Thanks for the feedback. I am still debating with myself what would be better, short or long posts. I know, from first experience of course, that I prefer my conversations with people to have many quiet long moments. Not many people find this appealing as we, humans, are trained to relate to the world and other people through the mind mostly. And so am I, in my impersonal interactions. But when meeting someone who is more inclined to the heart, I have found out that I enjoy tremendously just sitting with them, often gazing into the horizon, holding their hand is that is appropriate for that specific kind of meeting 😉 The art of conversing with no words is a lost and rather forgotten one, sadly so. Even in pure matters of the heart, romantic relationships that is, people are eager to jump into the info/data arena. While it's quite intriguing on the first stages of the interaction, genuine knowing of the other is achieved only in silence. So, the same with writing on Steemit, I often wonder what would be best for the readers, a short or a long post. So far the scale has been leaning been to the latter. Your words are perceptive. In the past years I have taught myself to write between the words, an enigmatic skill that I came to know through the Seth books. I believe, therefore, that most of my posts are woven with more than just text. You get two points for capturing that 😉

It took me until November last year to once and for all realise that the mental fog won't clear as long as I don't understand that the thoughts' swaying to and fro will never stop unless I choose to make a final decision

Oh, yeah. Definitely. If there was one tip I would give to young people (in age) from my old vantage point it would be this – don't wait for the supernatural/soul/angel/higher-self to come and save you, tell you what to do, guide you, etc. The soul rejoices in every dualistic experience that the human goes through and really doesn't care about morality or consequences. The I AM, for example, would be totally ok with the human stuck for many years and lifetimes with the same soul-mate/twin-flame, even though the soul knows that the value-fulfilment is somewhat impeded in that relationship. The reason is that the I AM has the vantage point of all life-times, parallel occurrences, and therefore while experiencing (through the human) a tangled relationship in one life time, the soul does experience as well a fully completed relationship where the human and their counterpart are both fully realized. (Incidentally, I will publish a post about counterparts on this coming Friday). So, IMO, your choice was a pivotal point in your life. I had a similar one, a few years ago, relating to a soul-aspect. But I must confess that during that occurrence, since I was so unaware and entangled, my soul-self did come and provided a guidance, though in a very very subtle way, never dictating or forcing the right course of action. That time, as far as I am aware, was the only time I have received such a direct guidance from my soul-self. Therefore, my above words about the scarcity of soul-guidance.

Anyway, the basic rules of life are rather simple. Quoting you quoting me: 😉

presence in the moment, feeling the joy in simple things, simplicity in itself