Most western people think it is fair when 52 rich countries goes to war against one single poor country.
Many people think that when USA with its 52 rich countries goes to war against one single poor country, that it is one nation against another, and forget that it actually is 52 rich countries that have decided to terrorise one single country.
On top of that they usually get many of their NATO countries to join their terror.
So usually it is in fact around 70 rich countries against one poor country.
This is mainly because 99% of all news paper and news in the west have all their sources from one single propaganda source named Reuters..
It is our duty as good humans to make this clear for as many people as possible. :)
(picture source: Google image)
Upvote
i agree with you...carry on...
is this how,salmani anduway, steemit @haika
Congratulations @rezpatex! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPwho is this "poor" country?
If you have to ask.
I know 100% for sure that there is no point in answering this..
But ok, i can waste my words anyway.
Is Afghanistan, Libya and Yemen good enough examples?
But you are right, some times it is because a poor country have found richness in form of oil or something else that they get attacked, so usa can loot their new resources.
So they dont HAVE to be rich to be terrorised by usa.
Other times it is simply to expand the borders of the world empire they try to build.
well if youre going to be NASTY about it...
Its even more nasty to pretend that your terror is a nice and fair thing.. ;)
(I take it for granted that you are a american since you try to defend their world terror..)
Let's see...so far I've written
who is this "poor" country?
then you attacked me so I replied
well if you're going to be NASTY about it...
Then you attacked me again
Now what are you going to do?
It was the word "poor"
That made it clear that you indicated that what i said was very wrong...
Wasn`t that why you put those sign around the word poor?
And feel free to explain why it is a good thing that USA attack and occupy any of the nations they are attacking or already are occupying all over this planet. :)
I dont understand that last answer.
But shall we try to start all over in a more friendly way?
And i shall try to not let my feelings get in the way of more neutral but strait answers. :)
I am pretty passionate when it comes to try to stop the governments to stop killing people.
And i truly can not understand those who support this even if i try.
ahh i think i understand your answer now.
And the reason i have put those sign around the word "news" is because what comes from Reuters seldom are news, but mostly propaganda lies.. ;)
So i use those to make it clear that to use the word news about Reuters "news" are completely wrong. ;)
And that is why i thought that your very first comment said that i was completely wrong.
Was i wrong about that?
Trying to delete commercial i no longer support and that does not work as they first promised.
I am talking about this Originalworks.
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @rezpatex to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!
For more information, Click Here!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!