You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is It Time For Steem To Start Embracing Investors?
I would agree, there is a high regard for the idea of "quality" content on here when, looking at the Internet, most of it is not quality. Yet people balk at the fact that Steem is not taking off. Perhaps if we focused upon what the masses care about and not what a few early adopters, we would be much better off.
As for the investing, I bought a number of batches of STEEM over the past two years and powered them up. That is really the way to grow ones account. Having more SP makes one stand out more...it is really that simple.
We are looking at a move to a 50/50 split on the curation so that might be incentive for people to curate more. We shall see.
I think we first need to have a solid base. Try to help STEEM become what it promised to be.
Most is not quality, but quality is the most rewarded most of the time in one way or another. That is not the case on STEEM at all. I think that is the problem. While internet has a lot of low quality content, high quality content is rewarded, on STEEM there is as much low quality content but almost all of the top rewarded content is of low quality.
That i think creates an impression on the investor that STEEM is fake. They look at the most rewarded things and instantly think that there is something wrong here.