Steemit is different! - Rules for copyrights /// rules for sailing in the sea - watercolor
.jpg)
rules for sailing in the sea
2 0 1 9
watercolor on paper
Steemit is different! - Rules for copyrights.
I have written two articles that dealt with the original contents, in art, linked to the retrieval of photographic sources, the transparency of the sources and the use we make of them on Steemit.
Find them here.
our social network is different and is based on Steem's blockchain.
It is a social media with high contents, with topics, articles and research that are the result of studies, innovation, analysis and above all originality, verified by other users and subject to criticism and appreciation.
We are not Facebook or Instagram where original content is often modified, shared under other IDs and then plagiarized.
On Fb and Instagram there are no rules for publication, we take a photograph, a painting, a text, a quote, and publish it freely.
On these social networks it is a real pitfall, because many do not cite sources making plagiarism and abuse of content, but they pass it smoothly, because checks do not take place, except in some cases.
On Steemit it is mandatory.
Steemit is different!
The contents must be of high quality and above all original.
Plagiarism and abuse are not allowed.
To get good quality content and to deserve upvote, we must first mention the source where the text was taken, the written quote from an author, poet or writer, the image of a work of art or photography.
Even for paintings by not famous artists, we must always mention the source.
If we take photographs, texts or music from other writers, poets, artists, musicians, we must ask them for permission to publish, always!
Otherwise it is overt plagiarism.
Steemit is different.
The contents we publish, receive prizes in cryptocurrency, the Steem, and due to the fact that our posts are paid by our votes, we must pay close attention to the transparency and the quotation of ALL THE SOURCES !.
We also pay close attention to the sources we have on other media, for example CDs - CDroms - Records - Books - Paper publishing publications, encyclopedias and more.
In most cases all these publications have the automatic copyright, take a look here:
https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/technology-law/technology-and-intellectual-property/copyright-internet.htm
last news:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.130.01.0092.01.ENG
https://www.ilpost.it/2019/01/02/opere-che-perderanno-copyright-2019/ [ITA]
Many friends, but also unknown users and artists have commented on my articles, both under the post and on discord, in private.
Most of them agreed with my comments, a minority commented asking me how can I make original content with images taken from other sources, or with images of famous works of art, therefore already existing?
I try to reply again:
We know well that art, literature, poetry and music are not invented, it is necessary to have other sources of inspiration and study.
If we use photos, texts and images of other artists, alive or dead, it is allowed only if we go to get everything free from copyrights.
I can take an image of Leonardo Da Vinci's Gioconda, I can work on it, change it, twist it, but the original photo of the Mona Lisa I worked on must be free from copyrights.
We can also quote a famous text, for example from Shakespeare, but we must take the quotation where we have a right, above all we must mention the original text, the source !.
This is mandatory otherwise it is plagiarism and abuse.
Someone says; Shakespeare or Leonardo have been dead for centuries and there is no copyright!
Yes, they died, but their cultural legacy published on the Internet has certainly been shared on some copyrights-free sites, find it!
But there are also other websites that own the copyright of the published work , such as the domain of the site, the work done for publication, research, study and many other parameters.
All these parameters are protected by copyright, so I have to ask permission to those who have already published photos or texts of famous artists, in order to publish in turn.
By avoiding copying and pasting or changing anything in the text.
It all comes to the surface, because there are sites that can verify if there are abuses and plagiarisms in any content,
clear?
On Steemit we can write and publish anything, but always in the few elementary rules of the our social.
Today I shared my artistic post, a watercolor, which can be an example for many artists who have no ideas or, just like myself, need sources to set up an artistic or scientific work.
I needed to see a traditional sailing ship:
- I searched for images on the internet and found this image free of copyrights.
- I took the shape and the line of the subject, sailboat and I inserted it in a new context, colored and with a lot of imagination and imagination.
- This is an artistic work of correct photographic research.
- I quote the source and above all I took a free copyrights image.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Many artists on Steemit publish content taken from other photographic models, to then obtain different results.
You can do, following and respecting the Steemit rules , copyright free images, mention the source where the image was taken.
Steemit is different
My usual advice: we create a our photo archive, we take thousands of photos with our mobile phones, we don't pay for the photos, as happened 20 years ago.
All you need is a memory, usb, hard disk and other solutions to store our photographs.
Can we make a collage with images of more or less famous works of art, created by other artists, alive or dead?
Certainly, it is enough to take images free of copyright, edit them, modify them and create a new artistic work.
