TOP 200 effective Steemit curators for the last week (2018.03.19-2018.03.25)

in #steemit6 years ago

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

top200.jpg


What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.


How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.


47308 authors published their posts during this week.

87317 accounts participated in the content curating according to information from the database.

4002547 votes were made during this week.

605685,8 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.


TOP-200 effective curators for for the last week (2018.03.19-2018.03.25)

AccountVotesAuthorsVAS(%)Contr. (SBD)Share %Eff.
1@hendrikdegrote25021243310142,371,67266,49
2@dlive1311612518163,053234,97
3@pharesim8010459902240,680,37217,83
4@hr19262541701601,50,26183,38
5@esteemapp6712313302741,850,45181,58
6@utopian-io4252561020632,723,41111,65
7@good-karma6712313501621,720,27107,47
8@dtube6722931017078,362,82105,77
9@surpassinggoogle161488333622,730,667,62
10@therising96860274401,260,7356,01
11@passive4851186997715,310,1228,26
12@virus707262395621350,360,2227,29
13@ausbitbank124467961851,390,3126,57
14@mercurybot175382241506,90,2526,18
15@dsound510149128301,941,3726,15
16@liberosist2140113631009,110,1724,23
17@curie250512423919,320,1524,14
18@peaceandlove254183495461,040,921,12
19@kevinwong140261771503,650,2519,61
20@slowwalker480308132939,440,4919,14
21@acidyo318242243725,350,6219,06
22@sndbox425160214668,50,7715,79
23@wackou92341871672,210,2814,78
24@xeldal197112385869,210,9713,9
25@anwenbaumeister250212413507,450,0813,31
26@anomadsoul370275182231,410,3712,97
27@meerkat214011363537,790,0912,91
28@qurator24365983902,370,1511,41
29@skan114830161687,660,2810,74
30@roelandp22645802850,580,1410,43
31@newhope411250181876,880,319,92
32@donkeypong474129143536,480,589,64
33@alexis5554102461816400,278,53
34@canadian-coconut277113263461,110,578,27
35@estabond8184717755,430,127,52
36@teamsteem95321471660,450,277,51
37@allaz9014957692,910,117,25
38@arama214176561935,020,327,2
39@upmewhale52936712867,950,146,73
40@cervantes366269181153,870,196,56
41@shaka54538114810,880,136,53
42@redes407244181178,690,196,08
43@ripperone409242181126,920,195,76
44@abdullar589207101297,060,215,68
45@xaero114483513197,230,535,61
46@v4vapid15080493139,910,525,31
47@bramd396152281627,360,275,23
48@adsactly22840305912,520,985
49@reggaemuffin18395392266,360,374,55
50@mangos42226517808,450,134,53
51@artzone246710973194,620,034,51
52@marketstack52342882173,620,014,48
53@sniffnscurry300141141428,050,244,26
54@cheetah70973180062,110,014,17
55@sweetsssj8646444289,630,714,17
56@davidding140125411564,450,264,13
57@arunava15228574213,340,043,86
58@arcange203510895160,750,033,7
59@kpine21125426833,521,133,61
60@ioc148119451349,830,223,4
61@nanzo-scoop609111221444,850,243,39
62@analisa475130141233,930,23,39
63@cryptoctopus48179112019,490,333,37
64@candyboy28996191640,380,273,33
65@dmania8158402677,790,443,28
66@seakraken7823968376,470,063,15
67@redpalestino35021646658,340,113,01
68@dang007728104101304,50,222,87
69@fuzzyvest12460432213,830,372,81
70@jamesc7337863575,280,592,8
71@candyman45120323644,250,112,76
72@kusadasi13683531575,680,262,76
73@steem-id15918873146,120,022,74
74@soyo63827412465,950,082,7
75@edensgarden53730811405,560,072,64
76@gavvet17837393279,40,542,56
77@trafalgar14836253334,380,552,54
78@minnowvotes63534110339,980,062,45
79@enki124103651099,780,182,39
80@imacryptorick16913479830,760,142,35
81@staticinstance7693915282,810,052,34
82@heiditravels36826919409,660,072,33
83@z8teyb289qav9z13161541810,330,32,33
84@cryptopassion13048552266,450,372,3
85@pgarcgo36426818391,070,062,22
86@adamkokesh7525924126,040,682,18
87@spydo44723913429,370,072,17
88@steemnaira29121289483,30,082,17
89@kaylinart44632052317,330,052,15
90@cryptomancer21816740609,990,12,15
91@hwawol154100581007,360,172,13
