You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How Steem could allow minnows more influence over rewards
The only way is to distribute the steem more naturally, like I wrote here:
https://steemit.com/distribution/@lasseehlers/distribution-analysis
and here:
https://steemit.com/steem/@lasseehlers/when-will-steem-1-cent-my-primitive-estimate-1-february-2017
I believe it will happen naturally, else steem will never hit mainstream.
That is because steem has no contract but SBD for investors. This is equal to keeping dollars, no? Holding steem out of circulation by Austrian principles drives down interest rates. That is the fundamental justification for Steem Power at all. But I think curation is what drives the pyramid upwards. Curators should be also mostly creators. If the math works equal for holding or voting, it becomes a place to park your money. This is how a currency grows. Not by transactions. Savings means more investment. Surplus money held off market to seize opportunity.
That's a lot of information in one comment. You are using the terms quite loosely, I am not saying I don't agree, just need more specification of the arguments.