Nothing is invented, everything is transformed, even art, but following the rules.
I will dedicate the next article to curation on Steemit, which is sometimes lacking precisely because, bona fide curators do not have all the tools to verify plagiarism or abuse.
That's why Steemit is different.
A hug free from copyrights.
Armando
two examples of plagiarism
https://steemit.com/antiabuse/@jaguar.force/art-plagiarism-case-27-caso-de-plagio-artistico-27-vitalina-aka-vika-artamonova-aka-viktoria-artamonova-viktoriya-artamonova
Steemit is different! - Regole per copyrights.
Ho scritto due articoli che riguardavano i contenuti originali, nell'arte, collegati al reperimento delle fonti fotografiche, della trasparenza delle fonti e sull'uso che ne facciamo noi artisti su Steemit.
Li trovate qui.
[1]
Il nostro social è differente, ed è basato sulla blockchain di Steem.
E' un social di alti contenuti, con argomenti, articoli e ricerche che sono frutto di studi, innovazione, analisi e soprattutto di originalità, verificati da altri utenti e soggetti a critiche e apprezzamenti.
Non siamo Facebook o Instagram dove i contenuti originali spesso vengono modificati, condivisi sotto altri ID e quindi plagiati.
Su Fb e Instagram non esistono regole per la pubblicazione, si prende una fotografia, un quadro, un testo, una citazione, e si pubblica liberamente.
Su questi social e’ una vera e propria bolgia, perchè molti non citano le fonti compiendo plagi e abusi di contenuti, ma la passano liscia, perchè i controlli non avvengono, fatta eccezione per alcuni casi.
Su Steemit è obbligatorio.
Steemit è differente!
I contenuti devono essere di alta qualità e soprattutto originali.
Non si ammette il plagio e l’abuso.
Per avere contenuti di buon livello e meritare upvote, bisogna anzitutto citare la fonte dove si è preso il testo, la citazione scritta di un autore, poeta o letterato, l'immagine di un opera d'arte o la fotografia.
Anche per i quadri di artisti non famosi, dobbiamo sempre citare la fonte.
Se prendiamo fotografie, testi o musiche di altri scrittori, poeti, artisti, musicisti, dobbiamo chiedere a loro l'autorizzazione per pubblicare, sempre!
Altrimenti è plagio conclamato.
Steemit è differente.
I contenuti che pubblichiamo, ricevono premi in cryptovaluta, lo Steem, e per il fatto che i nostri post vengono pagati dai nostri voti, dobbiamo fare molta attenzione alla trasparenza e alla citazione di TUTTE LE FONTI!.
Facciamo molta attenzione anche alle fonti che abbiamo su altri supporti, per esempio CD - CDrom - Dischi - Libri - Pubblicazioni editoriali cartacee , enciclopedie e altro ancora.
Nella maggior parte dei casi tutte queste pubblicazioni hanno il copyright automatico, date un occhiata qui:
https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/technology-law/technology-and-intellectual-property/copyright-internet.htm
ultime novità:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.130.01.0092.01.ENG
https://www.ilpost.it/2019/01/02/opere-che-perderanno-copyright-2019/ [ITA]
Molti amici, ma anche utenti sconosciuti e artisti hanno commentato i miei articoli, sia sotto il post che su discord, in privato.
La maggioranza di loro si è trovata d'accordo con le mie osservazioni, una minoranza ha commentato chiedendomi come poter fare contenuti originali con immagini prese da altre fonti, o con immagini di opere d'arte famose, quindi già esistenti?
Provo a rispondere nuovamente:
Sappiamo bene che l'arte, la letteratura, la poesia e la musica non si inventano, è necessario avere altre fonti di ispirazione e di studio.
Se usiamo foto, testi e immagini di altri artisti, in vita o morti, è consentito solo se andiamo a prendere tutto libero da copyrights.
Posso prendere un'immagine della Gioconda di Leonardo Da Vinci, la posso lavorare, cambiare, stravolgere, ma la fotografia originale della Gioconda sulla quale ho lavorato, deve essere libera da copyrights.
Possiamo anche citare un testo famoso, ad esempio di Shakespeare, ma dobbiamo prendere la citazione dove ne abbiamo diritto, soprattutto ne dobbiamo citare il testo originale, la fonte!.
Questo è obbligatorio altrimenti è plagio e abuso.
Qualcuno dice; Shakespeare o Leonardo sono deceduti da secoli e non c’è il copyright!
