Paying the invoice - Fear mongering

in #politics5 years ago

It's not even shocking anymore, and why should it be? I mean, yes it's horrible, its tragic, it breaks our hearts, but it's not something we thought would not happen again. Here we are, two hate crimes in one single weekend.



Some time ago, I recorded a short video on the cost of populism. Even though my initial motivation was not directly connected to these types of events, it's without a doubt quite relevant to the ongoing conversation. You see, we live in a world where media and politics benefit from fear. If people are not scared, they are not paying attention, they are not clicking the links, and that hurts the bottom dollar.

Almost without exception politicians play the game. They know how to rally people, how to gain support, and they know the most effective tactic is othering and fear mongering. The cost of this tactic is not only steep, it's absolutely reprehensible.

How many times will be look at the evidence, and ignore the rhetoric that pushed people to act like this? Otherwise normal people, going to a baseball game to shoot at an "evil politician" or kids who are barely old enough to drink killing people to punish society and so forth. What is the common theme here? Do we even know?

Yes we could talk about white supremacy, radical islam, etc, until we are blue in the face, but their similarities, the common theme, if you will, is "the othering". Aren't we all in this together? Why can't we see the cost we are paying for failing to address the core issues here?

We should face the fact that special interest groups have made conversations around the topic almost impossible. If you dare to bring up questions on gun reform, the NRA and those who've fallen for the populist message "they are gonna take your guns" will attack you, as if you've sided with an evil government trying to kill you in your sleep.

How did we get here to begin with? Nobody gets upset at the fact that you must pass a driver's exam to drive a vehicle. At least I've not met someone who does. Why would it be unreasonable to have background checks? Why can't this even be brought up when 90% of people, of voters, think it to be reasonable?

I realize some people might get upset and tell me how it would not stop a determined shooter from enacting his terror. I guess that's true. But we can't deny statistics either, we can't look at numbers from other countries that have them and say they don't work at all.



To me it's not about "taking people's guns" as the fear mongers would say. It's about trying to make sure that mostly responsible gun owners are the ones that have them. The people that store them safely, as to prevent situations like the 73 kids who died playing with them in 2018 here in the US.

It absolutely blows my mind that we have lists with names of people who can't fly, who cannot get on an airplane because they are tagged by the FBI as too dangerous. But, these same people can walk into a gunshow and buy themselves an assault weapon without much trouble. How is this reasonable? How does this make any sense?

I'm also aware that some people might point out the reason why the 2nd amendment is so important, the idea that we the people can defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. Listen, I get it, but we also need to be realistic about it. The average Joe might stack up on AR-15s all his life, and he would not last a day against the US Military aka Tyrannical government, and I say this as someone who does not succumb to the fear of our government trying to take me out or making me infertile by putting chemicals in the sky or water. (Yes, all these beliefs seem to be bundled up for these people)

I won't go as far as saying that thoughts and prayers are useless, but they are surely not enough. That being said, I can almost guarantee, it will be another couple of weeks before the next one, and the cycle , the political football and all the stupidity surrounding this discourse will be recycled yet again.

Here are two beliefs nobody who is mentally consistent can hold. The government is inept and useless, and it's also conspiring with a coordinated master plan to enslave us all. I guess it's time we pick a lane.... or don't...

MenO

Sort:  

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

3D printed firearms are very quickly making this whole debate moot.
Until then, Defense Distributed's Ghost Gunner milling machines are selling like hotcakes; each able to machine thousands of unregistered AR-15 lower receivers.
Gun control is being limewired; and you can't unring that bell.

At the core of the Colonial revolt are malcontented rebellion against their rightful lord and license to indulge in rampant resource extraction even at the cost of genocidal wars. The paranoid defiance of 'Muricans against any government public safety policy derives from the above fundamental foundational character of the rebellious Colonies. The Colonials refuse to admit their rebellious and genocidal past; rather they celebrate their crimes, denying even the debt owed to those whom they enslaved for two centuries. When their circumstances become unfavorable, many cling to "their guns and their god" (as one prominent 'Murican politician remarked), projecting their genocidal tendencies and vices onto the state institutions. Until the Colonies reconcile their checkered past honestly, they will be permanently stuck in adolescent rebellion against imaginary goverment conspiracies.

Wow. That was so far from the point you were able to add completely unrelated matters almost seamlessly.

I dare you to name my 'rightful lord'.

Protip: it's me. I can name yours. It's you. Keep doing you and revealing your merit by the consequences thereof. Regardless of what you say, that's what's gonna happen. That's life.

"Nobody gets upset at the fact that you must pass a driver's exam to drive a vehicle. At least I've not met someone who does."

Yes, you have. I just don't drone on about it. I taught my kids to drive by letting them buy their own vehicles from their own wages at about ~10yo and driving them around themselves the cat trails on my acreage . They didn't need a license to drive their own rigs on private property, and experience is the best teacher. By the time they needed to get a license to drive on public roads, they knew what mistakes to not make at highway speeds from making them at ten miles an hour on the crappiest roads anyone ever drove on.

