2015 Vs 1998 Wynn's Sex Ed Curriculum Goes Back To The Future

in #news6 years ago (edited)

Hey steemitrons! The sex ed curriculum has been a point of contention in Ontario, ever since it's revision was announced by (the hideous) Kathleen Wynne back in 2015.

IMG_3184.JPG

Now before to form any opinions on my political stance. I'd like to state that I think ford is just as gross as that old 'wynnebag'. In fact, I think all politicians (left or right) are gross pigs, who will do whatever they are told in order to get their daily slop poured into their troughs. But I digress.

Before I continue, the original article link here

One more thing before I start. In 2015, Ontario premier Kathleen wynne (Lesbian) and Benjamin Levin (convicted pedophile) Co-penned and radically changed the sex ed curriculum in Ontario schools. Teaching children that their gender is fluid among many things. To reiterate: Ben Levin is a CONVICTED PEDOPHILE!


"Parents as First Educators, Real Women of Canada and a network of parental rights advocates that includes Campaign Life Coalition, have all come out strongly to condemn the limited parental consultation process being used by the Wynne Liberals to get the curriculum approved even before it’s officially released. The sex ed curriculum should have been an election issue so that voters could have had a real and transparent consultation process with their vote. But why bother to let democracy get in the way of political correctness. Ontarians has been misled." 9



"Parents should not be misled and confuse school violence, bullying and the proper use of social media with the need to teach children all the details about sex at a young age. To address cyberbullying and sexting issues can best be done with the help of companies that provide the service and parental involvement. Let’s not confuse school safety with the perverted notion of children being used as objects of sex because the agenda of political correctness entitles them, and even some groups at the United Nations agree, to have “sexual rights.” This right is just as false the “reproductive right” to kill a baby in the womb. This corrupts language and leads to behaviour that’s immoral.." 5



No, fuck you. Put it all back into the box and let's ask what the people of Ontario want in a sex ed curriculum for their children? I mean they already kind of voted what they wanted. But anyways.


Ok, I don't know what most parents do, but in my house we tell the kids the words for their body parts (including genitals). If all else fails, the kid could always point to the body part. Unless it's an internal organ issue. Generally it's pretty easy to figure out where the boo boo is.


In my day, you're taught to be nice to everyone ( all inclusive). But nowadays they teach 3rd graders all about invisible issues, but won't tell them how a sperm and egg make a baby?

That says it all. Confuse them with all this made up nonsense, but say human reproduction. This is programmed degeneracy.


Pretty sure kids are learning well enough about cyber bullying and all that. There's constant campaigns in schools these days about this stuff.

However, I do agree about earlier puberty. This is the result of all the chemicals that kids today are frequently exposed to. Will they teach them about that? No!

I wouldn't claim that the 1998 is perfect in anyway. Improvements to be made (although, it's not entirely necessary imo) But, what they had in 1998 is way better than that (#Agenda2030) pedo manual they created in 2015.


Grade 5 doesn't sound like a big deal. They still learn what they need to in grade 6. Non issue, moving on.

Essentially 2015's grade 6 seeks to completely normalize and even force kids to question themselves when this is completely unnecessary at that age.

Golden rule, treat others the way you want to be treated. This covers all that inclusivity stuff without the normalization. With today's television and social media. Kids are exposed to all of this stuff anyway. The gender issue is a made up social construct, and the LGBT representation is completely disproportionate to the numbers. But that's the whole agenda isn't it?


I see what you did there. ;)


I like the 1998 version much better for sure. "Two spirited"? Is this Narnia? Close, its narcissism. People want to be different, they want to stand out. There's a clear case of contagion in schools where kids are seeing all these kids getting the special treatment for being confused and wanting to stand out themselves. In my day it was pogs and marbles, today its genders and sex blockers. Its mental illness normalized. And intersex? What that's like maybe 10 kids in all of Ontario.

Thanks for reading. Sorry if I come off a bit rough around the edges. But, I see what is being done here and I'm pissed off. This is not in the interest of children. It's an agenda to normalize mental illness and sexual degeneracy. To reverse sex roles and make "everyone belong to everyone else"

Buckle up buckaroos, we're heading into a Brave New World!

References - http://www.realwomenofcanada.ca/ten-reasons-to-reject-wynnes-sex-education-curriculum

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 59388.79
ETH 2578.59
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.47