You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Some thoughts about funding SMT's
You can imagine how im agreeing to you right now as im waiting for my ETH token transactiion for the past 2 hours with a 2 dollar transaction fee. 2 dollar transaction fee...
SMT has been talked alot about by @ned. And he seems pretty invested in it. But without it's implementation, I'll always have a healthy amount of skepticism as to whether it really will become a reality.
When SMT does roll out, goodbye ERC-20...
I'm starting to think that SMTs are going to be the catalyst to the bubble popping of many altcoins built on Ethereum.
It definitely will.. entrepreneurial people will start suggesting companies to ICO usint SMT since its way easier and it wont take many SMT to get media attention.. Once that's done its all going uphill.
you mind sharing with me why do you think that @tim3w4rp?
Sure.
Consider Steemhunt, for example.
They will be distributing their own tokens built on top of SMTs, once they go live. Not in a way ICOs on Ethereum work, though. To be able to jump start their business, they came up with the idea of distributing those SMTs to Steem Power delegators.
You delegate to steemhunt -> you gain a share in HUNT tokens. It gets more complicated, hence the link. You can read more there.
The point is, Ethereum does not have the power to do this. There is no delegation there. You simply have to buy the token with ETH.
You could say that I have to buy Steem and you would be right. But the delegation gives you the power to seamlessly transition between projects. Meaning that I have the freedom of taking my money out of certain projects to put in into other in a matter of minutes.