I've been posting on Steemit for longer than you've been on Steemit. There is a history behind the posting limits.
Prior to the posting limits being removed the economics encouraged bloggers to post between 4 and 6 blog posts per day. Then after I believe it was 6 posts, the rewards would decrease for every additional post until it was a punishment to keep posting.
This stayed the rule for a while but for some unknown reason the developers of Steem changed the economics around to favor frequent posting. The changes made commenting less rewarding than blog posting. The discussions about the same topics you complain about which you claim I'm flying under the radar about were discussed by me and others a year ago.
So what you need to do if you really feel the new economics are worse is you should ask the Steemit developers to switch back to rate limit blog posting to 4 posts a day. It's not really fair to me if I'm being accused of abuse for following the rules. And the economics encourage frequent small posts, so even if I didn't post at all we would get a lot of these sorts of posts in general because that is the trend in general.
If they switch back to limiting the posts to 4 a day then I'd be made to post only 4 posts a day and so would everyone else. This could be seen as fair for you? Flagging my posts does not change the economics of Steemit nor does it increase the reward pool. In fact it's a sort of scarcity mindset which doesn't add any value to Steem.
Whether you read my posts or not, the content is valued by others. If Steemit changes the rewards or economics the content still remains adding value to Steemit for years. So a post you might think is not worth even $25 could be worth hundreds, and a post you think is worth hundreds could only get a payout of $25.
Would I benefit if each of my posts got exactly what they were worth? Perhaps, but then people would complain (as they did before) that some of my posts are making too much money. If you look back to some of my posts from 2016 before there were bots, some of my posts made hundreds or thousands, but those posts were elaborate and deep.
When the economics changed to support shorter less deep posts, (because the payouts became flatter), this was said to be because the flatter reward curve is fairer, so I posted within those rules. If the payout is flatter but you remove the cap which rate limits how often a blogger can post then of course they will post more frequently. This is only a problem in my opinion if the quality of the posts go down.
And I'm not receiving much indication that the quality of my posts is so bad. Perhaps some of my posts I admit were a bit short, and you can always look up anyone's posting record to find some post where maybe they got rewarded more than you think they should have, but the overall quality of my posts is much higher than most.
Again for you and any other reader, if you read my posts and think the quality is not up to par for some reason then offer suggestions or show me the model blogger who you think is doing the best job. But don't claim abuse for posting frequently when the economics encourage it and the rules allow it.
Compared to some articles I saw pennies.
You have been flying under the radar quite well I see. This is destroying Steemit rewards pool. I have flagged many of your posts.
I've been posting on Steemit for longer than you've been on Steemit. There is a history behind the posting limits.
Prior to the posting limits being removed the economics encouraged bloggers to post between 4 and 6 blog posts per day. Then after I believe it was 6 posts, the rewards would decrease for every additional post until it was a punishment to keep posting.
This stayed the rule for a while but for some unknown reason the developers of Steem changed the economics around to favor frequent posting. The changes made commenting less rewarding than blog posting. The discussions about the same topics you complain about which you claim I'm flying under the radar about were discussed by me and others a year ago.
So what you need to do if you really feel the new economics are worse is you should ask the Steemit developers to switch back to rate limit blog posting to 4 posts a day. It's not really fair to me if I'm being accused of abuse for following the rules. And the economics encourage frequent small posts, so even if I didn't post at all we would get a lot of these sorts of posts in general because that is the trend in general.
If they switch back to limiting the posts to 4 a day then I'd be made to post only 4 posts a day and so would everyone else. This could be seen as fair for you? Flagging my posts does not change the economics of Steemit nor does it increase the reward pool. In fact it's a sort of scarcity mindset which doesn't add any value to Steem.
Whether you read my posts or not, the content is valued by others. If Steemit changes the rewards or economics the content still remains adding value to Steemit for years. So a post you might think is not worth even $25 could be worth hundreds, and a post you think is worth hundreds could only get a payout of $25.
Would I benefit if each of my posts got exactly what they were worth? Perhaps, but then people would complain (as they did before) that some of my posts are making too much money. If you look back to some of my posts from 2016 before there were bots, some of my posts made hundreds or thousands, but those posts were elaborate and deep.
When the economics changed to support shorter less deep posts, (because the payouts became flatter), this was said to be because the flatter reward curve is fairer, so I posted within those rules. If the payout is flatter but you remove the cap which rate limits how often a blogger can post then of course they will post more frequently. This is only a problem in my opinion if the quality of the posts go down.
And I'm not receiving much indication that the quality of my posts is so bad. Perhaps some of my posts I admit were a bit short, and you can always look up anyone's posting record to find some post where maybe they got rewarded more than you think they should have, but the overall quality of my posts is much higher than most.
Again for you and any other reader, if you read my posts and think the quality is not up to par for some reason then offer suggestions or show me the model blogger who you think is doing the best job. But don't claim abuse for posting frequently when the economics encourage it and the rules allow it.
"Would I benefit if each of my posts got exactly what they were worth? Perhaps..."
If your posts got exactly what they are worth, you will receive pennies for most of the posts.