RE: Paying the invoice - Fear mongering
"Nobody gets upset at the fact that you must pass a driver's exam to drive a vehicle. At least I've not met someone who does."
Yes, you have. I just don't drone on about it. I taught my kids to drive by letting them buy their own vehicles from their own wages at about ~10yo and driving them around themselves the cat trails on my acreage . They didn't need a license to drive their own rigs on private property, and experience is the best teacher. By the time they needed to get a license to drive on public roads, they knew what mistakes to not make at highway speeds from making them at ten miles an hour on the crappiest roads anyone ever drove on.
Also, plenty of folks drive around today without licenses. Until they get caught, which crappy drivers often do. You don't need a license to drive, and that's a fact.
There are plenty of things you mentioned in this post I vehemently disagree with, but Imma check myself, because I'm not competent to think for you. You do that just fine. I just think you're unaware of data that would dramatically alter your perspective, particularly regarding firearms ownership. If you take a look at data regarding how often firearms are used to prevent crimes, the paltry number of accidents and actual crimes committed with firearms pales to insignificance. They're far more beneficial in the hands of ordinary folks than they are harmful in the hands of villains.
More to the point, just as I discussed regarding driving, you need no license to possess weapons, and more importantly yet, this:
Bad actors aren't going to obey gun laws, because they're intent on committing crimes already, so making it more difficult for everyone to possess guns only provides them more helpless victims to harm, because folks intent on abiding by laws will.
Fear is my best friend. IME, almost every mistake I've ever made was a direct result of lack of fear. Fools and angels, so on, so forth. Just because we're not afraid does not make us safe.
The typical libertarian/anarchist argument against any policy regarding public security. By the above logic, societies ought not even have laws regarding murder, theft, rape, pollution, extortion, etc. since "bad actors" will likely not obey them either. For that matter, judicial institution will also be unnecessary, since the society will no longer have any laws to adjudicate. All social conflict will have to be resolved via violence and coersion by stronger "sovereign individuals" against weaker "sovereign individuals." The only "freedom" humanist malcontents offer for men is ways in which they can be exploited and killed.
A million rotting Syrian corpses bear mute witness to the humanist lunacy of "freedom" from law, order, and government. Tens of thousands of Colonials die each year as a sacrifice to the weapons "rights" religion, the tenets of which are essentially treasonous. Rebellion on demand is about which the gun fanatics in 'Murica prattle, as if a nation-state can exist within the chaos of such whimsical fancy.
Since you and your progeny owe no allegience to your sociocultural matrix, why even obey (oh no! The dreaded "o" word!) traffic laws? Why stop at red and proceed on green? Wouldn't drinking and driving must also be allowed to prevent any infringement on human rights? By your logic, the sober driver ought to be more fearful when driving.
Humanism and its tenents of "freedom" is the greastest threat to the continued survival of the human race.
Pretending to be retarded isn't really pretending at all. Syria is not wracked with debate between humanists and monarchists, but by the weapons provided by covert government agents to terrorists. Since you claim those government agents are acting upon the authority of rightful lords, Syria is exactly the society you propose we all work towards and provide as our legacy to our posterity.
If you're not afraid, you're not intelligent. Death is the only guarantee in life. It is your refusal to acknowledge actual physical reality as the true mechanism of power that dooms you and your ilk to vainly clutch at philosophy, sophistry to be honest, as salvation.
There is no salvation but what you make with your own hands. Physics is enabling our hands better every day to craft our distributed power. No words you issue will change that. Plan accordingly.
Your indoctrination to the ideology of freedom blind you to reality. Without a judicial institution to resolve social conflicts, violence will be the only recourse. Singing kumbaya by the camp fire is no solution to the inevitable social conflict that will need to be resolved either via violence or submission to the judgment of your betters. Your fanatical belief in failed and flawed ideology prevents you extrapolating inevitable real world consequences of your ludicrous religion.
The Syrian malcontents were duped by the humanist West into rebelling against the established order. It is your humanist muck that have sent agents to destabilise the once prosperous nation of Syria with meaningless promises of freedom, democracy, human rights. The fools in Hong Kong has similarly been conned into destroying their own homes for no other gain than the promise meaningless drivel of freedom garners. Everywhere your humanism has infected the minds of susceptible youths, death, destruction, and chaos ensues. Syria is the result of humanist meddling, which is the legach your religion.
So committed to the lunacy of dictating to Heaven your whims, that humanists have forgotten the concept of right and wrong, good and evil. The rightful and legitimate authority attempting to restore law and order is held in equivalence to rebellious malcontents burning their own society to ash. All the ills of the world stem from men not knowing their proper place within creation.
You continually expound on my views, when my view is that my views don't matter. What does matter is tech enabling people to prevent their wealth from being parasitized.
Address that matter, and we'll have something substantive to discuss, rather than vain puffery about philosophy.