Think Big or Don't Think At All: World Domination Stems From Lessons In History

11/15/2018
I wrote something. Something that somehow flew under the radar.
Twelve people showed up to leave a comment that day. Three basically said, "Nice post." One said, "Remind me to read this later." I forgot to remind him.
What I wrote about on November 15, 2018; well, it all may have sounded too far-fetched at the time. Over-the-top so over the heads.
Plenty of changes here on our fancy STEEM blockchain these days. Some say it's a good day to be alive.
I tend to agree. Things are lookin' up!
So read my article from five days shy of eight months ago:
(With edits to formatting and some wording.)

You Mean To Say I Can Get Paid To Be An Artist Without Having To Charge Anyone A Fee? That's Brilliant!

I Thought:
The multibillions generated yearly by the arts and entertainment industry would slowly find it's way here, to this blockchain.
Signing up was a no-brainer for me, instantaneous, and all I could see was a bright future ahead.
Many either don't know or seem to forget what it was like in the late 90's and early 2000's for artists and consumers, as everything transitioned from hard copy to the internet, when we were first entering this digital age.
There was a new file format known as 'MP3'
for instance.
That was and still is a music file. Most of us could easily find music, online, for free, back then; much like today.
The only difference was, those were pirated copies of songs and albums.
Eventually, pirated copies of movies started to circulate as well. The big corporate media conglomerates hated that. They had noticed a decline in profits, realized their product was being shared freely all over the internet; so they stepped in to attempt to put a stop to it all.
I remember bands like Metallica, back in the day, making worldwide headlines because they openly came out and said people were stealing their music; people stealing their stuff didn't sit well with them.
I'm sure you'd be pissed off as well if you bought twelve houses for your supercars and suddenly couldn't pay for any of it.
A file sharing platform called Napster also made worldwide headlines at about the same time.
Millions of people used Napster and the big corporate media lawyers were planning to shut it down. This made many content consumers angry because they had been taking free entertainment for granted for quite a few years and now suddenly, they might have to pay again.
Grr!
It became a battle against artists and the people who enjoy art.
Artists didn't think it was fair to work for free, because it's not; patrons of the arts didn't think the artists should make money, which is silly.
I didn't pick sides back then even though I was one of these disgruntled media leaches who thought people should supply my entitlement issues with entertainment, on demand.
One of the downsides to what happened back then:
Sour grapes. Some content consumers still despise the fact artists make money to the point where they don't like artists, even though it's the big corporate media conglomerates and their lawyers who should be getting the evil eye, and not the independent artists, like me. Big media and the general public's reaction combined made all artists look like greedy selfish shit-bags.
.png)
Eventually
Artists embraced this new technology and found other ways to make up for the lost revenue.
I can turn on Youtube right now and listen to a steady stream of music, even though it's interrupted by advertisements after nearly every song, while Google watches my every move so it can provide better advertisements in the future.
Single tracks are available to purchase from platforms eerily similar to the ones that got taken down, back in the day.
If you would have told me, back in the day, I'd be able to consume online content and get paid every time I like something, I would have called you a liar.
If you would have told me, back in the day, I could produce some content and get paid simply because people liked what I shared, instead of charging them a fee, I would have called you the biggest bullshitter in the history of lies.
Yet here we are.
The dawn of a new age.
Or so I thought.
Back when I started here, we had more curators, more investors eager to help make this platform thrive, less people being paid to look away, and nobody could steal the spotlight from someone with actual talent by posting a Facebook style status message about the value of a certain token going up or down, then paying middlemen (bots) hundreds of dollars, just so the Facebook wannabe can earn two dollars for presenting information that was outdated five minutes before posting; effectively pushing the actual talent away to other platforms, along with those valuable eyes and ears who prefer talent over junk (where the billions of dollars come from).
So, unfortunately, I guess these investors here and now can kiss those potential billions goodbye and replace it with the few thousand they'll earn selling votes, until everything falls in on itself and they have nothing to show for it.
