabove 35,794km

So to answer the question, how low can you go to stay in orbit is 160km which is in the low earth orbit (LEO) region. If an object gets below 160km, it will experience an orbital decay, that is it will lose altitude due to the pull of gravity.

The LEO is an essential aspect of the space program since it is where the ISS is located. Also, all astronauts have to conduct their affairs at LEO except for the crew of the Apollo program between 1968 to 1972.

Now that I know this, all I require is a spaceship capable of catapulting me to a distance of 160km to hit that orbit and start orbiting the earth at a period of between 84 to 127 minutes.


References


If you write STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) related posts, consider joining #steemSTEM on discord here. If you are from Nigeria, you may want to include the #stemng tag in your post. You can visit this blog by @stemng for more details. You can also check this blog post by @steemstem here and this guidelines here for help on how to be a member of @steemstem. Please also check this blog post from @steemstem on proper use of images devoid of copyright issues here

Sort:  

I did a post on a new type of satellite being developed by the European Space Agency: ESA's Air Breathing Satellite.

It is basically an ion engine that uses the tenuous air in the extreme upper atmosphere to counteract the drag forces.

It's a neat idea.

I replied this message before, but it appears my slow network did not allow it to reflect. I read your article, and I think it is quite innovative. I think it may even be cheaper than the current technology when it is implemented. Let's hope it does just that.

The number of objects in space is a real problem, as this may challenge future launches at some point. Hopefully, things will be solved sooner or later...

Cleaning up the space will be a big project judging by the number of foreign objects we've transported so far to that place.

I've got dibs on Tesla.

I have seen plenty of projects, but I honestly don't know which ones will be actually achieved. The future will tell us :)

I guess they don't realized the long effect then? Earth is already in big trouble for being so polluted, now even in the space they throw there garbages, oh men!

Well, this is the case since the early days of humans going to space. But now, we know about that and people design projects to clean up space. We may hopefully end up with a solution soon or later :)

Hope so or else we will have a debris rain also hahaha :) just wanted to laugh to make it light, since life is already complicated hehehe. Thank u so much for the reply, steem on!

There are many projects for clearing up space debris. For now it's one launch for each debris, but I am thinking that more versatile spacecraft could take on more than one mission. An optimized mission plan with the least DeltaV budget could be calculated by computers, making one launch for 3-4..n debris.

@alexdory, how effective are the various projects tasked with the clearance of space debris being?

None for now as far as I know :D
But they are in tests and advanced planning. The effectiveness should be 100%, the objects are being tracked and their position is well known so it shouldn't be that hard. I would say it's the same chance of a vehicle successfully docking with the ISS.

Ok, let's see how they'd pull that off. Thank you.,

I have read many proposals, but I am actually wondering which one will be realized at the end of the day. As the problem is real and may be (somehow) a threat at some point (at least for the lifetime of the useful satellites), I hope to see the solution implemented during my lifetime.

Yes, me too and I honestly can't give you an estimate because I don't think there is real interest in those projects right now. Let's hope that at least a proof of concept launch will be done in 2023. E.deorbit made by ESA is one of the real options.

"Holger Krag of the European Space Agency states that as of 2017 there is no binding international regulatory framework with no progress occurring at the respective UN body in Vienna."

Nothing beats a workable solution even if it's on a microscopic scale.

I agree. We probably need either time until the situation becomes really tough, or a great person :)

Because I am afraid a collision seems imminent between satellites in the future if nothing is done about it.

I think we still have time for that. But not too sure. You seem to know more than me with respect to space stuff :D

Just an enthusiast :)

An enthusiast who has time :)

Technically, If an object gets below 160km, it will experience an exponentially increased orbital decay. But the decay is there at even higher altitudes because of the stray atmospherical particles.
"The ISS maintains an orbit with an altitude of between 330 and 435 km (205 and 270 mi) by means of reboost manoeuvres using the engines of the Zvezda module or visiting spacecraft."

Practically every once in a while the ISS fires its engines retrograde(this means the rocket is propelled prograde - in the direction of movement). A lot of fuel is used this way, actually.