Also, plenty of folks drive around today without licenses. Until they get caught, which crappy drivers often do. You don't need a license to drive, and that's a fact.

There are plenty of things you mentioned in this post I vehemently disagree with, but Imma check myself, because I'm not competent to think for you. You do that just fine. I just think you're unaware of data that would dramatically alter your perspective, particularly regarding firearms ownership. If you take a look at data regarding how often firearms are used to prevent crimes, the paltry number of accidents and actual crimes committed with firearms pales to insignificance. They're far more beneficial in the hands of ordinary folks than they are harmful in the hands of villains.

More to the point, just as I discussed regarding driving, you need no license to possess weapons, and more importantly yet, this:

guncontrol.jpg

Bad actors aren't going to obey gun laws, because they're intent on committing crimes already, so making it more difficult for everyone to possess guns only provides them more helpless victims to harm, because folks intent on abiding by laws will.

Fear is my best friend. IME, almost every mistake I've ever made was a direct result of lack of fear. Fools and angels, so on, so forth. Just because we're not afraid does not make us safe.

The typical libertarian/anarchist argument against any policy regarding public security. By the above logic, societies ought not even have laws regarding murder, theft, rape, pollution, extortion, etc. since "bad actors" will likely not obey them either. For that matter, judicial institution will also be unnecessary, since the society will no longer have any laws to adjudicate. All social conflict will have to be resolved via violence and coersion by stronger "sovereign individuals" against weaker "sovereign individuals." The only "freedom" humanist malcontents offer for men is ways in which they can be exploited and killed.

A million rotting Syrian corpses bear mute witness to the humanist lunacy of "freedom" from law, order, and government. Tens of thousands of Colonials die each year as a sacrifice to the weapons "rights" religion, the tenets of which are essentially treasonous. Rebellion on demand is about which the gun fanatics in 'Murica prattle, as if a nation-state can exist within the chaos of such whimsical fancy.

Since you and your progeny owe no allegience to your sociocultural matrix, why even obey (oh no! The dreaded "o" word!) traffic laws? Why stop at red and proceed on green? Wouldn't drinking and driving must also be allowed to prevent any infringement on human rights? By your logic, the sober driver ought to be more fearful when driving.

Humanism and its tenents of "freedom" is the greastest threat to the continued survival of the human race.

"All social conflict will have to be resolved via violence and coersion by stronger "sovereign individuals" against weaker "sovereign individuals."

Pretending to be retarded isn't really pretending at all. Syria is not wracked with debate between humanists and monarchists, but by the weapons provided by covert government agents to terrorists. Since you claim those government agents are acting upon the authority of rightful lords, Syria is exactly the society you propose we all work towards and provide as our legacy to our posterity.

If you're not afraid, you're not intelligent. Death is the only guarantee in life. It is your refusal to acknowledge actual physical reality as the true mechanism of power that dooms you and your ilk to vainly clutch at philosophy, sophistry to be honest, as salvation.

There is no salvation but what you make with your own hands. Physics is enabling our hands better every day to craft our distributed power. No words you issue will change that. Plan accordingly.

Your indoctrination to the ideology of freedom blind you to reality. Without a judicial institution to resolve social conflicts, violence will be the only recourse. Singing kumbaya by the camp fire is no solution to the inevitable social conflict that will need to be resolved either via violence or submission to the judgment of your betters. Your fanatical belief in failed and flawed ideology prevents you extrapolating inevitable real world consequences of your ludicrous religion.

The Syrian malcontents were duped by the humanist West into rebelling against the established order. It is your humanist muck that have sent agents to destabilise the once prosperous nation of Syria with meaningless promises of freedom, democracy, human rights. The fools in Hong Kong has similarly been conned into destroying their own homes for no other gain than the promise meaningless drivel of freedom garners. Everywhere your humanism has infected the minds of susceptible youths, death, destruction, and chaos ensues. Syria is the result of humanist meddling, which is the legach your religion.

So committed to the lunacy of dictating to Heaven your whims, that humanists have forgotten the concept of right and wrong, good and evil. The rightful and legitimate authority attempting to restore law and order is held in equivalence to rebellious malcontents burning their own society to ash. All the ills of the world stem from men not knowing their proper place within creation.

You continually expound on my views, when my view is that my views don't matter. What does matter is tech enabling people to prevent their wealth from being parasitized.

Address that matter, and we'll have something substantive to discuss, rather than vain puffery about philosophy.

67727925_10219478485334524_6614508974555267072_n.jpg

Dear @meno

You see, we live in a world where media and politics benefit from fear.

You nailed it. I realized that more time I spent watching media and paying attention to politics - more I'm afraid of upcoming future...

Sometimes I really envy those people who are simply ... unaware. Yes. Unaware would be a good word.

ps. Just signed up to your youtube channel.

Yours,
Piotr

Hi @meno!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.044 which ranks you at #321 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 4 places in the last three days (old rank 325).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 183 contributions, your post is ranked at #23.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.030
BTC 64876.28
ETH 2650.41
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.81