Seth Rich Dies & the FBI Lies

Meme by me @richq11 via imgflip.com... Google Images

What would cause the highest law enforcement agency to continuously lie and cover up for career criminals in government... the stakes must be high indeed for them to refuse to investigate the murder of a young man whose only wish was to see integrity restored to government. As someone from Arkansas could rightly point out: "If you ain't fer integrity, then yer agin it." In their own defense the FBI director claims that they've "done nothing wrong, which begs the question, why is it all right for members of the FBI to lie when it persecutes (not a typo) people like Gen. Flynn, Roger Stone, et.al.. Either the system has to be consistent and fair to all- or none.

 In response, the DOJ immediately stepped in with a letter to the judge.  In this letter the DOJ claimed the FBI had met its burden and its search would have located emails “of investigative significance”: 

To call the FBI investigation a good faith effort is laughable. Donna Brazile, along with Washington's mayor were both mysteriously at the hospital at the same time as Seth Rich but neither was questioned- why not? Apparently in FBI parlance a "reasonable search" constitutes no search at all. Anyone that has even remotely been paying attention these past several years knows that Seth Rich's murder was not a "robbery gone bad" as the official narrative claims. His watch, wallet, cash and personal items were all on his person when he arrived at the hospital. (I Googled to find the name of the hospital and found page after page "debunking the Seth Rich murder conspiracy- blaming the story on the Russians!) He arrived at the hospital alert and aware according to reports and I'm fairly certain he didn't commit suicide... he was in fact murdered.

The question is, qui bono, who benefitted from Rich's murder. If the FBI was conducting a legitimate inquiry they would be asking this question among many others. So before getting into the FBI's latest round of lies, let's take a look at what we already know. The DNC's computer was allegedly "hacked" by agents for the Russian government, but instead of allowing the FBI's computer forensic team access they- through law firm Perkins Coie- hired Crowdstrike to examine the server (which has gone missing and is more difficult to find than Waldo). It was Crowdstrike that determined that Russia is to blame for the "hack." However, experts- Bill Binney in particular- has determined by examining the metadata that it's impossible that foreign entities could have downloaded that much data in such a short amount of time. Biney's expertise as well as his patriotism is unquestionable:

 Bill Binney, is more than an expert, he is “A Good American”. Binney developed a system for the NSA that would have identified the 9-11 terrorist attack before it occurred, but the NSA shut down his project. This is all documented in Oliver Stone’s “A Good American”. 

As far as Clinton campaign chair John Podesta and "leakers" go, he said in one of his emails:

This indicates that the DNC and Clinton campaign (as if there was a difference) knew that the information had been leaked and not hacked. So what happened? Debbie Wasserman Schultz, then chair of the DNC, put a "187" (kill order) out on Rich through MS-13 gang members in nearby Maryland at the order of John Podesta and HRC. No kill orders from the Clinton Crime family go out without the auspices of HTC. When the attempt failed Donna Brazile was likely sent in to make sure the job was done right. Why is this important now? Because the cover-up continues to this day with the FBI running cover for the Deep State and Clinton Crime Cabal.

The FBI claims not to have been investigating Rich's murder, but if so how did they come to have his computer- what were they in fact investigating?

For not conducting any investigation the FBI had a lot of activity... but then it's difficult to do a cover-up without knowing exactly what you're covering up. " The DOJ then says that the FBI never said it had searched everyone’s emails and claims it didn’t identify the emails it later released because they were not “substantive” emails." Exactly who does everybody include and what specifically was the FBI looking for?

This stinks! "The FBI has [NOT] been forthright." They have generated a ton of emails over what they're describing as a non-investigation. Why? According to the lawsuit ny Texas businessman Ed Butowsky his attorney Ty Clevinger requested and received documents from the FBI: "they obtained the transcript from former FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki where he states that the Obama White House was the entity that was pushing the Russia conspiracy as early as October 2016." Whether or not the Obama White House was read in on the Rich hit is unclear and is unlikely to be revealed.

"Rybicki was corrupt cop James Comey’s Chief of staff," the same James Comey that cited "lack of intent" as the reason not to indict or prosecute Clinton for a multiple of offenses including keeping classified documents on an unsecure server among a myriad of other prosecutable offences. It was at the behest of then Atty General Loretta Lynch that Clinton escaped prosecution. How far up the chain of command the Rich murder goes is a subject for conjecture- typically the president is kept out of the loop in these matters for "plausible deniability." However, blame for the Russian collusion hoax goes all the way to the top.

 Newly released documents from the FBI suggest that the Obama White House pushed intelligence agencies to publicly blame the Russians for email leaks from the Democratic National Committee to Wikileaks.This afternoon I received an undated (and heavily redacted) transcript of an interview of James Rybicki, former chief of staff to former FBI Director James Comey, that includes this excerpt: “So we understand that at some point in October of 2016, there was, I guess, a desire by the White House to make some kind of statement about Russia’s…” and then the next page is omitted. 

Plausible deniability. One key theme in the impeachment hearings being overlooked is the relationship between Crowdstrike, the DNC, and Ukraine. Instead of Russia, Russia, Russia, it should be Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine- it's been said that it is the Ukraine that is in fact in possession of the DNC server.

 In the final day of questioning in the US Senate impeachment hearings, there is one subject that is overlooked – Crowdstrike.  This firm supposedly confirmed in June 2016 that the DNC’s emails were hacked, and they were hacked by Russia.

The transcript of the infamous July 25th phone call mentions Crowdstrike, not the Bidens, but the Democrats are anxious to divert attention away from this. Why? Because the answer may lead back to the murder of Seth Rich. Here's the transcript [partial]:

Nothing in politics, or anywhere else for that matter, happens in isolation. This includes the murder of Seth Rich, Crowdstrike hiding the DNC server, Hillary's emails, Podesta's threats or anything else associated with this- including Donna Brazile showing up at the hospital.

 The corrupt FBI and Mueller team claimed that DNC emails released by WikiLeaks before the 2016 election were hacked by Russia, but neither entity inspected the DNC server which was supposedly hacked. They provided no proof of this. The DNC instead hired a firm Crowdstrike, with <a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/major-find-more-ammunition-for-roger-stone-the-only-firm-to-review-dnc-server-crowdstrike-is-connected-to-james-clapper-the-atlantic-council-and-more-shoddy-it-investigative-work/"connections to Mueller and former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who provided a redacted report to the FBI and Mueller stating the emails were hacked by Russia. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney claims he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar. 

By now the FBI and other intel agencies know that Bill Binney's evidence is incontrovertible... moreover it's critically important. So why is it being ignored? I think by now the answer is abundantly clear- nobody is looking for the truth. In fact the truth would destroy the narrative the Democrats and deep state have been pushing. The DNC server "disappeared" to protect the guilty and the real tragedy in all of this is that Seth Rich's murder will go unsolved so that a bunch of greedy politicians can escape prosecution and continue to fill their pockets with taxpayer funds. For decades places like Ukraine, North Korea, Iran, Iraq and others have acted as a slush fund for the deep state. For decades our own elected leaders have sold our military secrets to dictatorships and brutal regimes like China. A young man named Seth Rich had the courage to stand up and expose some of the filth- and they murdered him for his honesty... and now the FBI, America's top law enforcement agency is lying to cover up the corruption.

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/breaking-exclusive-fbi-covered-up-strzok-and-page-emails-regarding-seth-rich-now-the-fbi-is-doubling-down-in-their-cover-up/?

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/hey-senators-will-someone-ask-the-crowdstrike-question-at-the-impeachment-hearing-please/?