Why The Status Quo Hates Trump - It's Not About A Wall

While the mainstream media is obsessively focused on Trump's intention of building a wall on the southern border of the U.S. it is downplaying the biggest story in recent history, the auditing and eventual dismantling of the Federal Reserve.

Historically, building walls have never been a good idea.

Regardless of how you feel or what you think about President Trump, getting rid of the Federal Reserve and putting the power of issuing money in the hands of Congress, as our constitution clearly states is the law of the land, would restore the value of our currency we all work so hard for.

The current Federal Reserve system is a central bank that ensures we are always in debt we'll never be able to pay back essentially enslaving future generations.

It's purposely made to sound very complicated so we never understand the deception. If you're not familiar with how the Fed works this video explains it in simple terms.

The Federal Reserve is not a government organization, it's a private banking cartel that has taken over our country's money supply and charges us for it. It works like just like a Ponzi scheme and puts the entire country in its debt.

Each time money is created or lent the banking cartel gets to lend it out again and again and charge interest for it, but the biggest secret is that while the banks create the money that gets lent out, they don't create the interest needed to pay those loans. That means that not all the loans can be paid back and it guarantees that some of those loans will default or claim bankruptcy.

source

Plus, each time the money supply is increased its scarcity decreases along with its purchasing power. That's called inflation and it's why, in part, the cost of everything you buy goes up over time. It's not that things are getting more expensive each year, it's the value of money is decreasing so it costs more to buy the same things today then it did in the past. The whole system is built on debt that future generations will have to pay. The debt is so large that we have to create more money just to pay the interest. It is not a sustainable system and ensures there will be losers and perpetual debt.

Trump wants to do away with this system and return the power of issuing money back to Congress and the people, something that was written in the U.S. Constitution

source

If we were to replace the inflationary U.S. dollar with a programmable digital currency, like Bitcoin, with a fixed supply that could not be manipulated by politicians of central banks, now or in the future and made it the national money this could solve the problem of perpetual debt and inflation.

source

Not only would this remove the perpetual debt, but it would also restore the value of our currency and stop the spiraling inflation eroding our purchasing power. Since politicians, especially Democrats, and governments thrive on this perpetual debt they are fighting it tooth and nail because it would remove their parasitic ability to drain our economy we all work so hard to support.

Interestingly enough, only two other presidents ever tried to end the federal reserve system; Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Both were assassinated.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Rothschild Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business.

We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed this Order, it returned to the United States federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency – money – without going through the privately owned Rothschild Federal Reserve Bank.

It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value.

Executive Order 11110 would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new “money”.

Executive Order 11,110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

Just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 “Silver Certificates” were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation.

Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Rothschild Federal Reserve’s control over the creation of money.

It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the “powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance”. source

source

Do you see the real reason politicians hate Trump so much? Interestingly, they don't say exactly why they really are against him because if they did it would bring this issue into the light of public debate and if the public knew more about this they would support Trump doing this.

Personally, I don't like a lot of the things that Trump supports. I think building a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, a friendly neighbor, is a joke. But I do think to free the nation from the endless debt that we're passing on to future generations and paying interest to a foreign bank for issuing money to the nation when our own Constitution protects and warns us not to do that is a good idea. We can legally create our own interest-free money and save our future generations from the burden of enslaving debt and stop the value of our hard earned money from losing its purchasing power.

That's why they attack him about everything he does except this. This topic is too dangerous for it to enter the public debate as it would unveil the corruption of our current monetary system. The media never talks about Trump trying to restore our right to issue our own money because that would change the whole game.

Would in their right mind wants to be in perpetual debt they and their childrens children can never get out of? Why wouldn't you want to get out from under that debt? Why wouldn't anyone, regardless of their political views, want the money they work so hard for to retain its purchasing power over time? Again, regardless of what you think about Trump, this would be good for everyone. But, don't take my word for it. Watch this video and see for yourself that Trump is working to do exactly that.

What do you think about Trump wanting to get rid of the Federal Reserve?

---

Related Posts

---

The monetary system is confusing and maybe it's even made this way in order to hide what is really going on. What we should know that many of us don't know is that a big part of the money supply in the UK and US lies under "fractional reserve banking", known in the US as the Federal Reserve. Have you heard of the Federal Reserve? If you haven't don't be misled by its name, it is neither federal government owned, nor has reserves.

---

Carbon tax credits sound like a good idea on the surface. Who doesn't like the idea of cleaner air and water? Putting incentives in place that drive industrial and commercial processes in the direction of low emissions or less carbon-intensive approaches than those used when there is no cost to emitting carbon dioxide sounds like a good thing. Right? I'm not so sure it's really working out the way it was intended.

---

Luzcypher's Announcement For Steem Witness