Si, sono morti, ma il loro lascito culturale pubblicato su Internet è sicuramente stato condiviso in qualche sito libero da copyrights, trovatelo!
Ma ci sono anche altri siti web che detengono il copyright del lavoro pubblicato, come ad esempio il dominio del sito, il lavoro fatto per la pubblicazione, la ricerca, lo studio e tanti altri parametri.
Tutti questi parametri sono tutelati da copyright, quindi devo chiedere autorizzazione a chi ha già pubblicato foto o testi di artisti famosi, per poter pubblicare a mia volta.
Evitando di fare copia e incolla o cambiare qualcosa nel testo.
Viene tutto a galla, perchè ci sono dei siti che riescono a verificare se sono presenti abusi e plagi in qualsiasi contenuto, chiaro?
Su Steemit possiamo scrivere e pubblicare qualsiasi cosa, ma sempre nelle poche regole elementari del nostro social.
Oggi ho condiviso un mio post artistico, un acquarello, che può essere da esempio per molti artisti che non hanno idee oppure, proprio come il sottoscritto, hanno bisogno di fonti per impostare un lavoro artistico o scientifico.
Avevo bisogno di vedere un veliero di tipo tradizionale:
- Ho cercato le immagini su internet ed ho trovato questa immagine libera da copyrights.
- Ho preso la forma e la linea del soggetto, barca a vela e la ho inserita in un contesto nuovo, colorato e con molta immaginazione e fantasia.
- Questo è un lavoro artistico di ricerca fotografica corretta.
- cito la fonte e soprattutto ho preso una immagine libera da copyrights.
Molti artisti su Steemit pubblicano contenuti presi da altri modelli fotografici, per poi ottenere dei risultati diversi.
Si può fare, seguendo e rispettando le regole di Steemit, immagini libere da copyright, citare la fonte dove si è presa l'immagine.
Steemit è differente
Il mio solito consiglio: creiamo un nostro archivio fotografico, scattiamo migliaia di foto con i nostri cellulari, non le paghiamo le foto, come succedeva 20 anni fa.
Basta solo avere una memoria, usb, hard disk ed altre soluzioni su cui conservare le nostre fotografie.
Possiamo fare un collage con immagini di opere d'arte più o meno famose, create da altri artisti, in vita o morti?
Certamente, basta prendere immagini libere da diritti di autore, montarle, modificarle e creare un nuovo lavoro artistico.
Nulla si inventa, tutto si trasforma, anche l'arte, ma seguendo le regole.
Il prossimo articolo lo dedicherò alla curation su Steemit, che qualche volta è deficitaria proprio perchè, i curatori in buona fede, non hanno tutti gli strumenti per verificare plagi o abusi.
Ecco perchè Steemit è differente.
Un abbraccio libero da copyrights.
Armando
two examples of plagiarism
https://steemit.com/antiabuse/@jaguar.force/art-plagiarism-case-27-caso-de-plagio-artistico-27-vitalina-aka-vika-artamonova-aka-viktoria-artamonova-viktoriya-artamonova
https://steemit.com/antiabuse/@jaguar.force/art-plagiarism-case-24-caso-de-plagio-artistico-24-disfruarte
- Art teacher
- Curator of cultural activities
- Artistic director and President of the Cultural Association "I Colori della Vita"
https://www.icoloridellavita.life/
Thank you for contributing to the @utopian-io anti-abuse initiative, @armandosodano.
Your insights as an artist are invaluable. The level of art plagiarism and plagiarism in general on the Steem blockchain is at times unbelievable. Part of the reason is because the topic of plagiarism when it comes to the sources of art or other creative outputs has been overshadowed by the prevalence of plagiarism of everyday text. Regardless, plagiarism within the art community and the lack of giving credit to the sources of artistic inspiration is something that must be addressed.
Your contribution showcases your passion and desire, as a professional artist, to set others on the right path. Giving credit to their sources is one relatively-minor thing anyone can do. In fact, it is something no one should ever be hesitant in doing. We can only hope that others will follow your example and willingly choose to cite sources and give credit without being asked to do so.
In terms of your post, it was very interesting to read but the lack of formatting using the full range of markdown took away from it. Also, going forward, as @enforcer48 pointed out in the comments below, please be cognizant of the differences between Steem (the blockchain) and Steemit (one of the websites that the blockchain is accessible from). To confuse them is to confuse the readers.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
thank you for your in-depth comment and your analysis, I have corrected the point you suggested to me. Thank you @guiltyparties
Thank you for your review, @guiltyparties! Keep up the good work!