So any other spacecraft in LEO should do the same.

Now that can explain the huge budget of NASA.

I wouldn't want to be the bad guy here but I do have suspicions of bad management of the funds NASA gets. Many private companies are paid using those funds and I have witnessed some awful comments made by former astronauts - now congressmen that would be viewed as manipulative. That's the deal with public funds and politics 101 :(
I could ellaborate but I would talk with no proof.

I do see your sentiment echoed in many quarters. People feel that they can achieve better with a leaner budget. But since it is the government, the only way to make them see reason is to go the SpaceX way. Make space projects cheaper and remove some of the "mysteries" which surrounds space exploration.

Yes, sadly here is the problem.
The big friends of NASA are the United Launch Alliance (ULA) - a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Space Systems and Boeing Defense, Space & Security. They had a monopoly until a few years ago when SpaceX came to snatch some of the military contracts. They had no real plans of going cheaper until now, it's why monopolies are bad.
This is why aliens don't visit :D

They'd be forced to go cheaper with SpaceX reusable concept at play.

Insightful work @greenrun.
I had always thought about how polluted the earth is but recently, I've been concern on how to clean the pollution of the earth.
It would take a fortune to redeem the earth from it's current state.
I have also asked myself if this cleaning would ever happen?

We can only hope it does.

That was an indepth and exhaustive overview......learnt a lot from this.
Amazing that we have over four thousand satelite orbiting the space....really interesting.
Thanks for this wonderful article....it was worth reading

Thank you for stopping by the blog. You guys make science great again.

total of 8086 satellites

Jeez. We've been busy.

We love our satellites :)

I’m not so big on physics and stuff but I actually found this content interesting and informative too and it got me wondering how possible it could be for us to be in constant watch by any one or company who owns any of those satellites. Tad bit creepy I’ll say

The Big Brother is always watching, the least we could do is be entertaining :)

LOL payporte should make you an ambassador. I see what you did there 😁

Thats quite lower than what i was expecting. But i guess acceleration would determine if you will land at LEO or not right?

The orbit is determined by the rocket that is propelling the satellite to space. Distance is calculated before launch.

So does the distance determines the speed at which the rocket will travel or the speed is constant irrespective of distance?

Good question @gentleshaid

@kingabesh, I just answered it. Thank you.

@gentleshaid, Once the rocket beats the escape velocity, it is now in space; the remaining guidance system positions the satellite in a location where it is needed. The orbital period speed at which a rocket travels is dependent on the altitude location. The velocity is more at Lower Orbit than on the high orbit as depicted by this diagram.

Wikipedia CC:: Comparison of several satellite navigation system orbits

The speed of rocket launch is dependent on the desired final destination. If it is for orbit around the earth, you'd require a rocket speed of at least 4.9 miles per second (7.9km per second) or 17,600 miles per hour (28324 km/hr).

But if you are heading to the moon, you may need speeds of at least 7 miles per second (11.3 km/s) or 25,000 miles per hour (40233km/hr).

That explains it. Thanks

@greenrun if you find such satallite that will catapult you will be willing to try? This is an interesting topic. Reading words like orbit, inertia and gravitational force brings back memories of a physics classroom. Thanks for sharing.

Interesting times I guess :)

Hehehe sir how will u then come down? Haha, peace! I just wonder with those thousands of satellites in outer space, and use for GPS location or to know the location then why is that other government agencies couldn't find the exact location or where those people who abduct people is hiding? Then I guess i conclude, maybe because we are humans and not perfect, or there's a game that was being played that's why those people can't be located. But sir @greenrun you did make me go to outside earth by just reading this and the very simple yet understandable description you made my mind flew and orbiting the earth, and I will not worry to go down for it's just my mind flew away hahaha, peace :)

Sometimes they do find things, for instance, if you are building a nuclear weapon in your backyard, I am sure you will be getting a visit from a government agency :)

I short, they do find things they are interested in finding. Message taken

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.11
JST 0.031
BTC 67659.31
ETH 3802.76
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.75