RE: Content Thieves Banned From IW Curation
I am not stealing content, here is a email from Dianny thanking me for publishing her stuff, since I pay her out of my own pocket it the greeting has my real name included in it so that is the only part not showing:
Thank you again for putting through this donation to PatriotRetort.com. And for continuing to share the posts.
I really do appreciate it!
Dianny
http://patriotretort.com
I send her all the SBD earned from the post. I tried to get her to come to Steemit but she suffers from lupus and managing a additional site would be to difficult, so she agreed to let me publish her stuff, I give her the SBD earned and I keep the sp for taking the time to publish it. You can also check with @funbobby51 who also secured permission from DGM/Dianny to publish her stuff. There's also a disclaimer published at the end of every article.
What these people are trying to do is get me banned, Canadian coconut even said yesterday in a reply to me that since she can't ban me she will flag me, that tells you this is a back door attempt not only to censor what I have to say but ban me from this site. They even left a comment today have a nice swim, meaning their are trying to drown in a ocean of deceit that isn't even true.
Now I'd appreciate it if you would investigate with others, like @funbobby51 and Dianny to verify the truth to their accusations and remove my name off that list. Furthermore, this is just me, I have a very high repetition as a blogger, am very well known at Disqus, I am not deceitful or dishonest or own any sockpuppets.
We also do not want to curate people who are copying/pasting content even if they are approved. Feel free to continue to use the IW tag but the @informationwar account won't curate you.
I can't even read that, could you enlarge it, it does look like you lied and said I was making hundreds a week....her articles barely make the two dollar mark. I go and convert the SBD into USD, which actually paid her more for the content then what was listed as earned, this month, maybe SBD isn't trading as high but it came out to 11.45 cents. You are just not going to stop with your deceit and dishonesty, I can't even tell if she realizes it me or someone else you are talking about because I can't read it. I have never taken one dime from my account here, I don't need it, because I pay her out of my personal account of what the SBD is worth, the SBD going into my account here may even actually make me lose money if I do withdraw it, it may not even be worth as much as I gave her for it at the time if I do. Stop trying to disparage my character for not only doing something positive for her but helping information wars have more good quality content to share to it's member just because you are mad because I got into a go around with some friend of yours on the family protection channel. When you want to know what will one day make steemit fail all you have to do is look yourself in mirror, no censorship my ass, this site is full of censorship and information wars should be totally ashamed to call themselves that trying to help somebody undermine me and censor me.
Right click and view images. I contacted the person and asked her about it and that was her response, so stop lying.
You are making a profit off of other people's work even if you give them 50% or 60%, our curation isn't about upvoting other people's work that is copy and pasted. I meant to say hundreds in a few months, whatever.
There is no censorship here, you are only banned from being curated by the Informationwar account. Feel free to continue to use the tag if you want or do whatever you want. Everything posted onto Steem goes on the blockchain and it isn't censored.
You need some serious mental help, and I am saying this not to be mean or demean you at all but you are getting into unnecessary fights with lots of people. YOU are burning bridges with some of the biggest whales on this platform and you can certainly do that if you want, but don't expect people to be nice to you or curate you.
Please enlarge the text.
P.S. Don't think there isn't anybody else who can verify to her that I am not making hundred. Sometimes people just think they can get away with anything because they feel there's no other witnesses...but in this instance there is, that person will tell her what you said isn't the truth, they are on here and on another blog where we all know each other.
Furthermore your tag isn't worth following or providing material for. When you are going to use tactics to help your friend(s) silent somebody you are working against the meaning of IW, you are not deserving of quality input. Now I understand why there's only a handful of you and the payout could only garner pocket change.
Lol, there's a few hundred people who use the tag and we are planning on expanding. Your toxicity to everyone here and in these comments is not needed or wanted and I am going to downvote these bullshit rants you are having on my blog posts.
The have a nice swim comment was a follow up to my previous comment where I said:
Just wanted to clear that up as you are still convinced that we are ganging up on you and that we're all working together.
Again, whatever issue @informationwar has with you is nothing to do with @familyprotection.
You sir are a liar. Look at you, I have done nothing today but have to answer to your constant bombardment of crap aimed at me. You know what you have been doing long after I left this crap behind yesterday you still can't let it go, anybody with any common sense can see right through this. That's why you or someone you know within information wars threw the information war tag up on the article I was arguing about, that's the first time I've ever saw that tag on a FP article, funny how that just popped up there, not that I reply on all the stuff I read on that channel because it usually entails me to spend hours looking at the material and digging for the real truth....which you don't like, which is why you'd like to get rid of me, but the one's I have read I've never seen the IW tag on them....that's called bullying tactics, as in ganging up on someone, you and your cohort couldn't ban me so you decided to make life miserable for me today....well it didn't work out the way you thought did it. I don't need to rip people off, I don't need to be consumed with what's happening on FP today or what misguided advice they're giving to people, you guys aren't that important to me, you won't make me or break me, if I wasn't being forced to try and stop you from having me removed from the site and proving all your lies and deceit I'd be happily doing something else today, you'd be the last people I'd be thinking about....but don't think I won't show up again because I won't let you censor me.
Furthermore I see you left off my reply back to you concerning the comment above....my reply was that I did go the round about in nice way of trying to get her to critically think on a prior thread, since then her situation has deteriorated, sometimes when we are in crisis it's like those movies were someone slaps you across the face to get you to pull out of it, they are to blinded by the crisis to think critically, there's absolutely nothing wrong at all with someone critiquing the situation critically....it's way better than giving someone absurd legal advice that doesn't amount to a hill of beans, only pushes more confrontation between them and the social worker/police instead of focusing on the matter at hand, saving her children from being taken.