How many users were active last week?

in #steemit8 years ago

We currently have 61,392 accounts on Steemit, but how many of them are active?

I have decided to look into the past 7 days of activity on the blockchain:

Start: 2016-08-07T00:00:00, Block #3859146
End:   2016-08-14T00:00:00, Block #4059780

Results

It turns out 13,083 users were active in the past week.
Every account that has written at least 1 blog post, or comment, or casted a vote is deemed active.

Has PostedHas CommentedHas Voted
Accounts5,8525,91712,761

My Interpretation
It looks like we had about ~6k active authors and ~12.7k active readers last week.

To me, this is good news, as I have guesstimated the size of the author community to be between 2-3k - and we have double that.

I think active authors is a better metric than registered users, because they create value on a recurring basis, bring their own audiences over, and attract other authors. Furthermore, the more quality content we have, the better the search traffic. It all feeds back into more users and growth.

If you thought most of the 60k accounts are 'real', then this may come as a slight disappointment to you.
It is worth noting, that a chunk of the accounts are/were miners.
Furthermore, it seems like we are under the attack of cybersquatting. People are registering valuable names such as @samsung, @gap and @gym with hopes to be able to sell those names in the future.

Most Active Users

Here is the list of 50 most active writers in the last week.
You will see that the ones on the top of the list are mostly spammers.

AuthorPosts
1taz142
2dog134
3lenar102
4yassinebentour87
5mxu11169
6stoneybrooks69
7trisnawati66
8stillsafe64
9wildchild61
10kasper58
11nkdk58
12erotic55
13runridefly55
14crowe52
15cryptocurrency152
16jackgallenhall47
17lkong8747
18alexoz44
19cileremit44
20jeffreyahann44
21mrkuujo43
22allmonitors40
23matrixdweller38
24nigroll38
25rkpl38
26contentjunkie37
27villainblack37
28xntryk137
29kevbonneau35
30dicov34
31heretickitten34
32illidans34
33wakeupnd34
34karenmckersie33
35tamara198933
36alwaysfelicia32
37herzmeister32
38jamesart6332
39satire32
40aartijohn2031
41craig-grant31
42alexandre30
43laconicflow30
44dimon1429
45jpiper2029
46margot29
47nameles29
48skapaneas29
49arcaneinfo28
50colinsydes28

And the top 50 commenters:

AuthorComments
1amihay1786
2cheetah1011
3alona927
4thecryptofiend733
5kaylinart574
6isaac.asimov518
7nameles502
8foxkoit371
9dwinblood364
10knozaki2015353
11acidyo309
12stellabelle303
13bendjmiller222298
14lukestokes293
15johnnyyash287
16robok283
17cryptos268
18veralynn266
19elyaque263
20freddy008263
21confucius252
22cryptobarry251
23jarvis247
24ciao245
25lillianjones243
26mammasitta242
27razvanelulmarin242
28sharon239
29allasyummyfood237
30condra235
31steemster1234
32michaellamden68231
33mrgrey229
34ace108228
35anonymint226
36klye223
37msjennifer223
38anca3drandom221
39bullionstackers220
40opheliafu216
41kbargold215
42clevecross213
43fabio205
44alexgr200
45sisterholics197
46felixxx195
47williambanks195
48ervin-lemark193
49voltarius189
50meesterboom188

I am a bit annoyed with spammers skewing the leaderboards, but hopefully they will go away once they realize spam isn't profitable around here.


Does editing a post 'bump' it?
I've noticed some people edit their posts a lot. A person I shall not name does edit their post 30-40 times after posting.
Does anyone know if editing a post has any effect on its position in steemit.com feed?


Sort:  

not sure if editing a post 'bumps' you. but given the 4 posts per day rule that come in recently even if he did get exposure the penalty for that many updates would wipe out his potential gain anyway

Yes they will get penalised in the payouts so it doesn't really matter. I think originally this was a bug but it actually prevents people gaming the system this way.

This is a better way to drive activity. Stee activity lotto. We can make it work and still prevent spam using existing tools. https://steemit.com/steem-ideas/@dennygalindo/steem-idea-ways-to-increase-active-users-activity-lotto

Oh lol, 9th in comments considering @isaac.asimov and @cheetah are bots. :D
I should take some vacation.

So I'm not on any list? Shame on me. I like your post and It was good information, at least for me.

Here is the list of 50 most active writers in the last week.
You will see that the ones on the top of the list are mostly spammers.

In theory, given the dis-incentives for posting more than 4 times per day, we'd expect a max of around 28 posts per week (4x7=28), yet this is where the top50 starts...

I think we can look in retrospect and learn what happened as other social media platforms grew...cybersquatting...never really thought of it - yet, it's so obvious...it's like a new iteration of domain name marketing...anyway, there's a place for everybody..I guess...and as you said, with time and with the development of the platform we should be better able to get things under better control.

My problem with Steemit is that there aren't enough quality posts. Medium is my preferred place to go for quality posts to read and contribute, the community is more quality, the people are more quality. People who write there genuinely write quality stuff that come to my inbox and make me want to read it and log on. I come here and it's hard to want to be involved. It's mostly just people talking about themselves; and not about others, what they can do for others or what they are doing for others. Not enough tips or advice or guides or people interested in them; no how to program X, Y, Z, etc.

Steemit is cool concept, and it's creating a way to do social media different, but, I wish steemit had more quality and less junk and an easier way to sif through it, as well as to modify your personal identity and so on. Sure I could write some posts here and maybe I will but being a reader who enjoys reading quality stuff online, hard to find that on steemit. Maybe it is the type of audience steemit attracts, I'll have to think more on that. In any case it's personally why I am not active on steemit, at this point and time it's simply not rewarding or fun to be here beyond 'financial' reward.

I agree about an easier way to sift through it. As writers go, it is very heartbreaking to watch your quality pieces list at $0.08 only to fade into oblivion to never be seen again while a playful kitten goes for $825.00. Without a healthy group of established followers there is no exposure and great work can virtually never be seen. Coming over to steem I brought a few followers along, hence a few gets me 8 cents. I understand patience, and in time, blah blah blah and as a writer, I get that. My friend is still getting $0.00 each day. How does it not feel like a slap in the face. How many good writers will leave? I do not believe that more than 20 people have ever seen my work. Thinking about chasing my cat around with my camera, maybe junk pays.

actually there is plenty of quality real life issue posts. I write some. Infact im trying to raise awareness about fucking up other peoples towns and cities when people go to festivals. Basically unless you put your penis in the butt of steemit you will not get the upvotes.... Sad but true.

My observations: Editing a post bumps you in the (active) ranking. The 4 posts/day penalty does not apply to this.

thanks for the stats! @furion 8]

Thank you for your efforts in doing this research.I would like to point out one thing when it comes to inactive accounts: Some people register (like my girlfriend and my room mate),and then forget about it,because it´s new to them,they have others things to do,and it seems a bit abstract.A lot of people have the intuition that the money in Steem is not "real" because they are not used to cryptocurrencies.I think my girlfriend will reconsider when her steemit account balance is bigger ,in a month or so..

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.029
BTC 60951.51
ETH 3381.22
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48