Don't Blame, But Reclaim Government

in #informationwar6 years ago

What I'll try to do tonight is explain to myself, and hopefully to some of you, what economy is. That's it; what is it? And what does it have to do with politics?


economy.jpg
Image by Nick Youngson - source: Picpedia

Everybody has an opinion about "the economy", but what do we really know about it. We know it's important to have money, because bills have to be paid and mouths have to be fed. And we know that it's the economy that enables us to earn money; we have to work for an employer or we have to make a profit in an undertaking of our own. A profitable one of course. That's the other thing we know about the economy: it runs on profits. Other ways to say this is that it runs on growth, or on the accumulation of capital, and that capital is owned privately. Privately owned businesses produce goods and sell them at a profit, and from that profit pay the laborers and invest in the future of the business.

This is how we understand the economy, but it's not what economy is. This is capitalism, the only surviving economic ideology after the opposing ideology died in the late 1980s. Communism or socialism also is not what economy is. These are all ideologies, capitalism included. One ideology takes as it's core the community or society, with a central role for the government, and the other takes as it's core the individual with a minimal role for the government. Very roughly speaking. But none of them are economy.

I often find it enlightening and liberating to try to explain the world by myself for myself. Well as far as that's possible of course, because while explaining stuff to myself, I carry with me the knowledge I've gained from interacting with thousands of souls from past and present, through conversations, school, books, movies, music and so on; whatever explanation comes out of me about anything at all, is colored and given to me by uncountable others.

This is the first and overarching reality I take with me in any attempt at explaining human, social or cultural affairs. We're all the sum total of all our experiences in an environment created by a myriad of individuals who all in some way became part of us. And now, in 2018, we're as interconnected and interdependent as we've never been before. We all stand on the shoulders of giants and these giants are the combined efforts of millions of souls, not just the ones that rose to notoriety. Without taking anything away from the unique and sovereign individual each of us is, our interconnectedness and interdependence is an important reality to consider when attempting to explain or contemplate "the state of humankind".

It may seem arrogant to even think that one unqualified person like myself could have anything sensible, important or desirable to say about such complicated matters, but I feel we all should take some time to consider the larger questions in life, especially in times like these.


Internet_map_Global_Brain.jpg
Opte Project visualization of routing paths through a portion of the Internet. The connections and pathways of the internet could be seen as the pathways of neurons and synapses in a global brain
source: Wikipedia


So what is economy. Without turning to a dictionary, Wikipedia or some famous writer or philosopher it's hard to come up with a good description of the word. I have thought about this a lot and what I've come up with is that economy is simply the answer to a question, a human need. The question is this: "how do we divide among ourselves that which we produce together from that which the planet gives to us?" That's it really. We live on a planet and we produce all we need to make a better life together and have come up with a system of rules and customs to decide who gets how much of what we produce.

And let me again stress the "togetherness" in all of this. What should be clear to all of us is that alone we are literally nothing, worth nothing. The individuality of our being, the individuality we all cherish so much in our self as well as in each other, is given to us for the most part. That doesn't de-valuate that individuality in the slightest, it makes it even more precious in my opinion, in my reality ;-) To illustrate how little you would have were you truly independent, imagine an island with everything the planet has to offer in sheer abundance.

And you have that island all to yourself. All the gold, diamond, water, food, living meat, irons, rare metals... everything you'd need to build yourself a nice villa with a car parked in front, a swimming pool, the works. You'd never get it. You'd die owning a wooden cabin, a vegetable garden and some spears made from wood and stone. Everything you own now that's more than that is because of billions of individuals who in their own way led us here where we are now. This is the non-economical reality of humanity's efforts.

If economy is simply supposed to be a system that decides who gets what share of the collective fruits of our labor, the question becomes if we do a good job at the moment. I'd say we don't. And it's the popular thing to blame the failing of the economy on the political part of the system that takes care of dividing the fruits of our labor. In almost all online discussions I hear or read, politics are blamed for the economically induced woes of many citizens worldwide, in the third world of course, but also more and more in modern western democracies.

For decades now the middle class in these democracies have been under siege. The working classes of these countries have seen their productivity rise through the years, have seen profits increase, seen the CEO's and other top managers' salaries and bonuses skyrocket, but have almost never seen their share of the increased growth. On the contrary. My father was able to take care of a family of four with a factory job when we just came to the Netherlands in 1971. We had a car, rented a nice house, went to school my sister and I, had a vacation abroad like Spain or Italy almost every year. From that one factory job.


