You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Steemit brand is losing value as we speak!
I mentioned to you last time already that you should be careful how to deal with people. I downvoted this because the post's sole purpose is to start another whitch hunt, which hurts the community way more than anything else and doesn't help resolve any discrepancies ..
Why not put your time into something constructive?
I think we must be concerned more about him...
https://steemit.com/steemit-abuse/@sirwinchester/re-warning-scammer-with-reputation-score-7-user-moonflower-is-fake-yet-a-7
I don't think you are acting fairly. @michaelx has been way more aggressive and childish in the last few days. Why you are upvoting him instead of downvoting if you really care how individuals deal with other people?
He has even threatened with legal actions: https://steemit.com/abuse/@anduweb/i-m-being-threatened-by-michaelx-he-says-he-ll-sue-me-if-i-spread-rumors-of-him-being-a-scammer
I really can't understand how you can tolerate that kind of behavior and but still downvote @r4fken.
I sure did @samupaha : https://steemit.com/abuse/@anduweb/i-m-being-threatened-by-michaelx-he-says-he-ll-sue-me-if-i-spread-rumors-of-him-being-a-scammer#@michaelx/re-anduweb-i-m-being-threatened-by-michaelx-he-says-he-ll-sue-me-if-i-spread-rumors-of-him-being-a-scammer-20160805t105005093z
Read why.
You seem to have a problem with everything I do or say, yet no problem with your friends telling people they will rape them, assault them, or otherwise.
Also, that conversation qualifies as assault in US law, and I am within every right to press charges.
@xeroc you are 100% right in downvoting.
Steemit should protect its brand from crap like this. But good for you, censoring your little world.
This was all new to me. I read the original article from @michaelx and your response to it but I don't see your reasoning behind being so against it. Is it because you don't like marketing? What is it about @michaelx ' s idea that is so "scammy" / wrong to you?
As @xeroc mentioned, you have to be really careful when you make accusations against people. You need to back up your words with evidence or substance for readers to understand why you are calling something a "scam."
Agree. Danka.
Downvoting my reply to your comment? How low can you go. Even the worst trashy pulp magazines are obligated to let their victims publish a reply.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, just as everyone is entitled to vote. If you are aggressive for no reason simply because I asked a question, then I will surely downvote you.
Yeah, I'm officially done. If one rich guy can decide whether a post can be shown or not, then fuck it. You deserve no better than to go down in the burning ship you set on fire yourself. I hope your money burns with it, so you can experience the trolling that normal people have to put up with.
More evidence and less emotion would be helpful here. I'm also passionate about protecting the brand because I think there's a cool thing being started here. To me, the way you're approaching this situation doesn't seem like an adult having an adult conversation. Someone asked you a specific question and you replied with censorship, emotional outbursts (from my perspective), etc. I think your case would be better served via reasoned dialogue. If you've moved on already, then I guess that's fine, and you won't have to worry about the brand anymore.
Ouch. I didn't attack you at all, I just asked for clarification and gave an opinion on how to be careful with your words. But then you respond with:
Downvoting for unneeded aggression and ill-will =(