92@planter25214830678,280,112,12
93@ace10891017816560,950,092,11
94@steemstem29720219494,90,082,11
95@abigail-dantes38822821432,970,072,09
96@kushed30801346471,550,012,04
97@matt-a1189857979,720,162,03
98@enlil14411355840,090,142,01
99@yoo19008040572365,180,392
100@wuhotan14569084104,430,022
101@bhuz7757641626,950,271,96
102@golbang10785546162,740,031,91
103@blockops24920148446,760,071,9
104@mustard31816921525,10,091,88
105@steemprentice52833026129,1701,87
106@kommienezuspadt15110659804,790,131,8
107@centering38717918464,640,081,76
108@tincho42133819246,610,041,76
109@warofcraft80961524132,490,021,72
110@fminerten9837992161,610,361,69
111@vortac2958328961,50,161,69
112@onealfa1632946382,430,011,65
113@silvergoldbotty3648119955,560,161,64
114@gargon36627018284,940,051,63
115@inceptionally22817645429,70,071,6
116@dailyupvotes45727614269,080,041,57
117@purepinay12315104145,60,021,57
118@hanshotfirst3459417784,730,131,56
119@kingscrown24670341054,430,171,56
120@justtryme9032021212340,830,061,53
121@robocity1722735497,790,021,52
122@trevonjb35742181706,630,281,52
123@levycore54624812290,230,051,52
124@senseicat43834111209,160,031,51
125@czechglobalhosts13041441736,070,291,5
126@grandpawhale5722613271,330,041,5
127@accelerator49838713182,540,031,49
128@oldtimer2469730707,490,121,45
129@ramta9758391129,470,191,38
130@upboater44727714232,420,041,36
131@kimthewriter35115219418,370,071,34
132@bigdeej19351025260,370,011,31
133@damarth3196916880,950,151,28
134@gringalicious23511329531,480,091,27
135@zahnspange58411512520,950,091,27
136@aghunter7134499132,670,021,26
137@stephen.king98946753022119,7301,26
138@brupvoter34821118280,870,051,25
139@dexter-k21801078453,50,011,22
140@steemed-proxy71131004438,320,731,22
141@korea42714415396,540,071,21
142@cjsdns34625012228,040,041,21
143@kwiba15921503692580,530,011,18
144@onceuponatime9139831408,70,231,16
145@leemikyung28310624510,120,081,14
146@d-pend2289428570,610,091,13
147@inciter44725814205,180,031,12
148@knozaki201560412811409,940,071,11
149@boatymcboatface3829838528,980,091,1
150@emrebeyler68931610163,930,031,09
151@hansikhouse45623020221,610,041,08
152@penguinpablo32611121454,950,081,07
153@mrs.agsexplorer11533898130,350,021,07
154@steempty9837991305,990,221,02
155@joceo001988638561,190,091,02
156@leomichael30512824375,330,061,02
157@glitterfart8811734381,640,721,02
158@nado.bot45924412195,070,031,01
159@jesseluther43130998154,870,031,01
160@thecyclist5291298361,850,060,99
161@dobartim4037815599,630,10,99
162@choogirl8952995155,240,030,98
163@fabien1045499831,750,140,95
164@picokernel21917156260,150,040,94
165@leesol16512831341,310,060,92
166@fur2002ks33314921292,710,050,92
167@claudiop6331625195174,250,030,92
168@tipu33015529278,90,050,91
169@michelios1274713660,240,010,91
170@stephenkendal26115427277,70,050,9
171@swissclive938472506,830,080,9
172@pfunk895357797,460,130,89
173@kamikaze26912427339,750,060,89
174@cheongpyeongyull2699926418,770,070,88
175@eric-boucher6374841184,870,010,87
176@adriatik40122712174,940,030,84
177@woo773914610445372,170,060,82
178@noctisk30713816279,920,050,82
179@timsaid57433215117,480,020,82
180@rivalhw2476735572,430,090,81
181@benleemusic25451026237,520,010,81
182@bayanihan61626613142,530,020,8
183@ebargains21315032253,380,040,8
184@whalebuilder41527212137,540,020,79
185@ranchorelaxo784959370,111,550,79
186@voronoi31714929248,680,040,78
187@treeplanter42520915176,410,030,78
188@justyy52911915304,160,050,77
189@steemaccess19434611066,910,180,77
190@clayop634977741,420,120,77
191@khaiyoui2039033401,940,070,76
192@liondani15360100602,280,10,76
193@sunrawhale46726814130,670,020,74
194@billbutler21016261215,310,040,74
195@ghasemkiani23114730237,10,040,74
196@b0y2k59111214302,790,050,72
197@glitterbooster33318641182,030,030,72
198@ew-and-patterns1699931343,870,060,72
199@ocd14613040262,430,040,72
200@steembasicincome12313186106,240,020,71

