If you have to ask.
I know 100% for sure that there is no point in answering this..
But ok, i can waste my words anyway.
Is Afghanistan, Libya and Yemen good enough examples?
But you are right, some times it is because a poor country have found richness in form of oil or something else that they get attacked, so usa can loot their new resources.
So they dont HAVE to be rich to be terrorised by usa.
Other times it is simply to expand the borders of the world empire they try to build.
Its even more nasty to pretend that your terror is a nice and fair thing.. ;)
(I take it for granted that you are a american since you try to defend their world terror..)
Let's see...so far I've written who is this "poor" country?
then you attacked me so I replied well if you're going to be NASTY about it...
Then you attacked me again
Now what are you going to do?
And feel free to explain why it is a good thing that USA attack and occupy any of the nations they are attacking or already are occupying all over this planet. :)
But shall we try to start all over in a more friendly way?
And i shall try to not let my feelings get in the way of more neutral but strait answers. :)
I am pretty passionate when it comes to try to stop the governments to stop killing people.
And i truly can not understand those who support this even if i try.
If you have to ask.
I know 100% for sure that there is no point in answering this..
But ok, i can waste my words anyway.
Is Afghanistan, Libya and Yemen good enough examples?
But you are right, some times it is because a poor country have found richness in form of oil or something else that they get attacked, so usa can loot their new resources.
So they dont HAVE to be rich to be terrorised by usa.
Other times it is simply to expand the borders of the world empire they try to build.
well if youre going to be NASTY about it...
Its even more nasty to pretend that your terror is a nice and fair thing.. ;)
(I take it for granted that you are a american since you try to defend their world terror..)
Let's see...so far I've written
who is this "poor" country?
then you attacked me so I replied
well if you're going to be NASTY about it...
Then you attacked me again
Now what are you going to do?
It was the word "poor"
That made it clear that you indicated that what i said was very wrong...
Wasn`t that why you put those sign around the word poor?
And feel free to explain why it is a good thing that USA attack and occupy any of the nations they are attacking or already are occupying all over this planet. :)
I dont understand that last answer.
But shall we try to start all over in a more friendly way?
And i shall try to not let my feelings get in the way of more neutral but strait answers. :)
I am pretty passionate when it comes to try to stop the governments to stop killing people.
And i truly can not understand those who support this even if i try.
I shall treat you with the caution I would use toward anyone else who has attacked me unprovoked.
ahh i think i understand your answer now.
And the reason i have put those sign around the word "news" is because what comes from Reuters seldom are news, but mostly propaganda lies.. ;)
So i use those to make it clear that to use the word news about Reuters "news" are completely wrong. ;)
And that is why i thought that your very first comment said that i was completely wrong.
Was i wrong about that?