Yes, I just said all that. Deal with it.
Genius!
But I'll be honest. I still see potential here on this blockchain and I still think it can revolutionize the arts and entertainment industry.
Back in the day, the independent artists were the first to actually embrace the internet and this concept of sharing as a way to earn potential revenue. They'd develop a band webpage, for instance, and release a single track in MP3 format while offering the full album as something for sale in their online store; a store empowered by inventions like Paypal.
Big media embraced the digital arts years later, once they saw what others were doing and had enough ideas to borrow (they don't like stealing).
Looking around this platform.
All I see are the trailblazing content producers; independent artists and writers making waves.
Big media will attempt to crush this movement first, then move in later. We will not see large media corporations investing in this platform. They'll borrow the idea though, once the coast is clear and they have a firm stranglehold on most of the potential profits.
What the big media types won't like about this place is the fact all but the cut content consumers take away in the form of curation reward goes directly to the 100% independent artist. There's no middleman and that has always been the corporate game; their way of creating the starving artist, while they earn billions.
(I wrote this eight months ago. Heard any news about Facebook lately?)
Nobody needs those corporations anymore.
The middleman is only good for one thing.
That one thing is: Nothing.
The artists and/or content producers do not need middlemen dipping into their profits in order to get ahead. Why that business model works in the mainstream world is simple. If you were a broke-ass and someone offered you five million dollars to produce whatever it is you do, you'd sign the contract, even though that five million is only a ten percent cut of the entire potential profit.
Many people want to be rich and famous, the easy way, and they'll do anything to get it, even if it means making ridiculous business deals to get there. You can actually see this happening now, on the Steemit trending page.
Moving on.
Now
I'm going to use Alex Jones as an example.
I am not a fan of Alex Jones but I do enjoy some of his work.
I love his business model.
Many think he is a provider of news.
In reality, he is an independent performer in the arts and entertainment industry.
Much of his success stems from his online presence.
He built his own website, provides his own unique form of entertainment to content consumers, has his own line of merchandise in the form of everything from shirts, hats, supplements, and of course more media content to purchase and consume.
He did everything right except piss off a few of the big media outlets that don't like to see independent artists thrive. Doesn't matter though. The man has a net worth of ten million today. He done good!
What am I getting at?
Simple stuff.
Not many seem to see potential in content producers on this blockchain. Investors think their role in all of this is the most important. Developers think it's them who do everything and deserve the most. Content producers seem to come in last, which is silly, in my mind, because of those potential billions that can and most likely will trickle their way into this blockchain, provided the folks working to impede the progress of actual talent around here, stop doing that.
Content producers, developers, and investors will all work together, someday, hopefully, much like every other successful business.
Maybe the Alex Jones types can't come to Steemit and expect to be successful now, under the current conditions; but what's stopping them from taking that entire business model I mentioned above, creating an app that runs on this blockchain (instead of the traditional website approach) and an SMT, cutting out the middleman completely, and taking the world by storm?
Nothing
Nothing will stop them.
That's the future, right there. Provided everyone can actually wrap their head around the simple fact the arts and entertainment industry generates billions each year.
Part of the big name content creators success will be the simple fact many will want to get their hands on those ALEX tokens. People will be able to earn more rewards for enjoying Alex Jones content if they hold more of the SMT, much like how we have Steem Power now. Discounts on merchandise can be offered. The more Alex Power one has, the cheaper the merchandise. Purchasing Alex Power would be much like buying a subscription. Access to exclusive content only available to hodlers. I could go on and on (like Alex Jones).
Sure, there can and will be apps that cater to a specific niche. We won't see the National Geographic App right out of the gates, but we will see independent online magazines start from nothing and begin to flourish. Like I said, the mainstream stuff will be far behind the curve, busy protecting their old fashioned ways.
