DApps on STEEM - Analyzing SteemHunt
Steemhunt Discover Cool Products and Get Rewards by STEEM. Product hunt on STEEM
Repository
@steemhunt has been in receipt of funding from Steemit Inc by way of delegation from @Misterdelegation. As one of the newer apps on the block, this is the first analysis I have published on data around @steemhunt, and I think it is a project worth showcasing.
In addition to delegation from @misterdelegation, steemhunt has also raised delegation of circa ~600KSP from other sources.
Aim of Analysis
• Obtain a general feel for the activity levels on steemhunt
• Find out how much was paid out in rewards by steemhunt
• Find out how much posts to steemhunt earned in total
• See who the movers and shakers are
• Correlation tests on voting habits
• User profiling
Scope of Analysis
The analysis was carried out for the month of October 18. Data from the STEEM blockchain and Coinmarketcap was used and full details of the queries can be found at the bottom of this post.
The value of a vote for steemhunt was taken from steemworld.org on 10 Nov.
Findings
• 57% of steemhunt posts and comments received a vote from @steemhunt.
• @steemhunt votes make up 83% of the gross payouts on steemhunt posts.
• Over US$30.59 in gross payouts was earning by authors using steemhunt.
• positive correlation (0.5546) was found between the % weight of a vote received and the owned SP by the author.
• The user based voted on has relatively the same profiling as the user base posting with the exception of % of posts made via steemhunt relative to all posts made,
Activity on Steemhunt
18.5K posts were made by 980 authors and received 55K comments from 1826 authors and the comments grossed a payout of SBD$11.14 from 86K votes.
The posts also netted over 399K votes with a gross payout of SBD$19.67K.
In US$ this equates to $30.59 in gross payouts.
Votes From Steemhunt
724 distinct Authors on both posts and comments, received in total 36K votes from Steemhunt in October. The average vote weight was 0.96% giving a vote of approx. 1 SBD. In total Steemhunt have funded 25.56K SBD by way of upvotes.
If we look at this in US$ we can see that steemhunt votes have awarded payouts to the tune of US$25.30K
57% of steemhunt posts and comments received a vote from @steemhunt.
@steemhunt votes make up 83% of the funding earning on steemhunt posts and comments
Movers and Shakers
The table below shows the top hunters by way of steemhunt votes received
The most active posters are shown in the table below
The table below shows the hunters most active in comments
Correlation tests on Steemhunt Voting
A series of tests were carried out to see if there is a correlation between steemhunt voting
The first test is to see if there is a correlation between the Average voting weight used by steemhunt and the % of app posts submitted per author that received a vote. A correlation coefficient of -0.107 was found. Therefore we can establish there is no / very weak negative correlation between the voting weight and the % of your posts that get approved.
The second test is to see if there is a correlation between the voting weight used and the % of total posts by an author on STEEM that relate to steemhunt. A correlation coefficient of -0.172 was found which indicates no correlation
The third test is to see if there is a correlation between the owned SP of the posting account and the average weight used by steemhunt on the voting. It appears that there is a positive correlation (0.5546) between these values, which is heavily influenced by 3 outliers. Removing these outliers, we would get a correlation of 0.2.
The forth test looks for a correlation between the voting weight used and the age of the account that is posting the project. An extremely weak correlation can be found.
User Profiling
I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the user profiling of both those supported by Steemhunt and those posting to steemhunt
The Green represents accounts that have received a vote from steemhunt and the blue include all authors posting to steemhunt.
The below histogram shows the % of posts an account made to steemhunt against all their posts on steem. 297 account made >96% of their posts to steemhunt in October. 181 of these were supported. On the other end of the scale 865 people had <=16% of their steem posts to steemhunt and 86 of these were supported. From this we can tell that steemhunt tend to favour loyal users.
The below histogram shows the age of the STEEM account posting to steemhunt. The green showing the spread of account voted for and the blue showing the spread of the age of accounts that posted to steemhunt. Both histograms follow the same pattern
Above we can see the accounts by SP owned and the distribution of both posts and votes seems to be very much in line with each other and the vast majority of accounts have active have 29KSP or less
Below shows the distribution of steemhunt users in terms of powering down
Above shows the distribution of users in terms of those that power up liquid steem.
Conclusion
Steemhunt is an amazing project allowing anyone search fro awesome products and share them on the block. I would very much encourage you to take a look at the project.
There is a positive correlation between the SP owned and the Average weight used when voting by steemhunt. The outliers in this case are as follows
It is also interesting to see with the user profiling, the more exclusive your posts on steem are to steemhunt the more likely it will receive a vote. This suggests they are rewarding loyalty.
