Steem-Travelers. Check for uniqueness: Less than 80%, additional verification needed

in #js2 years ago (edited)
Sort:  

@alexmove.witness

Thanks for the mention, I have already taken the corresponding measures, issuing the first warning of plagiarism and silencing the post.

If you need, tell me and I'll fix the mention. Now I will mention in every comment
@hive-111293 @ponpase @rafaelcmontero @udyliciouz @willeusz

I can add or remove someone if needed.

This user will be muted thank you very much! :)

Thank you.

I am now watching his post - it is very short, because of this, apparently 75% of uniqueness.

It is obvious that the author took a paragraph of text and redid it a little. But not enough to make the check fail. Due to the small total volume of the text, the percentage of uniqueness is below 80%.

Still, the signals are only recommendations, and perhaps in this case, the mute was too strict, what do you think?

image.png

Thank you for your report.

Have you guaranteed that this post is really plagiarism?.

My checking manually, shows no plagiarism to the link you entered.

Even I didn't find the same vocabulary in the post.

Thank you, make sure to check manually, translate (english-indonesia / indonesian-english)

Thank you for your comment.

Have you guaranteed that this post is really plagiarism?.

Checks draw the attention of moderators and community administrators. The check is for uniqueness, but not for plagiarism. Plagiarism is a more complex concept, and the decision about it can be made by the administrator or moderator.

So, this is not about the definition of plagiarism, but about the definition of non-uniqueness.

My checking manually, shows no plagiarism to the link you entered.

You can check it yourself using the site https://content-watch.ru/text/

image.png

Text uniqueness: 88.0%

http://thespicerouteend.com/west-sumatra-bukittinggi-travel-guide/ 8.8%

https://www.traveloka.com/en-id/activities/indonesia/city/padang-101687 8.1%

Thanks for your confirmation. Great job !

Some vocabularies may get the same, it is related to addresses, objects, or subjects that are commonly used on external webs.

So, if we review travel posts, we might find the same vocabulary from several external websites. However, that doesn't mean they are plagiarizing.

Unless they have quoted it directly from an external web, it can be categorized as plagiarism.

This post not plagiarism,

Cc @willeusz @rafaelcmontero

Thanks for checking. My goal is to inform about uniqueness below 80%, but it is important to make the final decision only after manual verification.

Thanks again.

@ponpase is right, non uniqueness Is about data relates to names, address, or historical facts. I don't think we have plagiarism here. @rafaelcmontero

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 62312.95
ETH 2458.75
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.65