A group like Insane Clown Posse, with a net worth of 35 million, sold over 6.5 million records, and still tours today after 29 years of being on the scene independently, would be all over something like this if it happened twenty years ago. They too embraced the online world long before the mainstream and made a metric shit-ton of money by staying ahead of the curve. Love them or hate them, they're one of the most successful independent acts in the history of music. Their loyal fans purchase everything they put out and that would include a special token that comes with certain perks.
Plenty of independent acts in the music business will catch on fast, long before the mainstream stuff. We'll see apps for artists and apps for online record labels hosting their own roster of unique talent. Many big names of the future will start out in this fashion.
Wise investors will scout talent. If they see potential, they're going to want a piece of that pie. The earlier they get in, the better. Instead of investing in the hype so many cryptocurrencies put forth these days, an investor can say, "That kid has talent, she's going somewhere, in ten years she'll be worth millions."
Nearly all independent online talent will most likely be interested in this blockchain app/tokenized approach. Right now many of them will ask for donations. If they had investors, it's a game changer, and they'll do everything they can to get in on it.
(Remember what I said in: The Business of Blogging and How To Take Over The World?)
Big names will come later, once their contracts/death sentences with the big media corporations are finished. Hopefully they'll have the business sense of an independent, because they'll be on their own.
Wishful thinking?
A man can dream, right? Far better than FUD.
Where do I fit in? I could do the same. Create my own app, my own token. I'm already invested in this bright future though. I'll have thousands of STEEM, sitting here, waiting for the masses to come and buy more so they can set up their new online business models and begin to enjoy what some of us have already been doing for over two years (three years now).
This isn't financial advice. I could be dead wrong, but you don't see me panic selling. Just think about how many millions of content producers there are in this world. Many already have their own apps and businesses. This isn't anything new, what's coming is simply, better.
Sometimes I look around this place. I'm not sure where it's headed; people in the know are quiet. The vision; the general populace seems to be lacking one. What I just said was my vision, my opinion. I like what I see.
The point I'd really like to drive home today though is the fact: One single content producer can do one hell of a lot more than many folks around here seem to realize, given the right tools, support, and platform.
End of eight month old article.

Look at this STEEM place,
today.
Many people have been saying, "We want SMTs!"
I don't think many of those saying that even had a plan of what to do with them once they arrived...
I'm sure you can see it all now though, especially when you take a good hard look at what Steem Engine is able to provide.
If @neoxian can start up his own 'City', what's going to stop Joe Rogan?
Joe Rogan will produce his content, upload it to Youtube; thousands upon thousands of comments pour in, daily.
Those comments could be posts, and those commentators could be earning perks in the form of cryptocurrency. And that's only the basics.
In my previous post on this topic:
The Business of Blogging and How To Take Over The World
I was offering everyone a glimpse of the potential of small business here on this blockchain. Investing in content producers. I'm quite confident, that concept within this context is my invention. Now try to imagine the potential of big business. Shouldn't be as hard to see it now as it was eight months ago when everyone thought I was crazy.
In business:
- Always be one step ahead of everyone else.
EXPLETIVEthe middleman.- Think big or don't think at all.
Have a nice day.


Yes, Steem Inc has dragged their feet on SMT, but it exists now in the form of Tribes on the Steem-engine. I'm no Alex Jones or Joe Rogan, but I'm demonstrating what can be done with a tribe. The new token has breathed life into my city like nothing else before.
#palnet
#steemleo
When I saw you do that, I knew what I wrote what seems like an eternity ago in STEEM months was coming to fruition. You are not Alex Jones or Joe Rogan. Not even an Alex Rogan or a Joe Jones. Doesn't really matter. What matters is the potential. Proof of concept. Solid.
I'm hopeful for the future of this platform, which is why I keep accumulating. I don't think it's realistic to expect the cake to be fully baked right away. It's going to be a learning process. I'm not sure what the outcome of the next hard fork will be, but at the very least it will get people thinking about the reward mechanism.