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

AccountVotesAuthorsVAS(%)Contr. (SBD)Share %Eff.
1@postpromoter13416745226673,74322,94
2@smartsteem1305754516868,022,78268,84
3@upme1187687513219,462,18191,97
4@appreciator1135657612860,422,12178,6
5@buildawhale927498716268,642,69171,26
6@busy.org11057491501603,630,26166,61
7@rocky1956604711136,861,84142,19
8@booster217889426569,661,08124,15
9@minnowsupport878245860686,480,1166,55
10@jerrybanfield104767164306,060,7161,08
11@promobot82353683786,020,6342,9
12@minnowbooster322203308899,771,4738,19
13@boomerang654384104521,690,7536,7
14@upmyvote609399113663,420,630,9
15@sneaky-ninja96057951991,260,3324,37
16@pushup521325121173,60,198,06
17@busy.pay28178183288,270,545,42
18@randowhale49223713943,050,164,72
19@minnowhelper14715524356,660,064,16
20@speedvoter19336021146,410,021,86
21@msp-bidbot51727712225,550,041,32
22@drotto37911001161,550,011,3
23@bumper33017720298,30,051,12
24@lays1299752531,190,091,09
25@lovejuice45924814181,360,030,95
26@msp-lovebot16453078139,860,020,91

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemitt.


Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

Sort:  

Very interesting statistics. It's like a who's who of the most influential programs and accounts on Steem!

Actually, now that I think about it... have you considered a similar ranking of the top 200 witnesses so people could see where they stand in terms of actually supporting content creators?

Thank you!
It's a really good idea and it could be realized, but I don't think I can do it.
Need time to think about it

A lot of the users are whales or have a massive amount of SP. Is there a way to find users who earn the highest % of curation based on their amount of SP? Like someone with 100 SP is earning like 5 SP in curating a day. I know the example is exaggerating but just wondering if this is even possible. Thanks.

Interesting! Still learning about Steemit. This was another piece of the pizzor. Thankyou!

thanks for compiling the list. after reading some recent articles on bid bots, this is hopeful. thanks to everyone who's on this list! especially the hardworking group of @curie and everyone involved in that. i also see @acidyo up there and a few other individual accounts (of course he and @anomadsoul are @ocd) who are spreading the SP. thanks for giving me hope!

You are welcome :-)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 67024.68
ETH 3312.25
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74