Confronting Sophistry - Ep. 3 : The 6 Most Common Logical Fallacies
Confronting Sophistry is a video series about critical thinking, self-education and deconstructing the techniques of those who seek to control our mental processes.
In this episode, host and producer Jeff DeRiso talks about the 6 most common logical fallacies, and how we can recognize and dismantle them. Logical fallacies are the foundation of sophistry and understanding them is the key to changing the thought paradigm of the world.
1. False Dichotomy
Person X and Person Y have a disagreement.
Person X is proven to be incorrect.
Therefore, Person Y must be correct.
2. Ad Hominem
Person A is proven incorrect about Conclusion X.
Therefore, every conclusion Person A makes is incorrect.
3. Ad Hominem (alternate version)
Person A reaches Conclusion X by irrational means.
Therefore, Conclusion X must be false.
4. Appeal to Authority
Person A is an authority on Subject X.
Therefore, any conclusion drawn by Person A regarding Subject X is correct.
5. Ad populum (appeal to majority)
A majority of people believe Conclusion X.
Therefore, Conclusion X must be true.
6. Straw man
Presenting the weakest form of an opponent's argument in order to appear to easily dispute it.
Other common logical fallacies not discussed in this video
Non sequitur: A logical fallacy in which an argument's conclusion does not follow from its premise.
Begging the question: An attempt to prove a proposition by using an argument that takes the proposition for granted.
I strive to continuously improve my understanding of logic and philosophy. If you have corrections or constructive criticisms to offer, I welcome them openly.
Great to see you posting again Jeff - it was truly a pleasure meeting fellow Steemians in person at the shop in Roswell. The shop owner signed up finally too after realizing what a phenomenon we're all on the ground floor / bleeding edge of.
Best, Guy
Thanks Guy, glad you encouraged me to keep at it. I enjoyed my stay in Roswell, and found the UFO museum's heavy-handed bias toward the ET hypothesis to be rather humorous.
It can be hard to know who to trust when trying to distribute content out to an audience, I'm starting to really like this decentralized approach. All the great content I consume on here only makes my content that much better!
Haha I know what you mean! But don't forget the site is mainstreaming and being dumbed down more every day - after all they let me in. Soon it'll be so easy to post here a caveman can do it.
Congratulations @jeffderiso! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about this award, click here