You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Thinking of Tokenizing
In an open-source permissionless environment you're still going to point the finger at "authority" and make the claim that their product is more valid than someone else's? You need to stop projecting the old paradigm onto this movement.
No one is in charge.
Nothing about SMT is going to make it any less of a "coin factory".
Even the term "coin factory" with a negative connotation is confusing. Aren't coins valuable? Don't factories produce valuable goods efficiently? So you're saying it's a factory that creates value, but that's bad?
I'm having a very hard time understanding this logic.
I have the right to think is a useless coin factory at this stage. From your writing is very noticeable that you not on the same page of my thinking.
That is the beauty of this chain is to be open-minded and accept the opinion of others without judging, have a great Sunday. :)
No, you are not entitled to your opinion.
Seriously though, your opinion is based on what?
Tell me what technical knowledge you're sitting on that makes you think that SteemEngine coins are garbage while SMT coins are golden.
I'm ready to learn. Teach me.
Maybe the product will work in the near future but in the current stage, you can't do anything with a token created on SteemEngine that possess no value. You can't trade it, I can't purchase a coffee as an example, it is only a useless coin in a smart contract off chain of the main chain.
OMG!
You are like straight out of the cookie cutter handbook it's amazing.
I've been rewatching King of the Hill and there is an episode Where they use Bill to make a bunch of money because he is a representation of the average consumer. Perhaps I've been going about this all wrong.