Percent-Boom-Stock-Exchange.jpg
source: Maxpixel

Now, almost fifty years later things are quite different and the changes weren't positive. Technology has advanced, yes. Our lives are made easier in some aspects, yes. And we still collectively produce these goods and services that are supposed to make our lives better. Make our lives better. But economy has failed us. The working class is steadily transformed into a class of "the working poor". And all this time it has been the case that in almost all western democracies the governments have been serving the needs of businesses and corporations. The developments toward the liberation of capital and the serving of capitalist interests started some years before Reagan and Thatcher made popular the expression "government isn't the solution; government is the problem."

It should be clear to all of us that in an economy based on individual profits gained from individual labor and individually owned capital, not everyone in society will be able to make a living. Set aside any instinctual hatred you might harbor against those lazy leeches that want to do nothing and only pray upon someone else's fruits, and consider this sober fact. The elderly, the injured, the disabled, the kids and all those countless people who are in themselves valuable to society, but aren't able to monetize that value because it falls outside marketable items or services. Keep strongly in mind that most poor people, working or not, don't choose to be poor. Some of them do, most don't.

If you accept that the distribution of the wealth, increased by higher production, has been unfair, that the middle class has been paying for the income gains at the top, that working people have to work more for less pay, that production of goods is being shipped to low wage, low regulation countries, that young people have to start their professional careers by paying off an enormous debt because education has to pay itself to. When fifty years ago everything was so much more equal. We had capitalism then too you know. Only it was before we were made to believe that "government is the problem." If you accept all that, is government the real problem?

The decades following Reagan and Thatcher are all marked by the increase in economical and financial power at the expense of political power. This has lead to the globalization of capital, making it free to go on the hunt for increased profits in a global marketplace instead of a local or national marketplace. It has freed up the war-industry to wage war against a tactic, "terrorism" is a tactic, not a country or a people, and hence this war has been made a perpetual one. It's been 17 years now since the start of the renewed destruction of the middle east. And the western middle classes pay for these wars with no end in sight, not only with money, but also by sending their young ones to fight and die in these highly lucrative endeavors.

The politics you're rightly so angry about are the politics dictated by multinational mega corporations that were made in an ever freer marketplace for capital to flow from one hand to another, even at the other end of the world. When political power serves the needs of capital growth, increased income inequality is what you reap. We're not completely there yet, but all over in the western world citizens are acting out on the belief that "government is the problem," and increasingly vote for politicians that favor nationalism, closed borders and so on because they truly are convinced that politics has screwed over their lives. Much of these same people blame politics for their worsening financial status.


962px-One_Percent_Rule_fr.jpg
Is this how we justify the existence of the 1%?
source: Wikimedia Commons


But if you take into account that politicians have given capital more and more freedom, that they've done nothing for the middle class and everything to make the economy grow while keeping wages down, is it really politics that's the problem? Haven't we been giving away our democratic power to politics and politicians that serve the economy first instead of the people that elected them? And aren't it the owners of the production facilities that are abandoning the working class for a cheaper, more profitable working class abroad? I mean is this really a time to blame politics for the problems that are so evidently caused by the world's largest financial players? I have a fun question for all of you: try and find out in how many governments worldwide ex Goldman Sachs managers have served and are serving. Read this for fun: 26 Goldman Sachs Alumni Who Run the World.

If economy is the system by which we decide who gets what share of our collective efforts, politics just can't be excluded. Not if the mechanics of the economic model alone breeds severe inequality and if we want to do justice to the facts I described earlier. The facts that indicate that there's not only an individually motivated sense of our worth to society or the economy. The human effort to produce goods from the earths resources is a highly collaborative one that's made us highly interdependent on a global scale. This reality of interconnectedness and interdependence is not represented anywhere in the economical model. Nor is there a provision of what to do with the reality that more and more jobs will be automated. What do we do when the model of production for individual material profits fails to do what we think it can do?

