If you wish for people to listen to your perspective on a subject, then you're going about it in an extremely supercilious and dysfunctional way here. So much so, that you missed the fact that nothing @zyx066 has said here really contradicts what you have apophantically stated. What you've done is merely added to the conversation.
I started watching this video, but I must admit that when someone starts by saying that money is likely to have existed for tens of thousands of years, ie. before the agricultural revolution, they clearly haven't researched the history of money very astutely. It's not that old.
What he is stating regarding Nixon's policy being passed in 1970, however, is fascinating, but the cogs of what initiated that control of money in 1970 goes much farther back than that date. (the establishment of reserve banks for example)
It's a good video to share though, so thanks for that.
The main problem that the monetary system is the primary cause of, cannot be solved when people on the same side of understanding deride each other, so my suggestion to you is to make an effort to respect the person you intend to debate with as an equal.
If you elevate your own status then you become as much a part of the problem as the system itself because at the heart of a supercilious disposition is intransigence and that acts as an obstacle to progressive solution-based thinking.
We need to open our hearts and our minds to find some kind of coadunation or unity if we are to dissintigrate or positively transform the rigid structure that has a stranglehold on us here on Earth at the moment.