Francisco Gil White

Picture Credit

When I started reading Francisco Gil White I was impressed by his evidence-based look at geopolitics.
Instead of figuring out what people said and how that true was you just look at what their actions promoted.
He does a good job in breaking political systems into the two most important defining features their promotion of slavery or promotion of Liberty.
In his series psychological warfare and political grammar Francisco Gil White explores the establishment model and proposes his own alternative model.
his website historical and investigative research covers many topics.
The topic that I found most illuminating was the links between the German Nazis and the National Socialists of the Middle East.
When I say National Socialists I mean the Baath party Nasser of Egypt, I mean PLO Fatah.
I learned from Francisco Gil White about the the leader of the a Arabs of British mandate Palestine I learned how he organized Albanian Muslims into battalions to hunt down Serbs, Gypsies and Jews.
I learned how the grand Mufti of Jerusalem had organized the ethnic cleansing of Iraq's indigenous Jewish population.
He covers the connection between the grand Mufti of Jerusalem and Yasir Arafat.

Here's a quick overview of his series psychological warfare and political grammar

http://www.hirhome.com/political_grammar00.htm

█0. Introduction: The Iran deal, what does it teach us?
This series of articles is a primer. It contains selected historical knowledge minimally sufficient to abandon the ‘Establishment model’ of geopolitical processes and to begin constructing an alternative model that will explain and predict the world of international relations.
█ 1. Psychological warfare, communication research, and the media

PSYOPs originally refers to psychological warfare operations conducted by the military against the enemy. But PSYOPs have domestic applications as well. We review here historian Christopher Simpson’s documentation of how social science was corrupted in the United States so that power elites could bend ‘democracy’ to their will using psychological warfare.

█ 2. Political grammar: How does psychological warfare work?

Psychological warfare is governed by grammatical rules. Power elites with a good command of such rules can deploy psychological warfare to ‘manage’ citizens into doing things they otherwise wouldn’t—even into destroying their own liberties. We here explain the basic operation of Western political grammar, created in 1848, and how it may be manipulated.

█ 3. Principal-Agent Theory (PAT), the citizen, and the State

Principal-agent theory (PAT) examines how ‘principals’ can manipulate ‘agents’ to do their bidding. It has been applied to political behavior but, perhaps not too surprisingly, in such a manner that it will not challenge the perception that Western States are functioning democracies whose governments are duly responsive to the citizenries. Here we explore an alternative picture that takes into account what power elites can do through psychological (or political) warfare.

█ 4. Is US geopolitics meant to strengthen or weaken democracy?

The study of geopolitics is meant to account for the foreign policy behaviors of the various States. However, geopolitical scholars have certain taboos about which kinds of hypotheses may or may not be entertained. In particular, the prevailing political grammar in the Western media and academic system appears to rigorously forbid that anybody question the purity of intention of those making foreign policy decisions in Western states. Why?

█ 5. The goals of the US power elite in historical perspective

The US power elite’s most important players were responsible for setting up the US psychological warfare regime after World War II (Part 1). These same players had a major hand in precipitating the onset of World War II. This information is of some importance in evaluating the probable aims of US power-elite geopolitics today. But it is next to impossible to pursue this analysis because the US power elite role in causing World War II has been almost completely expunged from historical education.

█ 6. US postwar policy toward Nazi war criminals

Few people are aware that the US government recruited Nazis after WWII. And most of the aware believe this was just a handful of Nazi scientists employed in rocket development (Operation Paperclip). In fact, the US government shielded from justice a giant multitude of Nazis—including many war criminals who had bathed themselves in innocent blood—and used them to create the postwar US intelligence infrastructure. This affected both domestic and foreign policy. The self-imposed silence of the Western media on this topic is diagnostic of the psychological warfare regime that dominates.

█ 7. The aims of the US power elite in WWII

Certain important events surrounding the causes and aftermath of World War II may be recruited to defend a model of the US power elite as pro-Nazi. This model naturally needs to provide satisfactory special reasons for important behaviors of the same power elite that appear anti-Nazi. But the same applies to the Establishment model: it must provide satisfactory special reasons to explain why, if the US power elite has been anti-Nazi, it involved itself so intensely with sponsorship and then recruitment of Nazis. We examine these issues here.

█ 8. US foreign policy in the Arab-Israeli conflict

Given US power elite’s sponsorship of the eugenics movement, which became German Nazism, and the same US power elite’s creation of the postwar psychological warfare regime, it is reasonable to ask whether US postwar foreign policy has been consistent with the aims of the eugenicists and the German Nazis, namely, to destroy democracy and to kill Jews. That is the question we ask here.

█ 9. Why do enemies of democracy attack the Jews?