In my opinion it's not that government exists or that it has too much power. I think it's the opposite because we now deal with the legacy of successive governments that have given away more and more of it's power to regulate the economy to the owners of capital. Governments have betrayed the middle class they themselves so carefully nurtured in years long past, by fighting against the excesses and extreme inequality that capitalism by itself naturally produces. There is no invisible hand. Government used to be the democratically elected institute that protected our freedom from the oppression of economical powers. Who do you think fought for the 8 hour work day, labor rights, the abolishing of slavery and child labor? The industrialists themselves? No, that was us, from the bottom up fighting against the wants and needs of the industrialists. And we used to have politicians that would do that work for us.

But economical powers have installed political leaders that day in day out make us believe that "government is the problem". When in a democracy the government is supposed to work for us, that makes us the problem. We killed democracy ourselves by buying in to the lies sold to us by our smartest sales-persons. That they used the mouths of paid for politicians doesn't change that. It is still us that give them that power. And the solution is not to blame government but to reclaim government. "Taxes" has never been a dirty word in times when it worked for the middle class. In times when big business was still a regional or national affair politics and business alike worked at least in part for the benefit of the entire community, by maintaining a strong middle class that simply wouldn't exist if there wasn't some redistribution of capital income through taxation of the richest among us. Remember that island! No individual can rightly claim all they own is from their efforts alone. Not one. And none need to own a country.

But now that the richest among us have bought the democracy, they cleverly make us, the 90%, blame each other and government. We have given them the power to buy our government by voting in politicians that play their game. And now we vote for politicians that claim to understand our mistrust in government and that they will "drain the swamp", while also cashing in on the fear for strangers that will make it even harder to make a living because jobs are hard to get as it is. It's so sad when you realize that these same economical powers fight the wars that cause so many to flee their homelands and seek refuge in the west.


rip_middle_class.jpg
Middle Class RIP
Image by DonkeyHotey - source: Flickr


So now that the profit and growth based economy has gone global, and given that economical giants have been given more and more freedom by governments that did their bidding, do you think that government should just disappear and let free markets decide who gets what share of the collectively produced growth? Do you trust that everyone that deserves to live will be able to make a living in a world where every square inch of land is privately owned? Or do you believe government should be by the people and for the people and play a role in the distribution of the fruits of our labor? Should capitalism decide by itself or should democracy have a say?

I'll stop here. If you've made it this far, I am grateful. It's just that I see societies falling apart and divisions between a manufactured left and right become sharper. I see societies polarizing and nationalism being celebrated almost everywhere I look. And almost nowhere do I see the anger directed at the financial top, but at the politics they enact through their bought governments and politicians. We let them divide us in left and right camps when both serve the same economical powers. I wish that would stop, that we would see through all of it and reclaim, instead of blame government.

Thanks for reading. I'll be back tomorrow and I hope this hasn't scared you into not returning then; I promise it'll be shorter ;-) Until then, keep informed and keep steeming!


wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Great News & Random Ramblings
Steemit Is A Party!The Evolution Of Whales
Left And Right: Capitalism's Split PersonalityThe Kakistocracy Explained
Inverted TotalitarianismQuantum Consciousness?

wave-13 divider odrau steem
Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!
Helpienaut_post_banner_02-01.png

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

wave-13 divider odrau steem
Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO

Sort:  

Sorry... while I upvoted you based upon effort, this is mostly nonsense. You're suffering from what's called in sociological circles a mental state known as "reification". Shifting labels around (between government and corporation particularly) doesn't change the reality that we are dominated by a class of parasites who take an ever increasing slice of the global GDP. When fascism (corporate government) begins to blend in, these distinctions no longer matter. You're basically left with a gang of thugs who demand obedience using paper first and use scare tactics (terrorism for example) as an excuse to remain in control ultimately leading to gun violence by badge wearers for failure to comply.

The problem is that you haven't traced back the massive theft into the 10s of trillions of USD responsible for the current "political" situation known euphemistically as QE (quantative easing) - note the message in the genesis block in the section "Raw Block Data". This is the reason for bitcoin's existence and is the antidote to our current political problems. You tried to define what the "economy" is. Well I submit to you that since 1970, money has become a system of control and the "economy" is the state of that control. These next 17 minutes of your life will open your eyes if you're open to it...

Thanks so much for reading and responding @zoidsoft, I appreciate that :-) And I'll upvote this based on effort alone ;-)

Seriously though, you say basically nothing I haven't said in my post, so I'm confused.

