RE: Steemit Pedophile Ring Exposed
Did you ignore the rest of my post?
Or are you just being technical?
You're wrong of course otherwise being subscribed to a youtube channel or following someone on Twitter would also implicate you in the same way. There's no way they would take that argument seriously. I see you didn't think that Steemit holds an even greater potential legal responsibility and not to mention all the bots set up to send upvotes for SBD you could claim are funding them. They aren't implicated but potentially numerous bot driven upvotes and followers have been and which you've argued could be technically justified when such "direct" funding and hosting is objectively far more serious. You can't defend the idea that they can be said to be a "ring" without implicating Steemit and the whale vote bots even more.
And if you want to get technical, as I said, the image was not actually child porn. It wasn't even porn, and it's absolutely NOT clear the girl is under 18 anyway. What was nsfw about it? The headline.
Umm? I think PC Plod would disagree with your "You're wrong of course" any self-respecting rozzer will use communications with criminals as evidence of complicity. Ignorance is no defence in the UK and many European countries too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat so saying "We'll yeah, detective. I follow them but I'm not involved in any of that stuff." possibly won't be believed.
I've read what I suspect is your second paragraph starting "I see you didn't think that Steemit holds an even greater potential legal ".... three times now and I still have no idea what you're talking about.
TBH. I don't care. I've not looked at the accounts, I have no intention of looking at the accounts. I'm not sure why, but you seem to be coming across as aggressive IMO so I'll leave you to it.