The next little ice age Vol. 54
The next little ice age Vol. 54
57 days without sunspots and increasing.
October 9-2017
Good morning, afternoon, night depending on where the reader is.
We start with the sunspots as always.
After a month of September with much activity in terms of sunspots. We started counting days without sunspots again and are already 57 days so far in 2017. The models offered forecasts of between 51-53 days without sunspots this year. We have to wait until the end of the year to know how far we have departed from the forecasts of the models.
Michelson Doppler Camera (MDI) soho/nasa.
In addition to having the names of groups of sunspots we have in the lower right both the size of the Earth and the size of Jupiter. So we can get an idea of the enormous size of the groups of sunspots.
Image Source soho nasa.
Current image of the Sun in 284 Å taken with the Extreme UV Imaging Telescope (EIT)
Image Source SIDC and SOHO / NASA
The sunspots, or rather the absence of them indicates in which part of the solar cycle of 11 years in which we are.
Image Source windows2universe.com
According to some theories, the Earth's climate is greatly affected by this cycle. More heat during the solar maximum, colder during the solar minimum.
There is much more to tell but this is roughly what I have been trying to explain with the presentation of some scientific studies on this subject.
For more information, read my previous articles.
As for coronal holes we can see in the northern hemisphere of the Sun that coronal hole that will cause at least G1 geomagnetic storm on day 11. The coronal holes look black in this wavelength due to their lower temperature compared to the other zones of the solar corona.
Image Source sdo nasa.
The magnetosphere as always withstanding the current conditions without problems.
Image Source ccmc nasa
Summary
Current conditions of space weather are calm. The noaa gives a 65% probability of storm G1 for day 11, day that is expected the arrival of the fast solar wind coming from the coronal hole. But at the moment the solar wind is at 388km / sec according to the noaa and the proton density is 3.5 protons per cubic centimeter according to the NASA Modeling Center.
Image Source noaa
Image Source ccmc nasa
Arctic ice
Image Source meereisportal.de
The ice accumulated in the Arctic platform has increased 340,000km square in the last two days.Fantastic!!
In the previous post I wrote two days ago the growth of ice was 30,000 square km per day. The growth rate has increased to 170,000 square km per day.
Al Gore is promoting a new documentary. Will he come to warn of the dangers of a solar minimum?..
The rate of ice growth on the Arctic platform is simply incredible.
Good news. The Arctic is not thawing but is freezing with the highest growth rate of the satellite era.
Enjoy your life. Enjoy your day.
Images SDO official NASA link.
https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dashboard/
Graphic Images NASA Modeling Center. Ccmc.
https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ccmc-swrt-display/SWMF-RCM/index.php
Noaa
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts#
So, the climate change, (I dont know if you say that on English, sorry Im Salvadorean) its a lie?
The climate change is happening. The climate has always changed.
The lie is, that man is responsible for the climate change.
All the data backing the theory that man is responsible is, at most, from the late 1860s, 1970s or 1980s, depending on what is being measured. While the sun has a 11+- year solar cycles, it is obvious that there are larger cycles in the 100, 200, 500, 1,000 and 5,000 year ranges.
Also, the models used to back the theory of man-made climate change having been able to predict anything, which means the models are false. The Earth is cooling back down. In fact, the low and high temperatures seem to be leveling out, so that there isn't a huge difference between lows and highs. This would make it seem as if the climate is getting less chaotic, which is against what the man-made climate change believers preach.
Thank you Dean! Well said.
The Solar activity will determine the thermal tendency of the Earth and not the human being. Allow me to explain this on Spanish to him.
Me tomo la licencia de escribirte en Español para que puedas enterder mejor mi punto de vista. Punto de vista apoyado por numerosos estudios científicos realizados en países muy diferentes.
Los cambios en el clima de la Tierra se vienen produciendo desde el bombardeo tardío temprano que es el punto en el que los geofisicos determinan el nacimiento de nuestro planeta.
A partir de ese momento nunca en la historia de la Tierra el clima se ha mantenido de forma estable. Por lo tanto el cambio climático es totalmente cierto. Y de hecho nunca ha dejado de cambiar. Ni parara de hacerlo.
Para acercarnos más al momento presente, te diré que, el ser humano vive en la tierra entre dos periodos glaciares.
Hubo almenos tres glaciaciones totales o parciales después de que se extinguirán los dinosaurios. Y habrá otra glaciación en el futuro.
Esas eras glaciares poco o muy poco tuvieron que ver con los cambios químicos de la atmósfera. Las teorías del CO2 son instrumentos políticos y económicos que poco o nada tienen que ver con la realidad.
Las teorías del calentamiento global surgieron hace unos años gracias al aumento de temperatura que sufrió la tierra después de unos mínimos solares ocurridos:
1- 1645-1715 Mínimo de Maunder
2- 1790-1820 Mínimo de Dalton
Durante esos periodos la temperatura de la Tierra descendido notablemente, y ha estado aumentando hasta la actualidad.
Pero para que te hagas una idea la temperatura de la tierra durante el dominio del imperio Romano fue muchos grados más alta de lo que es hoy en día.
Pero para saber más, te recomiendo que leas mis anteriores post, encontrarás unos cuantos estudios científicos que te ayudarán a comprender mejor.
Cambio climático = Si, por supuesto.
Calentamiento global = No, falso.
@originalworks come to me!
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @teks to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!
For more information, Click Here! || Click here to participate in the @OriginalWorks sponsored writing contest(125 SBD in prizes)!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!
@royrodgers has voted on behalf of @minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowponds team on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond.
As a follower of @followforupvotes this post has been randomly selected and upvoted! Enjoy your upvote and have a great day!
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by teks from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
Wow. A perfect fit with the theory.
58 days by now. Here comes the solar minimum.