Excellent work Armando, your posts are having a great effect on the platform, check for example this https://steemit.com/spanish/@sosadraws/catchild
One might feel one is talking to the wall sometimes, but people are listening, and very attently.
Big hug for you!
thank you and good job!
yes I saw an excellent job as an example for others.
Very lovely art work, as usual, @armandosodano, I love how you show the original picture that inspired you, and seeing the final painting, I can SEE clearly the artistry and creativity that you have infused the artwork with :) The sea, the form of the sail boat, the sky, these have all become your own original creativity ! This is an obvious show of how an artist can be open and honest with our influences, and yet this also shows how our own ingenuity and ideas carry our own interpretations and talents on the canvas!
Your passion for art shows that you care very much about integrity of art <3 It impresses me greatly :)
It is your kind of beautiful spirits and perspectives that has enriched Steemit's art sphere and one that I will seek to continue to support <3 <3 <3
Absolutely wonderful post, Armando! Both a display of talents and a very informative and teaching type of publication !!! I love it <3 !!!!
I am very honored for your beautiful comment, thank you very much
Well, there are some users who are being attacked, no matter if they include the source or not. Like this girl here:
https://busy.org/@andrianna/who-saw-plagiarism-here-why-are-i-again-illegally-accused-and-slandered
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@jaguar.force/the-biggest-fairy-tale-of-all-the-curious-case-of-andrianna-and-the-yanik-plagiarism-ring-art-plagiarism-case-28-alena-bessonova-alena-bessonova-1558549023216
Do you understand that @jaguar.force and all these self-appointed Police Officers of SteemIt are nothing more than regular users, just like you and me... the only difference is they happen to be rich.
So, if I win the lottery and buy enough Steem, I can claim Steem is a network where only porn can be shared... and everyone else must follow my rules of leave because I will flag them to zero if they post anything other than porn.
Do you think this is a fair model of a social network or business? I don't.
This idea seemed great ... but I'm getting so disappointed that I don't really care about these self-appointed rulers anymore. I'll do whatever I want and let them do whatever they want, too. This is a total chaos where money is the only real rule. If you have enough money, you can dictate the rules yourself.
I thought the Blockchain would be a better model but it has proven to be the exact opposite. I have bought plenty of Steem but now I'm just thinking about recovering my investment and I won't throw another penny at this network.
I'd rather hold BTC than a shitcoin that only goes down because the community is full of rich bullies and the majority of the whales are too scared of them to stand up.
I don't know if they have the money, but I'm interested in cleaning the contents, as there are many artists who do a hard job posting original content.
I too have invested and remain in doing my duty as a teacher and educator to the right rules.
A hug
Sei un punto di riferimento per gli Steemians, caro Armando, sia per gli eccellenti dipinti e scritti artistici, sia per le preziose indicazioni che hai fornito come in questo post informativo, ottimo lavoro davvero
Posted using Partiko Android
grazie caro Marco vorrei essere meno di riferimento e più di curation per gli altri, un altro problema è proprio dato dai contenuti fallaci votati in curation, il prossimo post sarà centrato su questo spinoso argomento. Un abbraccio gigante.
Hello!
This post has been manually curated, resteemed
and gifted with some virtually delicious cake
from the @helpiecake curation team!
Much love to you from all of us at @helpie!
Keep up the great work!
Manually curated by @veryspider.
Some people find it difficult to grasp the concept of intellectual property. It doesn't matter that someone passed away. It's still his/her work and you can't just publish it without mentioning the author. But I think that most of those people questioning such copyright have never created anything themselves :) BUT your post is very good and you explained it very well. Thank you for that!!
Of course a post with images/citation/etc that are not yours can be original. As long as you don't plagiarize content, source your information and only use it to support your work/thoughts there is no problem whatsoever. It's sad that many people don't understand that and there is always some discussion about it..
Thank you for those rules to sail in the sea :) PS: Your painting is beautiful (but you know this already :))
thanks you are adorable a big hug. Ciao
Minor correction:
Please use the term
Steemwhen referring to the blockchain.Steemitis likenTopaz. Another frontend/platform on the blockchain.Steemis the blockchain.Steemitis a frontend (aka the dapp).Ciao @armandosodano, questo acquerello mi piace moltissimo! È il mio preferito, complimenti. I colori sono bellissimi!
grazie veramente @bafi un abbraccio.
This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.
@c-squared runs a community witness. Please consider using one of your witness votes on us here