You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DEEPFAKE - we can no longer trust our eyes

in #life5 years ago (edited)

Greetings @neavvy, great article, a few days ago I was reading about this precisely, and it is that draws much attention to where you can focus the use of this technology, because as in everything there is its good side and its bad side, and of course it is necessary to emphasize that as many look for the good there are those who look for the evil and sometimes harming or distorting for what really this technology was created ... what so to say it dirty the face to what perhaps can be something good, because suppose we have some very famous artist and you have a song that fascinates you, with this technology although the artist is deceased could create again a music video which for all the technology at disposal probably has a brutal quality, compared to the original and not It's wrong, but well, as I told you before, there's something wrong with the case you raised about Macron's supposed message ...
Socially this can affect us more or less depending on the position we occupy, but what if it is something that is very easy to elaborate any of our environment could do and is that at the rate we are going all technology is perfecting it to the point of doing it simpler for its use in some cases facilitating it to all (in some cases). I think that to detect when those messages are false, there is going to be a lot of work in this, since we would have to develop an artificial intelligence that is exclusively responsible for it or adapt the program that is already used to create by means of reengineering for that purpose.

Sort:  

Thank you for such an amazing reply @jjqf

in everything there is its good side and its bad side

I agree in 100%, this an ultimate truth that always needs to be considered. Especially in terms of technology development.

I think that to detect when those messages are false, there is going to be a lot of work in this, since we would have to develop an artificial intelligence that is exclusively responsible for it or adapt the program that is already used to create by means of reengineering for that purpose.

AI detecting deepfake is a really interesting conception, but I'm curious about its efficiency. It would probably work like computer viruses - they are always one step ahead of anti viruses.

As such, I share your opinion @neavvy, and that is how it will be, but with time we hope we can make it work as well as possible and avoid misunderstandings.

with time we hope we can make it work as well as possible and avoid misunderstandings

Definitely :) I think we will be able to do that at least on some level.

What an amazing reply @jjqf :)

It's a pleasure to read comments like the one you wrote. Steemit definetly need more people like you.

ps.
Would you perhaps consider using "enter" from time to time? To separate blocks of texts? It would make it much easier to read.

Cheers, Piotr

Thanks @crypto.piotr for considering my comment as such, for me a compliment coming from someone like you.
Yes, with regard to the organization, if I know how they would say here "mala mia" similar to my mistake

Dear @jjqf

compliment coming from someone like you.

Stop it .... I'm already blushing :)

Cheers, Piotr

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 61769.55
ETH 2910.04
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.64