Weinstein is a multi millionaire. He has assistants and toadies and couriers and chauffeurs. If he wanted to carry two heavy books he'd get someone else to do it. Unless of course he was sending a message to his political masters - the globalist cabal.
His choice of books is interesting. Rogers and Hammerstein were often criticised for their progressive or liberal bias in their works. Indeed some conservative groups tried to ban their work from being performed, yet the maintained their politics which some now see as pro communist.
In contrast, Elia Kazan, when questioned at the HUAC hearings about leftist subversion, chose to inform on various colleagues for being communists.
By overtly carrying these two books, is Weinstein telling his political masters that he is about to make a choice and that he'd appreciate an incentive to follow the Rogers and Hammerstein's example?Time will tell....
Interesting... The two books do seem to indicate two different historical paths from which he can choose. I'm not sure that his political masters are going to be able to help him though, because of the giant rut they've driven themselves into and spinning their wheels, making the rut deeper and impossible to escape without a tow truck. What could the tow truck be, that would be able to pull Harvey out of his rut?
Yes, it does look fairly bleak for them. Maybe it's an attempt for a kind of plea bargain. 'Help me' with a lesser sentence and I'll keep schtum.
You have a minor misspelling in the following sentence:
It should be chauffeurs instead of chauffers.To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.
Verrry interesting note.
As one of the most successful indie film producers of all time, he of all people understands the importance of symbolism in storytelling.
Great post!!!!!
Top tier theory for sure. Curious if there is any truth in it and if so how much will come out.