Black Helicopters Were Once a Crazy Conspiracy TheorysteemCreated with Sketch.

in #informationwar4 years ago (edited)

Mainstream media outlets have long used the term “Black Helicopters” as a pejorative to smear conspiracy theorists. Loaded in their not-so-subtle implications is the notion that proponents of their existence are “crazy.” In media, they associate the term conspiracy theorist with ideas that fall far from the law of parsimony.

A conspiracy is when two or more people agree to commit an unlawful, wrong, or evil act. Because of the illegal nature of the agreement, the wildest conspiracies are seldom, if ever unraveled. This, because the more traction a conspiracy theory gains, the more remarkable it becomes and conspirators rarely achieve this quality via simple means.

Consider a magician and how they perform magic tricks with deception and sleight of hand. They will also use gimmicks to convey a specific illusion to the audience. The intricate moves are far from simple to accomplish and require much practice to achieve.

Therefore, I would argue that Occam’s razor is not a good rule to apply to some-of-the more impressive events. On these occasions, the simplest of explanations rarely apply, for if they did, there would be no there-there, and also no sense of bewilderment for people to fixate upon, as an adequately solved mystery brings theorizing to a halt.

That said, back to the black helicopters. Here, the conspiracy that the government is using black helicopters near civilian populations is a proven fact. This, because people observed black helicopters and reported on them. The simplest solution is that we know helicopters exist and we know that black paint exists too (1+1=2).


The government will use strawman arguments to muddle damn near anything they want, including classified radar-evasive technologies, which may or may not have been born at Area 51. Take as an example the Sikorsky HH-60 Pave Hawk; some suggest these were the helicopters run by Seal Team Six for the alleged “assassination” of Osama bin Laden, just before his “respectful burial at sea.”

Before that, remarks about little green men, UFOs, and cow mutilations would often accompany any talk about black helicopters. The media branch of government has made a fine art out of derailing a logical narrative with 'well-poisoning' tactics. It takes a learned eye to see it, yet once you’re capable it’s something one cannot ignore.

So, the next time you hear a crazy conspiracy, consider removing from it some less plausible details. UFO’s are a great example; we know that men make classified flying machines. Is it possible that men have made flying discs? It seems likely to me.

I can make that possibility seem silly if I point to a flying disc and say: “That’s a Pleiadian ship, stolen by either a reptilian or gray, you can tell by the flying pattern." That’s where conspiracy theories jump the shark when people add too much intricate and unprovable background noise.


By 1953 a U.S. Air Force Officer called Edward Ruppelt coined the term UFO, to replace the words flying saucer. As I’m sure you can imagine, flying saucer carried lots of baggage with it after Hollywood released the film ‘War of the Worlds’ that same year. The film depicted flying saucers from Mars. Now the new term for UFO is UAP which stands for unidentified aerial phenomena.

Long story short, there’s a lot going on in this world, and it’s only normal human behavior to seek answers to the unexplainable. So we theorize and play what if games as if though we are detectives, and why shouldn’t we? Absent any plausible truth – people are compelled to either draw conclusions or connect the dots the best way they know how.

There’s nothing wrong with thinking aloud about the unknown. However, there's a fine line between when theory becomes a reality and when it's transformed into a complex belief system of which there is little evidence at hand to offer as proof. That’s when it’s gone off the rails and turned into a religion of sorts.

So whether you’re open or closed to conspiracies, one should be mindful of the fact that many historical conspiracy theories have already proven themselves to be factual, black helicopters being one of the myriads. Just try to reduce an outlandish theory to its most simple form by removing flourishes that people add, then rerun your plausibility assessment.

The images are brought to you courtesy of Pixabay! [1] [2]


Occam’s Razor is a wildly misused concept.
The razor is meant to shave off variables so that the equation is easier to solve.

One could just as easily use Occam's Razor to make a claim in favor of conspiracy.

You see three buildings fall like a house of cards.

Occam's Razor can easily be used to imply that the most obvious logical answer is that they were perfectly demolished, yet 90% of people on the street will look at you like a quack if mentioned.

The level of power that has been leveraged against the connotation of "conspiracy theory" is legendary. The masses have been painstakingly conditioned to associate this term with "false" no matter what.

It's really quite amazing work when you look at it from a non-biased perspective. We really do live in the age of information. Information, and the ability to manipulate it, seems to be the new driving force of the entire planet.

Thanks for your comment, @edicted. You know, I came to a similar conclusion as yourself about the seemingly flexible Occam’s razor. First, I went into it from the perspective that a well-calculated conspiracy would not be the best instance to apply the law too. A superbly performed conspiracy would imply one thing, yet make it happen via something unorthodox, so unorthodox that the most simple answer would be incorrect by design.

This is especially true in the case of false flags that convince an entire population about "who done it." On September 11th the conspirators did a piss-poor job. Then as I was writing, I decided to show that one could just as easily use the tool to pare down any unnecessary elements of a conspiracy contaminated with potential disinformation.

It's kind of like taking that poisoned well water and running it through a filter so as not to taint one’s perspective on the solid elements. I tell you my immediate reaction, and I noticed this recently when I’m first introduced to a conspiracy and it’s the more out there version, then it closes your mind off to the plausible parts. So I’m now actively trying to be careful as to not throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to considering these things.

I'm hoping I didn't misuse the concept. If I did, I did so in an attempt to make an accurate measurement. I'm not sure whether I was measuring the correct things or using the tool well. Hopefully, Occam's isn't the duct tape of philosophical concepts. (Extremely useful no matter who you are and how you apply it.) That might be something worth examining at a later time, as your illustration really brings that to the fore.

Curated for #informationwar (by @Gregorypatrick)

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

  • Upvote this comment or Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP or Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Hello @thoughts-in-time, thank you for sharing this creative work! We just stopped by to say that you've been upvoted by the @creativecrypto magazine. The Creative Crypto is all about art on the blockchain and learning from creatives like you. Looking forward to crossing paths again soon. Steem on!

Listen to the audio version, click to play.

Why are you copying @tts?

This really confuses me.

I think tts picks and chooses when it wants to.
I like this one better, it's faster and sounds dif.
I had mine posted before they posted here.

:- )

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.07
JST 0.030
BTC 23207.63
ETH 1667.35
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.63