Putting an End to Potential Misinformation About Craig Sawyer
Not too long ago, I stumbled upon an article that suggested Craig Sawyer of V4CR has a net worth of 18 million. This information played allot into the author’s theory that Craig Sawyer is working for the “Deep State”. Or that he should not be asking for donations while sitting on that much cash.
The financial claim made was hinged upon a screenshot which was snapped from this site. The article was penned by one Tom Ford.
Apparently, when entering in the chart information for his post, Ford must have mixed and matched data from two different Craigs one who is Craig E., and one who is Craig R. Craig R. is the one who heads up V4CR.
Screenshot of networthpost.org
What can we learn from this? Trust but verify, check and double check, redact when incorrect or unsure. I personally think that the infighting among people who support various groups that rescue children or takedown child traffickers is stupid.
There really is no need in picking sides. If both of the two groups are doing the best they can while using different methods and tactics, then I think that it’s best that we laud their victories. If they do something that seems off certainly go ahead and investigate as you see fit.
Yet this game of jumping to wild conclusions, or condemning parties for not taking the advice of psychics and remote viewers about alleged underground cities seems like a bunch of nonsense to me.
V4CR will be releasing a documentary whereby people will be able to judge this group by the fruits that their efforts have borne.
I for one will suspend any judgments about either organization until I can examine what acts of good these groups have accomplished.
As far as money is concerned, if a person can make money while doing the right thing, I don’t see anything wrong with that. A job is a job is a job.
Curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8
Ways you can help the @informationwar
why did he protect clinton and john mccain before he became a pedo hunter? why did they take his pension away? hes compromised, and now he is a CIA asset. his mission is to Not shine the pedo alert spotlight 🚨 on the HIGHEST level pedos, which is what we need to do. plus craig sawyer is stupid. he makes that video of all that evidence with rape trees, and then he goes and says “oh nvm” never mentioning CARLOS SLIM the owner of Cemex. just a thought
He worked for a security firm. Who is to say if he had a say on who he was protecting or how long the mission was? Those high profile names probably did wonders for bolstering his resume though.
It may have been part of a group contract that was put into place to protect multiple politicians and those were just the most high profile names.
He definitely did contradict himself between the two different videos. However, in the one video he did say that he initially had concerns and shared his opinion about them.
He arrived at the scene expecting to confirm certain reports that there were children being held at the area in question. What he found if you listen to that video was no one he could arrest or save. His group is a tactical group that rescues children and takes down people who abuse them.
That particular scene had neither any children, or anyone to arrest. These guys aren't a forensics team, they are in the business of rescuing children and taking down the bad guys. As for that questionable video it was filled with a myriad of edits.
It almost seemed like a tactic to prevent his company from legal claims that might be leveled at him if he or his group were to inadvertently slander someone or some entity by making claims about the goings on at someone else's land without having rock solid proof of these claims.
Ultimately, there has to be some kind of proof. The skull found was apparently 30 miles in another direction. So it wasn't even the same site. All I know is, why not judge these groups by their fruits? Why don't you look into how many children they've saved or bad guys they've taken down? See if there is some measurable good being done.
Contraland hasn't even come out yet, watch the video when it comes out on Netflix. Maybe the entire scope of his mission is a little bit more nuanced that you might imagine. Or put yourself in his shoes if you were rescuing children or arresting their abusers what exactly could you do with a site that's already received national media coverage if there are no bad guys there to arrest or children to save?
My main point with this article was to point out potential misinformation about his alleged net worth, as the article that I read hinged a majority of their corruption theory based on his alleged net worth.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and opinions on the matter @web-gnar!