Sixteen Tons Part 2: The Environmental and Human Costs of Coal

in #science6 years ago (edited)

Part 1

In any discussion of the negative effect of human use of coal, it's almost hard to know where to start. Considering its current prominence in the media, however, let's start with coal's contributions to climate change.

image.png

To sum coal's contribution to climate change up quickly: It's the single largest contributor of CO2 to the atmosphere, bar nothing. It comprises 46% of all total carbon dioxide emissions globally and 72% of all global carbon emissions from the electrical generation sector. (Those numbers vary at the nation level- in the US, coal makes up around 25% of all carbon emissions from the electricity sector.) Coal produces nearly twice as much CO2 as natural gas per unit of electricity generated- and natural gas can hardly be called green energy. How's coal so good at emitting C02? That's easy- it's made mostly of carbon. That's the whole reason it's a good energy source.

So coal emits lots of greenhouse gas, that's no surprise. What else does it emit? The big one is sulfur dioxide, SO2. Sulfur dioxide is a weird one- at first it actually forms compounds in the atmosphere that reduce solar heating. Within a very short time, however, they precipitate out of the atmosphere in the form of acid rain, while the CO2 stays behind for centuries. And, just in case you weren't already aware, acid rain is really bad. It can kill crops, cause severe damage to infrastructure, reduce groundwater quality, ruin soil, cause increased weathering and erosion, hurt human health, and damage local ecosystems- especially insects and aquatic life. It's also extremely bad for corals and shell producing organisms. Coal burning also emits arsenic, mercury, lead, nitrogen oxides, particulates, other heavy metals, and radiation. (Living by a coal power plant actually exposes you to more radiation than living near most nuclear power plants!) These emissions have been linked to asthma, heart problems, cancer, pregnancy complications, and many more health conditions.

image.png
A coal power plant in Ohio. [Image source]

So burning coal is bad for the environment, but what about mining it? Well, it turns out that's pretty awful stuff too. Methane is often trapped in or near coal seams, and it can be released via mining. Methane is terrifying stuff- it's 86 times stronger than CO2 at trapping heat over a 20 year period and 34 times as effective over a century. About 10 percent of US methane emissions come from coal mining.

Coal mining is also devastating to local water supplies. Coal mines have to regularly be drained of water, and what comes out is nasty, nasty stuff. Coal mine drainage is highly acidic- it's been known to alter the pH of nearby streams to the same level as VINEGAR. That doesn't sound so bad at first- we eat vinegar all the time- but have you ever tried keeping a fish or watering a plant with vinegar? They die right away. Even just having too acidic of a diet is incredibly bad for humans. On top of that, coal mine drainage also conains arsenic, copper, lead, uranium, thorium, and other nasty toxins, and tend to horribly poison the land.

image.png
Acidic mine drainage in Ohio. [Image source]

There's also the nasty tendency of coal mines to catch on fire. Some coal seam fires can burn for decades or even centuries. They're not raging blazes, generally, thanks to the limited oxygen, more long, smoldering burns. Burning Mountain in Australia has been burning continuously for 6,000 years, though it's a naturally occurring coal seam fire. A coal seam in Germany has been burning since 1668. There are nearly 200 known coal seam fires in America right now. China has over a hundred major coal seam fires and countless smaller ones. Coal seam fires have tons of nasty environmental effects- they destroy the local ecosystems, cause ground collapse, and emit carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide. Coal seam fires are believed to cause around 1% of the total C02 emissions from fossil fuels each year. They're incredibly hard to put out, as well.

The method of mining is also important. Mountain-top removal mining is one of the most environmentally destructive actions taken by humans. Many coal seams in mountains- usually thin ones are inaccessible to normal mining techniques. To access them, the tops of the mountains are completely deforested via clear-cutting, then explosives are used to remove the tops of the mountains. This can remove up to 600 feet in elevation. Mountain top removal mining is horrendous. It contaminates local groundwater and streams. It destroys local ecosystems. It releases huge amounts of airborne dust and toxins. It leaves behind a devastated wasteland- dumping Agent Orange on an area instead might be less destructive.

image.png
A coal seam fire in China. [Image source]

As if all those environmental impacts weren't enough, there are coal ash slurry spills. After coal is mined, it neeeds to be washed to reduce impurities. The resultant nasty material is stored along with fly ash slurry, which is ash from coal burning filled with water. Either is horrifyingly bad for people and the environment, and the coal industry tends to store them in immensely toxic ponds and behind poorly constructed dams. Floods of these materials are a constant danger in coal country. In 2008, the Kingston Fossil Plant in Tennessee had its fly ash slurry containment fail, releasing a volume 101 times that of the Exxon Valdez spill. It damaged dozens of homes and horribly contaminated the local environment, killing countless fish and poisoning rivers and groundwater.