During this analysis I also found that users rewarded with have powered down 49k SP while on the other side, users have power up 39K liquid steem in addition to SP growth from Authors and Curators rewards.
Shameless Promotion
Like what we are doing? Dont forget to vote for @steemcommunity as your steem witness.
Data and queries
Data was gathered in Power BI and Excel From Steemsql held and managed by @arcange.
The M code used to get vote information from steemhunt was
let
Source = Sql.Database("vip.steemsql.com", "DBSteem", [Query="SELECT#(lf)*#(lf)FROM #(lf)Txvotes (NOLOCK)#(lf)#(lf)WHERE [voter] in ('steemhunt')#(lf)and CONVERT(DATE,timestamp) BETWEEN '2018-10-01' AND '2018-10-31'"]),
#"Added Custom" = Table.AddColumn(Source, "% weight", each [weight]/10000),
#"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Added Custom",{{"% weight", Percentage.Type}}),
#"Added Custom1" = Table.AddColumn(#"Changed Type", "Current vote worth", each 95.44),
#"Added Custom2" = Table.AddColumn(#"Added Custom1", "approx vote $", each [Current vote worth]*[#"% weight"]),
#"Changed Type1" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(#"Added Custom2",{{"timestamp", type date}, {"approx vote $", type number}})
in
#"Changed Type1"
The M code used to post information to steemhunt was
let
Source = Sql.Database("vip.steemsql.com", "DBSteem", [Query="SELECT#(lf) author,#(lf)json_metadata,#(lf) permlink,#(lf) total_payout_value,#(lf) pending_payout_value,#(lf) net_votes,#(lf) created,#(lf) children,#(lf) Category,#(lf) Depth#(lf)#(lf)FROM comments (NOLOCK)#(lf)where CONVERT(DATE,created) BETWEEN '2018-10-01' AND '2018-10-31' and#(lf)contains (json_metadata, 'steemhunt')#(lf)#(lf)#(lf)#(lf)"]),
#"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Source,{{"created", type date}})
in
#"Changed Type"
The M code used to get coinmarketcap data was
let
Source = Web.Page(Web.Contents("https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/steem-dollars/historical-data/?start=20180101&end=20181031")),
Data0 = Source{0}[Data],
#"Changed Type" = Table.TransformColumnTypes(Data0,{{"Date", type date}, {"Open*", type number}, {"High", type number}, {"Low", type number}, {"Close**", type number}, {"Volume", type number}, {"Market Cap", type number}}),
#"Removed Other Columns" = Table.SelectColumns(#"Changed Type",{"Date", "Close**"})
in
#"Removed Other Columns"
Hi @paulag, interesting work! Again no big surprises in the correlations, luckily. However, I think applying the exact same analysis scheme as for steempress does not give a full picture in this case. I think the data could have been treated a bit more tailored towards the steemhunt operation mode. The top votees and the top commenters are strongly dominated by the steemhunt mod team. I'd be curious to see how the distributions look when treating mods and mod-rewards separately? There are a few "outlier" votes around 70-100% while the vast majority is well below 10% - I assume these outliers are a few promotional votes? Would the correlation results change if those were excluded?
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
yes I looked the outliers and pointed out and have it in the above. Removing these outliers, we would get a correlation of 0.2.
these are the outliers...
Apologies, you are of course right on this point - sorry for missing that!
Thank you for your review, @crokkon! Keep up the good work!
This post got an extra 0 power for following us
Follow @elsurtidor to get biggest votes in your next posts
Impressive analysis as always. Overall, i don't find steemhunt interesting, neither steemmonsters. I just find them idle passtimes for those already on the platform. They are not undertakings to monetize new interest and growth in STEEM IMO.
Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 3 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.
I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 15 SBD worth and should receive 228 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.
I am
TrufflePig
, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
TrufflePig
Hi @paulag!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.954 which ranks you at #90 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 252 contributions, your post is ranked at #23.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Congratulations @paulag! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click here to view your Board of Honor
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
outstanding work! very detail analysis, you make this wonderful!
always love your beautiful informative article. love your style.
Hey, @paulag!
Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!
Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).
Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.
Vote for Utopian Witness!
Great, @paulag! I've meant to dig in to Steemhunt more but haven't. Will use this post to help me understand this STEEM DApp more.
Thank you!!!
This comment was made from https://ulogs.org
good woman, I havent used it myself but it does seem to have loyal users