Twitter Tampering: Up-Ranking Liberals by Shadow-Banning Conservatives Like They Do With Racists

in #politics6 years ago (edited)

Last week, Twitter was caught shadow-banning republican voices from being visible in it's search results. This up-ranked liberals at the expense of silencing prominent conservative voices.


Source1, Source2

VICE News investigated Twitter, and found that it was limiting visibility of prominent Republicans in order to "improve" the "quality" of it's platform. They want to make people talk about what they want them to talk about: liberal personalities and ideas.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it's the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar.

So, Twitter considered Republicans on par with racists. Interesting. It's no wonder the Right is recognized to support free-speech more than the Left. Social media's liberal leaning operational ownership has been employing efforts to silence what they consider objectionable content in order to control the things people can see, hear or think about.

Twitter said this was related to their new approach of combating "troll-like behaviors," as their changes mean "people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search".

Healthy conversations are liberal/Democrat, while conservative/Republicans are more unhealthy, like racists. Great job fairly representing the political landscape with your tampering in an election year Twitter.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country... That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

This makes Republicans and their posts less accessed, while Democrats get more views and hits due to automatically getting a higher rank in the listings.

Isn't this what the type of thing the Deep State and media had concocted about Russia tampering with the previous election to get Trump voted in? I guess Twitter is like CNN, CNBC, CBS and ABC, with favoritism towards the Left, and FOX is favors the Right. They all tamper with what their viewers get access to, and it's normalized, so why not Twitter too, right?

Twitter, has oddly left Alex Jones and InfoWars alone, when YouTube and Facebook have already taken measures to ban and censor their content, as I posted on a few days ago. They want the more alternative radical Right-leaning personalities to be left up to turn people off, while taking away the visibility of the more moderate mainstream conservative info.

After VICE News' story hit, and Breitbart picked it up, Twitter quickly changed the site's behavior. Twitter even denied the were shadow banning to Breibart, even though they were shadow-banning, call it an "error" instead. But this was a desired behavior that they only got busted on. It's easy to deny and claim it's all an "error". But earlier in the week, Gizmodo also confirmed the shadow-banning.

As an unintended side effect of demoting divisive figures, many of the dropdown results now show fake accounts.

People have previously mocked those who spoke of this shadow-banning, claiming they were "Conspiracy theorists". But now the proof is in the pudding, and they are seeing the reality that they previously denied.

Must admit that when some R sources have complained about this to me I mocked them to their face as conspiracy theorists. This Vice article makes me rethink that, and response from Twitter is inadequate. https://t.co/zjAnFV5dzT via @vicenews
— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan)


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


References:


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Sort:  

The censorship is out of control, and is having the reverse effect than I think they believe it is. It is endorsing the proof that they are scared of what is being uncovered. Proof that there are those who are feeding a false narrative as they create the necessity of alternative forms of media to be established.

I just wrote about Fakebook giving VOP a 3 day ban, and I suspect that it won't be long before the ban is permanent.

Yup, if it's thought to be "fake news" and unreal, then they don't want to let it speak. Talking child pedophile rape camps is unreal for many :/

They want the more alternative radical Right-leaning personalities to be left up to turn people off, while taking away the visibility of the more moderate mainstream conservative info.

That's the key. They want to make us sound like we are bigots whose content is full of hatred and racism while more radical leftist still have free access to comment on whatever the hell they want.

This is just the way it is, an information war. They want people with full consciousness to be silent while they are giving more relevance to what is more radical in our side. This is just the way they get into people's head. Same war of the XX century but with different structures. The left will never surrender, and we must and we will prevail stronger than ever because our principles and foundations relies on freedom and truth.

Yeah, the left get pass int he leftist media. It's sad how the term liberal was about freedom, and it's been altered from it's foundations in free speech and libertarian principles.

Here's a question I'm pondering: does freedom of the press mean the media is free to be a dumbass? Or do they cease to be "the press" at that point?
Or are we edging into a future where big corporations eclipse national governments, so we need to start expecting more of them? (Or declare independence from them?)

I think the Robocop and other dystopian futures of a corporatocracy is becoming more of a reality than fiction :/

It makes me laugh that people throw the derogatory label for critical thinkers around and when they get proven wrong they are like ....oh they were right, my bad. Dismissive up front is the worst kind of dissonance.

Yeah. Massive surveillance? No, not real. Oops, it was all along :P

Decentralized social media to the rescue? Any company will inevitably push its leaders political agendas if given the chance.

Yup, if you're in charge you want to push what you want in most people's cases ;)

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

What happened to free speech? Following.

On death row :/

Voted+followed. Do the same plzzz)

That won’t work everywhere. Engage in dialogue and present thoughts of your own and you can get votes and followers. Just saying vote and follow doesn’t attract anyone.

some even give downvotes when they ask it like that.
:)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 57791.14
ETH 2962.27
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.67