Coal mines have countless hazards. The mines tend to fill up with water, since water runs downhill, and underground is definitely downhill. Coal isn't uniform- the fossilized tree trunks found all throughout coal seams often simply break loose and drop into the mine, often crushing workers. (The round bottom of the tree, visible from below, is known as a kettle bottom.) Cave-ins are common. We can go on listing hazards for a while, but coal mining is a dangerous job. It's better these days than it used to be, thanks to basic safety standards being administered, thankfully.

image.png
Some of the aftermath of the Kingston Coal Ash Spill. [Image source]

The biggest threat for coal miners, however, is black lung. Working in a coal mine everyday leads to miners' lungs being coated with coal dust. It's called black lung because it literally turns miners lungs completely black from their original healthy pink. Black lung causes inflammation, fibrosis, lesions, cancer, promotes infections, and in severe cases, even causes necrosis. It's estimated that over 1,500 former employees of coal mines die from black lung in America every single year, and the number is well into the tens of thousands worldwide.

Coal mining also has horrifying effects on the communities it occurs in. It literally poisons them- coal mining towns have some of the lowest average lifespans and more chronic health problems than any other communities in America. When the coal runs out, the coal companies simply leave, taking all the jobs with them, leaving behind communities that are poisoned in every sense of the word and economically destitute.

Next time: The Future of Coal.


Bibliography:
Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt, by Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=75&t=11
https://endcoal.org/climate-change/
https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-impacts#.WntW7edG2Uk
https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-and-other-fossil-fuels/coal-air-pollution#.WntXiedG2Uk
https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-and-other-fossil-fuels/coal-water-pollution#.WntoCOdG2Uk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalworker%27s_pneumoconiosis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston_Fossil_Plant_coal_fly_ash_slurry_spill
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_rain

Sort:  

I thought the acid rain was carboxylic acid. I didn't know that it is actually sulfuric acid with carbon dioxide being trapped in the atmosphere. Continued use of coal may return the Earth to the lignin infested world of pre-pangea, since we humans seem intent on killing all the trees that could have used the carbon dioxide being flushed into the atmosphere.

I suppose advocates for coal use can be termed epochal reactionaries. Having killed-off all current life and having returned the planet to its original environment, maybe the life cycle will begin anew, when the last human gasps his last breath of the prehistoric atmosphere. Maybe the next sentient being will be a better steward of the gift from his creator.

Your post has been personally reviewed and was considered to be a well written article about geology!
You received a 80.0% upvote since you are a member of geopolis.
To read more about us and what we do, click here.
https://steemit.com/geopolis/@geopolis/geopolis-the-community-for-global-sciences-update-3
If you do not want us to upvote and comment on your posts concerning earth and earth sciences, please reply stop to this comment and we will no longer bother you with our love ❤️

I wonder why we still use it when there are so many alternative sources of energy.
You made an in-depth study, an excellent job!

We still use it because there's money to be made!

That's definitely one aspect of it but there is another layer to it. Coal as a form of energy has already had over a century of development, everything from the burning to the mining is at a point which it can done cheaply and thus maximize profits.

The low cost of extraction also makes it a perfect cash cow for undeveloped countries, or even areas in developed nations which have little industry. Areas which take advantage of the resource usually have a boom which is followed by a bust as soon as the easiest coal is taken. It also is a double edged sword because areas become reliant on the coal as a resource seeing it as a source of GDP and jobs, and because of that lose sight or completely disregard the development of alternatives.

Coal is viewed with rose colored glasses because many people can remember a time during a coal boom which may have been good for the local store but for the miners it was definitely a different story. To me Coal is simply another gold rush idea, get in there make as much money as possible and abandon the people and the infrastructure as soon as profits dip. For some reason though it is glamorized as this opportunity which could be focused into any alternative.

All that too! The people hurt most by coal are often its fiercest defenders, because coal is often the only thing bringing money into a region.

I've seen it first hand. I've lived in and near places in Canada which have whole towns that developed because of mining and as soon as the industry dried up were left with nothing. Well not exactly nothing towns full of unemployment and old company duplexes. Too many eggs in one basket leaving these places in dire need of industries other than call centers and tourism.

Woo good times!

As always, wonderful job. Complete no-holds-barred take on the current climate of coal production. And yet we drop out of the Paris Agreement because it would "hurt the economy".

very insightful. Seems I will start valuing my coals now . HAHA
thank you for this

Congratulations! This post has been chosen as one of the daily Whistle Stops for The STEEM Engine!

You can see your post's place along the track here: The Daily Whistle Stops, Issue # 41 (2/10/18)

The STEEM Engine is an initiative dedicated to promoting meaningful engagement across Steemit. Find out more about us and join us today!

What an un-pretty picture you painted so well here @mountainwashere!

There is sadly in sunny and windy and ocean stream energy bound South Africa not enough political will to do the right thing...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 67900.86
ETH 3250.85
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.63