Moving mountains of Steem

in #steem6 years ago

Do you feel the shift in the markets the last few days? I am not talking the crypto markets, I am talking about those on Steem. The Steem market place is one that is filled with all the emotions of traders poured out into posts of all kinds as they worry about their various kinds of investments and the risks they face. The market palces are driven by sentiment and Steemians are a sentimental bunch. Oops, I mean emotional.

The last few weeks has been a bit of a roller coaster for many by the looks as they try to come to terms with aspects of the platform they may not have faced before and due to he low prices and more people buying in, there is likely a fair bit of concern about, just what they bought into.

What is good to see though is that there is a great deal of discussion and action that has taken place born from the community and several ideas have been floated and gained traction very quickly. One of them I mentioned that I am keen to see happen is the @blocktrades Worker proposal sytem which looks to secure some funding from the Steem blockchain itself and use it to encourage development. The other is the @Steemalliance development group that is forming, which I suggest following to stay in touch with direction.

On top of this, Steemit Inc which has taken some heavy flack over the last few months has changed their structure and welcomes @elipowell into the Managing Director role to take care of the day to day. Both she and @ned were on the SOS talkshow with @pennsif last night and it was quite clear that while there was no hard commit, they are supporting and keen for both the Worker proposal and Steem Alliance to get up and running relatively quickly. @ned even mentioned potential funding in the millions of Steem over time.

While neither of these things might not have been high on the lists of most people a week ago, they are definitely up there with having a chance at greatly inflencing the future direction of this blockchain from the technical and community aspects. What this Steem market really needs is a joining forces of all stakeholders to create a much better position in the future than we are in now. This means across the board, the contributors, developers, investors and the consumers on Steem.

@coingecko released a good post with their Steem report today and I stole an image from it, thanks.

image.png

I found the amount of Dapps and the unique Dapp users interesting as while there are something like 30,000 active posters out of the ~1.2 million accounts, almost half of the total accounts are active Dapp users. That is the various alt accounts and bots at work no doubt which sounds bad but, it is the same on the other platforms too. I found the comparison with TRON interesting as it has the same number of mainnet account wallets, twice the Dapps, twice the transactions yet, only ~1/8th the unique users of the Dapps and 100x the value in USD. What is going on there?

THe other interesting one is Ethereum which has 20x the number of Dapps with 1000+ yet, only twice the unique users of those Dapps with just over 1 million, compared to Steem's, 500,000. That means that while Ethereum Dapps average 1000 unique accounts each, Steem Dapps average 10,000. All of these chains have bots involved.

While TRON and ETH have 6 and 2% of their accounts using Dapps, EOS and Steem are doing well with 27% and 44% respectively. This is going to be one of the differences that a community-backed chain is going to have in the future, usage. Not only usage but on Steem at least, a wide array of usage in areas that are important to the way people actually use the internet already. Digital content is what it is and Steem can service it all.

When it comes to ubiquity, What Steem offers is nothing new, it is already ubiquitous, it just hasn't been attached to the Steem blockchain yet. Having the community and potentially a development fund that is financed and driven by community actions, it has a chance of developing an increasingly strong use case for more and more users and businesses to start utilizing the Steem chain as we go forward.

Combine this with the massive upcoming drive the crypto markets are going to see and, Steem has a chance of luring, landing, schooling and releasing a huge pool of new users into crypto who will further distribute the Steem blockchain and support it through content contribution, business development, investment growth and consumer actions. This will not only stabilize the chain significantly, it will also increasingly creep into the day to day activities of user lives, it will be compelling.

This is Steem, a distributed startup in a distributed startup industry, there are plenty of dramas to come as various incentives conflict but, shake it off. We are at the beginning of the journey only and there is a long way to go. Many of the people here feel they are late to the game, they can no longer make an impact or benefit.

IT IS BULLSHIT. Everyone here is at the pointy end of the future. The mountain just hasn't risen from the seas yet.

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Sort:  

I feel like I've listened in on more Discord chats this week than any time over the past couple of years, and it's been great for morale.

As well as the activity at Steemit Inc, oracle-d (steem business alliance), actifit, steemmonsters, steempeak and a bunch of other apps are busy beavering away, and we have the steemalliance gaining traction fast.

Something's got to stick, right?

Something's got to stick, right?

It only takes one to stick enough and the rest will get stickier because of it. I am hoping that when these groups pull together they can learn to drive together too.

I buy thinking it'll get back to its ATH someday. If steem got back to $8, how much would your holdings be worth? And would you regret not having more?

I regret not having more now ;)

Same here hahah always trying to accumulate my bags

Hi taraz. Looking at the figures nothing is broken and everyone just needs to relax. We haven't even started climbing yet and it will happen at some point.

The climb is going to have it's ups and down but, give it a few years and the view will be completely different.

Some great quotes at the end there... sounds like yr new job is maybe infiltrating ur steem posts...!

Posted using Partiko Android

Job or lack of time to be too flowery ;D

The difference with all the other platforms is its community and the centralized developer. We have an active and pssionate community but no central entity promoting it while the other focused on the latter spending millions to attract developers and users. I’m not complaining as I prefer this structure as it will be fundamentally stronger to scale that the others.

Posted using Partiko iOS

I am hoping that once advertising does start, Steem will have a foundation to actually support users, rather than marketing fluff.

What we need here on Steemit, is more 'smiles'... anything that brings 'that' about, I fully endorse.

