You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why I Stopped Being a Conspiracy Theorist
Yeah I was under the impression some actual conversation could happen when you don't care because the negatives will win, too bad feelings.
Questions, observations and explanations make me right, the pursuit of truth drives me to questions, observations and explanations, feelings is what your whole "discussion" is centers around, only feelings, and faith.
Don't forget to accuse me of assuming, or maybe command me to feel.
I don't command you to do anything, I said you are free to do as you wish just as you are right now, I'm enjoying you continually proving the point that you are not open to receiving any other perspective but your own. Thus you are not willing to consider that you are the cause of your own feelings of whatever it is that you feel about whatever it is that you feel it about. I'm just going to keep going until you figure that out though, and I don't have anything else to do anymore, I'm not going dig for info to expose anyone, I'll just let them expose themselves, it's much easier.
And why and how is that I am not open to receiving any other perspective (one word answer ego, duh!), the questions mount:
Exactly what have I assumed about your reasons?
What's that analogy of playing in the mud for? For speaking the truth, that's mud?
What's the greatest illusion? what did you bring my ego up for? How can I see that which is making me effectively not see?
What is it about feelings that makes every attempt at a discussions about truth derail as such? Why and how am I not willing to consider that I am the cause of my own feelings? Why, are you not an island unto yourself?
OOO one I haven't already given you the answer to, will you see this one?
You still want some sort of validation from me and don't understand that I have no validation to give you. You need to validate yourself.
O excuse me for raising questions concerning things you've brought up in a conversation, that you didn't give a fuck about, but do act like you've answered one question though, my cuteness and comedy is enough care factor, no?
You don't seem to do well with answers, I'll change it up and ask you some questions:
Do you think there is anything you can say to change my perspective?
Do you think I can change your perspective by answering questions that you already know the answers to?
Do you think your knowing is any more knowledgeable than my knowing?
Do you know you are arguing with someone that is reflecting back exactly what you are putting out?
The duality of existence is the best troll ever. Good/evil, right/wrong, and the illusion that one ever goes away and is replaced by the other. The only choice or control you have is your own mind and what you choose to do with it.
I don't seem? You haven't answered one question, and no, one word answers and blanket statements don't count, yes, I don't do well with answers, keep the fiction going that you actually addressed questions.
All these questions are a fallacy themselves, loaded question/complex question:
Why is the topic all of a sudden over what I think about convincing you? what's the relevance to the previous points which amounted to nothing more than questions asking for clarification/explanation, which remain unanswered while some are simply unwarranted?
What you think "exactly what you are putting out" means, I'm sure you're proud of that namaste skill you've acquired, in lieu of answering questions that challenge your faith.
Is that mind reading or you simply know what I know, namaste skill #38, peering thought.
I decided to answer your questions with a whole post just to share our new friendship. Thanks for all of the inspiration today!
https://steemit.com/spiritual/@clayboyn/why-aren-t-we-answering-each-other