Well the agenda is clearly about control and power. If it were actually for a solution they wouldn't be pushing so hard for a Carbon Tax. A Carbon Tax is a global tax which means it is controlled by a global body (aka global government) so it is a first step in creating a global government.

Then there is the massive wealth that can be made from these taxes on breathing (since you exhale CO2) and the hysteria related to it. The fact of the matter is the Carbon Tax fixes nothing. It allows the worst offenders to continue offending, which is why people like Al Gore who talk about it have a massive carbon footprint and can afford it. So when they are pushing for a carbon tax that will impact the average person and not impact those in power. It will only grant them more power.

It also does nothing to address Anthropogenic Global Warming.

So the fact that tends to be the solution they push the most within this entire "climate change" movement is also pretty telling.

There are some indicators the warming has been reversing and going the other way for a little over half a decade. This would correlate to the change in the sun, and how active it has been, which makes a lot of sense scientifically speaking.

So if it is cooling, and we end up spraying crap into the atmosphere and doing other things to fight "global warming" would that not potentially speed up the cooling?

So my big AHA moment today was thinking... Who benefits if there is an ice age?

Anyone that can purchase the land that is just below sea level right now would suddenly have prime ocean front property. Which is the opposite of what they are publicly putting emphasis on. They have been focusing on rising sea levels.

Historically and in the future the sea levels are going to rise and fall. If we are going to stop this then that means we are FOR Anthropogenic Climate Change. We are trying to learn to freeze the climate in place so that we can protect our prime real estate. In reality, building close to the ocean is always a risk, and always has been a risk. Like I indicated there are plenty of ruins below the surface of bodies of water that are a testament to this fact.

I had never considered Global Cooling giving NEW LAND for those in the KNOW though until today. That is why I posted this.

Also consensus is not scientific. Consensus is meaningless to science. If 99% of people believe something that is false, that does not make it suddenly factual or true. I posted a satirical article about that topic recently.