Have a happy day, filled with 'smiles'

I smile here daily but unfortunately, I have a face made for radio.

Your face is fine @tarazkp unless you stole that avatar from somewhere?

I hope you didn't misunderstand my comment about the "smiles" remark...I meant it regarding the entire community at large; not a knock to you or your post in any way :>)

Lol, I understood. Perhaps we should have a 'hot or not' avatar rating app? We could be the next Facebook.

Many of the people here feel they are late to the game,

I was talking to someone last month that had no knowledge of crypto. He asked me the same thing, "Am I too late?"

Honestly, this is a great question to ask. How could Bitcoin possibly gain significant value after going from $0 to $20k?

This kind of thinking is rooted in the old paradigm. Look at what crypto is trying to do. Has it accomplished its goal? Are we even close to doing so? No.

Smart-money has a long long long way to go.

It is a great question to ask and the answer is always going to be no. The reason is that in the future when crypto is commonly traded and used, it will be much like cash. No one asks, "is it too late to earn money to spend?" There will come a point where buying doesn't lead to wealth, but it can always lead to financial control.

This went into a topic I consider very serious and I would like to share another perspective. (Yup, I'm all about perspectives it looks like, I even run a project with that same word in the title and it has so much in common, but only in my mind I guess, with what you and others talk about...)

So this other perspective is about positive change in my perspective although it is about a problem. That is not to be neglected if we care about the future here. Anyway, I post a large wall of text I found as the best summary of the problem. If anybody continues to read or another discourse starts after that, I consider myself very lucky.

That belongs to @quillfire and the whole post is here. But let me bring that wall up at last:

I am HUGELY supportive of any and all curation projects ... especially those that involve manual curation (or direct support of manual curation). Indeed, I have argued on countless occasions that High Quality Curators are EVERY BIT AS IMPORTANT to the future of Steemit as are High Quality Content Creators.
But this brings up a HUGE problem. Curation is supposed to be a process of re-enforcing feedback loops ... all of which are crippled on Steemit.
I have won numerous Curies. What happens is that Curie upvotes a post, which triggers an auto-upvote by @hendrickdegrote (a Whale ... and God Bless his soul) which then triggers a couple of Orca auto-upvotes and a couple of hundred Minnow auto-upvotes (most of which are worth less than a penny). At present, you're lucky if this adds up to USD $20. And then ... the process STOPS dead in its tracks. The entire "curation process" is over in a matter of minutes.
Theoretically, Curie's initial manual upvote is supposed to trigger a cascade. Curie and hedrickdegrote bump the post into HOT where many other users see and upvote it. This bumps it into TRENDING where the dynamic repeats itself. The net result is that really high quality content races to the top and gets wide exposure and generous compensation.
And then ... such TRENDING posts (the Best of Steemit) are supposed to start getting shared on other social media platforms and across the Internet more broadly. And this would be MASSIVE free advertising for Steemit which would become known for being a hotbed of GREAT CONTENT.
This would attract new users, especially those capable of creating high quality content and desirous of being compensated for it. These new users would more than offset the price-deflationary effects of an inflationary currency (payouts from the Reward Pool increase the Monetary Supply). And hence, the price of STEEM would increase as demand for the currency rises.
Increasing price of any financial asset draws the attention of investors and financial actors. A higher priced STEEM, driven by the SuperStars, augments the payouts for everyone lower down in the hierarchy. The merit-based higher payouts to SuperStars also provides motivation, and a template, to those desirous of climbing the ladder.
A virtuous cycle.
As discussed earlier, however, the theory is not the reality ... the entire system short-circuits after the first stage of curation. Either a Curie upvote doesn't result in a post's getting into HOT (there isn't enough SP in Curie's Curation trail) or, if it does, nothing then happens because almost no one with substantial upvoting power is interested in curating. (Whales and Orcas control 85% of SP).
Why not?
Because they're instead seeking to generate Passive Income (interest) by delegating to bidbots and other game-rigging mechanisms.
85% of the limited upvoting capital, that is supposed to be used for quality content curation, is instead used for upvote manipulation of one kind or another. Of course, the problem is further magnified by the fact that everyone now knows that there's no correlation between quality and the HOT and TRENDING pages. Personally, I haven't looked at either in at least 9 months. And so, even Minnow and Dolphin SP is not being used to re-enforce Curie's initial curation.
Worst of all, when a prospective user or investor shows up on Steemit to investigate the blockchain, they inevitably click on HOT and TRENDING, expecting to see extraordinary content. Instead, they see utter garbage.
I run an advertising agency ... you only get One Chance to make a FIRST IMPRESSION. Given that their First Impression will be negative, it will be all-but-impossible to get them to return at a later date for a second look. How many people's opinions have already been so poisoned?

Now, I have yet to reach the bottom of his article and my five cents (Alright, literally speaking, I weigh half as much on both accounts combined as of yet) will probably appear there.

The thing is that all of this is quite easy to change once the value of the post isn't the deciding factor but, people keep using Steemit which only uses that metric to sort content.

Total percents of votes is what we have elsewhere, along with shares and comments, probably. Something multifactor? The median of all the reputation that voted for you?

Hi @tarazkp!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.282 which ranks you at #223 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 194 contributions, your post is ranked at #9.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

New people who are just entering Steem should read your post and discover that their voice could be valuable regardless of the amount of Steem they have.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 59895.89
ETH 2419.31
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44