Shoa (‘the Holocaust’) was a horrific slaughter and a Crime Against Humanity, but it was not an historical aberration. As Western historical processes go, the mass-killing of Jews may be the most recurrent and stable. Those who killed the Jews in World War II were enemies of human liberty. This, too, is not new. In the history of the West, whenever the Jews are under attack, everybody’s liberties are in danger. What explains this? One simple fact: for 2500 years, Jewish thought has been the engine of Western political liberation, and Western enemies of liberty have always understood this.

█ 10. Grammatical Realism: Outline of a geopolitical approach

Geopolitical approaches fall into two broad traditions, classical and critical geopolitics. We situate the approach followed in this series, called grammatical realism, in the context of these two traditions in order to lay bare the methodological assumptions and its programmatic strategy. We make clear which aspects of classical geopolitics and critical geopolitics have been adopted and which discarded.

This is a video where he goes through some of his ideas and evidence for them

Why Professor Francisco Gil-White was fired: He defended the Nation of Israel and the Serbs (1/5)

This is Francisco Gil White's credentials

Francisco Gil-White (born July 1969) is a sociocultural anthropologist who teaches Organizational Behavior, Knowledge Management, and the Political History of the West and Antisemitism at ITAM (Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México), in Mexico City. He also teaches Systems and Evolutionary Thinking at Universidad del Medio Ambiente.

He was Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania from 2001 to 2006 and lecturer at the Solomon Asch Centre for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict. He was born in Chicago and raised in Mexico City. His father is Francisco Gil Díaz, Secretary of Finance and Public Credit in the cabinet of Vicente Fox. He holds a master's degree in Social Sciences from the University of Chicago and a PhD in Biological and Cultural Anthropology from UCLA.

Political activism

Gil-White was fired from the University of Pennsylvania.[2] Gil-White claims that this was a politically motivated dismissal, a consequence of his activism on topics such as his repudiation of the conventional version of the 1990s civil wars in Yugoslavia[3] and his claim that the Palestine Liberation Organisation traces its roots to Adolf Hitler's World War II Final Solution.[4] Gil-White has made public documents relevant to his dispute with the University of Pennsylvania,.[5][6] As a consequence of the protest registered by UPenn students in the context of his dismissal, on February 17, 2005, Gil-White appeared on Hannity and Colmes (Fox News Channel) in a segment on "how far academic freedom should go."
[Source}(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Gil-White)

Here is a short summary of His how he entered how he started hirhome.com and what moved him to pursue this line of research

How Historical and Investigative Research (HIR) came to be...

http://www.hirhome.com/bio.htm

---

SHORT SUMMARY

Historical and Investigative Research was created to make important documentation available to the general public, because the academic system is rife with politically biased censorship when it comes to examining the foreign policy of the United States.

Francisco Gil-White found out about this censorship the hard way, when, as a result of his discovery of the vastly important research done by Jared Israel and other journalists at Emperor's Clothes, he began investigating the official and media representation of the civil wars in the former Yugoslavia, and the relationship of the US government to terrorist forces in that country. Without ever complaining that Gil-White had made a single error of documentation, Gil-White's employer, the University of Pennsylvania psychology department, began harassing the young assistant professor, making it clear that it didn't want him doing this kind of research. But Gil-White ignored this and continued his work, casting his eye now also on the Arab-Israeli conflict, for there appeared to be some interesting similarities in the demonization of Serbs and Jews. In time, he published a documentation of PLO origins, showing that this organization traced its roots to the German Nazi Final Solution (the most complete documentation on this is here), which explained why it was chartered to exterminate the Israeli Jews.

After this, Gil-White was threatened with the loss of his job unless he ceased doing this kind of investigative work. Francisco Gil-White has now been fired from the University of Pennsylvania despite having an impressive record as both scientist and educator. Is this willful censorship? Well, the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States protects every American citizen's free speech, and the University of Pennsylvania Faculty Handbook explicitly stipulates that its professors have a right to free speech as US citizens. Moreover, this Faculty Handbook also explicitly stipulates that professors are protected in their academic freedom; in other words, a professor's freedom to investigate and publish anything he or she likes is protected by University of Pennsylvania statute. In addition, there is the fact that nobody has yet accused Francisco Gil-White of making even one error in his documentation, so there can hardly be scientific grounds for his dismissal.

So that the general public may see what the University of Pennsylvania, and the US Establishment more broadly, does not want people to know, Historical and Investigative Research will make this information available to the public. Below is the story and documentation of how Francisco Gil-White's struggle with the University of Pennsylvania made this website necessary.

---

This man is one of my favourite Academics( Not always a dirty word)