Many people feel powerless and fear reprisal for speaking out. In time I think people will recognize the necessity of building alliances for the purpose of influencing behavior, such as unmitigated bid bot use. Especially the behavior of the established power base who either endorses it or looks the other way.
Takes a lot of time, but to see things one way, eight months ago, to now watching it all unfold, eight months later; time and patience are important.
That, I never understood. I've been quite outspoken here at times for nearly three years. Maybe it's all in the delivery. Some people do a terrible job of expressing their grievances. I'm not saying I'm perfect but I have seen some folks be insulting, they'll offer up misinformation, lies. They bully and harass other members. Then they get downvoted as a consequence of their own antisocial behavior, then use that as fuel to say they're not allowed to speak; pulling the victim card. Others see the downvotes, but not the actions that led up to it, believe the lies and that's how rumors start.
Part of the problem here is when people are targeted for perpetual downvotes, rather than simply their discrete abuse actions. If you are downvoting the actual act, the reason is probably clear. If you are witnessing an automated downvote campaign against a person, that's something different. Maybe it's justified or maybe it isn't, either way I'm just not sure it's healthy optics. When I see someone attempting to engage in a discussion with no immediate abuse involved, and it is downvoted along with a vague open threat against me or others for attempting to interact with them, we'll that's just plain toxic to look at. As on onlooker, it should be clear to me why these actions are occurring, simply to prevent 'lies and rumors'. At least downvotes from the Cheetah bot provide the possible reasons for the campaign, as well as a clear avenue to seek redress. That should be the minimum standard. The ideal standard would be a transparent evidentiary report describing the 'actions that led up to it'.
I agree. It's annoying having to dig to find out the reasons why some of these folks are auto-downvoted. In a few of the most recent cases, I've seen people intentionally put themselves in that position to be auto-downvoted. Remove the downvotes and they just go back to being abusive. Been here three years. It's almost always the same story. Some people eventually get the hint and start working on being social again. I do agree though, it does look like crap without a reason offered.
I appreciate the whole business model that Steemit created. It was a nice idea, in theory. However, I think a lot of people on STEEM get tunnel vision when looking at the current forward face of the platform.
Steem isn't social media.
Steem isn't a place for content creators to get paid.
It's just a string of archaic block information.
I think we'll really start going places when people stop looking at what Steem is today. A lot of people around here have tunnel vision.
Steem is a LEGO set.
We've got some pretty powerful building blocks here that are going completely unutilized. For example, how many dapps are using the memo key?
Do you realize how much work it would take to incorporate encrypted chatrooms directly on chain using custom JSON? It would be SO EASY... I can't believe it hasn't happened yet. No more centralized agents having full access to all our data and profiting off it. Everything encrypted. Suck it, corporations.
No one wants to make shit like this because there is no money in it. That is the crux of Steem; we need a stronger open source community.
Once we have enough altruistic developers that have stake, they'll all try to outdo one another, and everyone wins.
There is money in it. I've been here three years though and not many see the value of an attention economy, so instead of building that chat, they build things that contribute to people being paid to not even be here. Horrendous waste of resources, but they don't care, because a few thousand worth of a token constantly dropping in value is more important to them than being billionaires, and it drives me crazy. So what would help is if more business savvy folks came along to show these kids how to do something right. Don't do it for the money today, do it for the money down the road once the seeds are planted and start growing. The generation of entitlement doesn't understand that. They think apples grow on grocery store shelves.
Yeah I do think there is potential here for those who like to entertain the world. But not sure about this tribalism stuff. I like your analogy though. The establishment will hate concepts like this until they find some way to make money off it OR to control it. Thanks man.
Right now Youtube is pushing out the independents. The independent producers always outnumber the ones who work for the corporations. They're always looking for a new home. The house is built.
