You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Putting an End to Potential Misinformation About Craig Sawyer
why did he protect clinton and john mccain before he became a pedo hunter? why did they take his pension away? hes compromised, and now he is a CIA asset. his mission is to Not shine the pedo alert spotlight 🚨 on the HIGHEST level pedos, which is what we need to do. plus craig sawyer is stupid. he makes that video of all that evidence with rape trees, and then he goes and says “oh nvm” never mentioning CARLOS SLIM the owner of Cemex. just a thought
He worked for a security firm. Who is to say if he had a say on who he was protecting or how long the mission was? Those high profile names probably did wonders for bolstering his resume though.
It may have been part of a group contract that was put into place to protect multiple politicians and those were just the most high profile names.
He definitely did contradict himself between the two different videos. However, in the one video he did say that he initially had concerns and shared his opinion about them.
He arrived at the scene expecting to confirm certain reports that there were children being held at the area in question. What he found if you listen to that video was no one he could arrest or save. His group is a tactical group that rescues children and takes down people who abuse them.
That particular scene had neither any children, or anyone to arrest. These guys aren't a forensics team, they are in the business of rescuing children and taking down the bad guys. As for that questionable video it was filled with a myriad of edits.
It almost seemed like a tactic to prevent his company from legal claims that might be leveled at him if he or his group were to inadvertently slander someone or some entity by making claims about the goings on at someone else's land without having rock solid proof of these claims.
Ultimately, there has to be some kind of proof. The skull found was apparently 30 miles in another direction. So it wasn't even the same site. All I know is, why not judge these groups by their fruits? Why don't you look into how many children they've saved or bad guys they've taken down? See if there is some measurable good being done.
Contraland hasn't even come out yet, watch the video when it comes out on Netflix. Maybe the entire scope of his mission is a little bit more nuanced that you might imagine. Or put yourself in his shoes if you were rescuing children or arresting their abusers what exactly could you do with a site that's already received national media coverage if there are no bad guys there to arrest or children to save?
My main point with this article was to point out potential misinformation about his alleged net worth, as the article that I read hinged a majority of their corruption theory based on his alleged net worth.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and opinions on the matter @web-gnar!