You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: God Is Dead

in #nonsense7 years ago

I definitely agree that while aiming for perfection is a good aim, it can hold one's self down for ever reaching because the result could be "imperfect". Failure could be thought only as a natural progression, they're bound to happen. I like to take myself not too seriously so "failures" don't bother me that much. Just happy little accidents :D

I try to just do things anyway even thought they are not perfect which is very very hard to do consistently unless it becomes a habit to thrive in to uncomfort.

Do keep going! Sometimes great things require some discomfort.

Sort:  

Yeah this is paradox! You have to thrive to perfection but at the same time you don’t progress without being unperfect and try and fail. At the same time you should be taking stuff seriously and investing ones time but at the same time not be attached to the outcome. I have found many paradoxes where in many cases you must be both!

It's a world of contradictions indeed. Btw, Steemit payouts work so that payments under $0.02 are considered as "dust" and won't be payed, so you might want to take that into account when upvoting especially with comments that aren't above that threshold :)

Didn’t know that! Thanks for the info! Do you know how the reward is ditributed between curstors? I understand that the 50% of the payout is distributed between curators and it is paid with steem power? Correct me if I am wrong.

It is actually 25% that goes to curators, used to be 50% some time ago though, but it is given as Steem Power, that's correct.

Here's a quotation from a post:

  • 1 to 3 minutes - you get 100 % of the curator's share as author
  • 3 to 15 minutes - you get 90 % of the curator's share as author
  • 15-27 minutes - you get 50% of the curator's share as author
  • 27-30 minutes - you get 10% of the curator's share as author
  • After 30 minutes the 25% go completely to the curators and you as author don't get a share of it anymore.

So if voted in the first 30 minutes, some of the curator's share goes back to the author depending how soon the post is being voted.

Ok thanks for correction! Do you know how is the reward distributed between the curators? I understand that it depends on how much does the curator vote weight, but do you know The math?

Found this formula from a post.

For simplicity, let's say all the votes come after 30 minutes so now the whole 25% curation share from the post payout is distributed somewhat like in the graph. The first voter would get the biggest curation reward, the second voter the second biggest and so on...

So, the sooner the better, except during the 30 minute period which eliminates autovoters from stealing curation rewards.

Okay this clears many things! ;D Thanks for the information! Really helpful! KIITOS :D

Eipä mitään!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 79169.45
ETH 3182.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.63