Well said! I'm old enough to remember the arrival of .mp3 files and the demise of Napster, but what I love about this place is you can experiment and try things you could never do anywhere else..., that is and get something back... whether it be crap or otherwise.
Before March 2018 I had never wrote a thing, and here I am writing stories of my life, and now fiction. It's not elegant or professional but I enjoy doing it.
If only more would do the same and stop trying to make a quick buck. The place still has potential in my eyes even though StInc are trying to suppress the blogging part of it.
Maybe they like to suppress the blogging part because they don't realize the creatives can reinvent it and turn it into something people want to see. They think it can only be one way, the old way, and since that doesn't work in their eyes, they can't see the picture bigger, or even know what people like us are capable of.
Good old Napster and good old Metallica. Napster being gone stopped absolutely nothing, Metallica found their new youth with the latest album though, they are still rocking like crazy. Basically they only screwed themselves when they attacked Napster back in the day, piracy can never die.
They screwed themselves, for a bit, then realized the potential of the technology. People were making tapes and tapping into unscrambled satellite signals long before the internet. Piracy won't die, but these days there are fewer reasons to pirate. Look how well Steam does for gaming. All that is is the old warez site, with the option to pay. People do like to pay.
I remember that post, remember thinking for not the first time they should hire you to do their marketing...I don't know why I didn't comment on it, but I flipped through my blog and found I did resteem it lol.
It reminded me I haven't seen @brandt in awhile, hope he makes a comeback.
I hear that a lot. I'd feel more comfortable having an advisory role. It does get kind of annoying some days, sitting here behind yet another failed attempt at comedy or freaking people out with my art, when I can do more. So I do this stuff, these writings, that more often than not got overlooked for three years. Or maybe some read, but refuse to vote, because it's me... Things are getting better though, now that I can drop my words in a few places and gain some organic visibility. Today I'm not even going to drop this link anywhere, so I can gauge more accurately if the community is behind this sort of thing. Why am I rambling?
I just saw brandt the other day. Stopped in and enjoyed the re-release of Haffanower. I was testing the waters there with that post and it seems there's still not enough interest for something like that.
Now there needs to be a connection between the blockchain and the Alex Jones and Joe Rogans. The connection is called marketing. First they have to know STEEM exists, then they have to know how the blockchain can serve them.
Joe Rogan already knows about the place. Our trending page was shown on his Youtube channel one day. I'm sure they browsed through it and saw the mess. I wrote about that incident a couple of times. We dodged a bullet that day. Two days before the site was shown on his youtube channel during one of his episodes, whales were acting like trolls, arguing and flagging one another. It was embarrassing, but the stuff seen on Joe's podcast was at least somewhat presentable.
Think all that being paid to look away seems to be one reason why a number of people (who have been here long enough anyway) keep bolting to other interfaces (of which we have no shortage now XD).
The being paid to look away part was this platforms biggest blunder.
You nailed it with that Alex Jones example!
I have been here for 2 years and Indeed I have seen all the drama!!! I still do believe that SMTs will open up limlitless opportunities for this blockchain.
I am already seeing what Steem Engine is doing and I can say that it is a sucess. The sports tribe is having a blast on sportstalk already.
There are limitless possibilities on this blockchain. Let us all wait for HF21 and also the release of SMTs and see what happens ahead!!
Provided people know what to do with those SMTs, yes, they'll be a nice addition. I certainly won't be buying up huge piles of everything that comes onto the scene though.
The sports thing is exactly like the small magazine starting from scratch and flourishing; something I mentioned in the post from eight months ago.
I am excited about the sports thing because I am happy because finally I am a whale there!!!
Your predictions 8 months ago were really spot on..
I am waiting for your post on Trump's tweet about cryptocurrency!!!
I'm Canadian so I don't really pay much attention to that guy. What did he say this time?
He said he is not a fan of Bitcoin and any other Crypto, he had a thread and you can check out his Twitter thread