You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A question of/for the community on advertising rival platforms

in #steemit6 years ago

But I assume you are not considering me as big fishes here anyway lol

This was all directed solely at you :P

The message "Take Care of Others" is a strong one that touched me a lot! Some may laugh but isn't it great to pay attention and care about others instead of only trying to maximise profits?

Meh, this is what I heard the first 6 months at Steemit until the bidbots started their New World Order.

Hence we also have major problems here with broken promises and strange things happening in terms of money making.

I am hoping some of this 'strange' stops once the others start but, they are set up on auto-pilot so it is unlikely.

I will continue promoting the concept of ONO moving forward as I like the "caring" approach a lot

The lack of care disguised as care here is something that should be addressed. The problem is, the people who the community have so often chosen as their 'caretakers' are the ones wearing the disguises.

Thanks for stopping by too, it means a lot. As said, I have lots of questions about many, many things here but, not often do any answers come. People just blame the code and say the system allows it...

Stop by again sometime... but geez... 5 lines would be plenty.. ;)

Sort:  

Thanks for replying buddy - agree i heard a similar message when I started on Steemit re equality and even years before on a different platform that cheated its users in the end, was before blockchain.

Therefore I appreciate all concerns by everybody - I also do my due diligence before jumping on anything, sometimes it simply requires more gut feel though - can be good, can be wrong.

As of the Steemit things - the lacking care is an issue- or better, the lack of communications what these guys actually do is a major problem, maybe they care but they do not tell it and show it to the community! I know a lot blames - the code - yeah linear or back to the system before HF17 - both have their pros and cons - the discussion of witnesses driving only their own profits with their projects. A lot a lot - probably a topic for 2 weeks of Steemfest or SteemGetTogetherToSolveTheShitFest - not doable via a comment (which is too long again lol)

Probably a lot here also remember the early Steemit message and link ONO to @dan as ONO will run on EOS. I like the ONO message because of what I have heard and seen from the ONO CEO - hope I am right!

I guess we will see how it all plays out but at the end of the day, it will be the little fish who will pay the highest costs if it all goes south.

The highest costs if all goes south might be the ones that always power up on Steemit and gorget to take out some money - the ones that do not invest have nothing to lose.

On ONO I think there is a different scenario - not big stakeholders will be the important ones but people that prove to take care as they will be elected by the community or if they do not care kicked out.

The highest costs if all goes south might be the ones that always power up on Steemit and gorget to take out some money - the ones that do not invest have nothing to lose.

Me.

not big stakeholders will be the important ones but people that prove to take care as they will be elected by the community or if they do not care kicked out.

Sounds a little like a Black Mirror episode. social scoring. It is Chinese right? They might integrate it into the other social initiatives they are supposedly rolling out. Perhaps it is worth the investment considering that.

I am just teasing but, this is where a lot of this type of tech will likely lead.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 62214.82
ETH 2429.20
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.68