You're basically left with a gang of thugs who demand obedience using paper first and use scare tactics (terrorism for example) as an excuse to remain in control ultimately leading to gun violence by badge wearers for failure to comply.

That's exactly right. I watched the first few minutes of the video, but I know that one already, and it's a good one. Again: no dispute there. The "gang of thugs" that turned money into a means of control instead of a means of exchange however, is spawned by politics run by plutocrats. That gang is the result of letting bankers and manufacturers buy the democracy with money they "earned" in an ever bigger marketplace they created for themselves. The thugs, the parasites, are the 1%.

This is what Antonopoulos meant by describing crypto as a way of "exiting" the economy ruled by money-power, as the alternative choice to further trying to heal the corrupted fiat-system. What I say is that we've given up too soon on the real-world economy and the real-world politics. We've given up on democracy itself by doing that. Now, you can do that if you truly believe that capitalism by itself can make politics obsolete. That the free exchange of goods and services on an open market in a society of people has some sort of self-regulatory aspect to it that prevents the rise of a plutocracy. Democracy is meant to do that. So we can get rid of politics and stay relatively free, if you believe in a system of voting with dollars. I don't. Not when person A has billions of votes and person B doesn't even have one vote.

Loading...

Democracy is meant to do that. So we can get rid of politics and stay relatively free, if you believe in a system of voting with dollars. I don't. Not when person A has billions of votes and person B doesn't even have one vote.

I can see that my way of thinking is extremely alien to you because you're not even close to interpreting what I said. I don't believe in voting at all and you should not be voting with dollars or any other currency either (except in the sense of exiting the system). Democracy is an evil system. It basically says to every participant that you must all have your tails tied together and to the victor of the cat fight goes the spoils. That's why parasites like it because there is always a loser and the eventual loss of sovereignty and financial control that they can scrape up for themselves after the dust settles is in the form of massive profits.

What ever happened to letting everyone live in their own way as long as you're not hurting anyone else? Why should I be forced to live under anyone elses rules? Forget to wear your seat belt? Give $100 USD to the state. Who was the victim? Nobody except myself for failing to "protect" myself. This is just illegitimate BS. If there is no victim, there is no crime.

If you want to vote on something, then it must be opt-in first otherwise everything that comes after that is illegitimate decree. You can't force someone to participate in a vote and make it binding without massive violation of moral and ethical principles.

Thanks @zoidsoft, you've made everything clear now. And to be honest, I knew it would boil down to you being another one of the many, many variations of anarchists that are drawn to the crypto space. And boy, do I respect you for your passionate wish for more freedom. That's what makes this so frustrating: I love your goals and I fully agree with your analysis of how we got where we are now. At least where it comes to explaining how government has been hijacked by the "money-power".

However, there's a good reason why I started with setting aside the dictionary and Wikipedia. I one takes a few minutes even to think about things in a fundamental way, that is explain for yourself what every word means when we talk about economy and politics, you quickly see, or at least I quickly see that the kind of freedom the voluntarist wishes for is simply a mission impossible. It will only worsen the problems of our current economic model.

And you're right: the voluntarist, the anarchist viewpoint is alien to me. Wich means my viewpoint is probably just as alien to you ;-) Here's how I see it: the lesson we learned is not that centralization is by definition a bad thing. The lesson we learned is not that it's bad by definition that leaders and followers exist; that lies at the heart of our biology and instincts. The lesson is not that freedom is always a good thing. Try and exchange the word "freedom" with "co-existing", and you'll get a sense of what I think freedom really is. Freedom is not something any individual can obtain, freedom is always found in and granted by the community of people you're part of. And lately we've learned that Dapps and smart contracts do not protect us from basic human behavior; "-isms" aren't programmable.

And that's just it: voluntarism is just another -ism, built on the same dodgy foundation we've conjured up since we started producing more than we need. A funny thing happened back then: we started overproducing but kept the scarcity mindset. We live now in times of hyper-materialism and social hyper-atomization. If there's anything we don't need right now, it is another -ism that further accelerates the evolution toward a world where every individual is an island on its own. The extent to which this hyper-individualistic mindset is evolved in the anarchist mindset is so clear in my mind when you say, not just you but anarchists in general, that you "own" your body. That's alien to me. I am me, I don't own me, there's no contract involved when it comes to defining who or what is "me".

Freedom and capitalism, markets, trading, are ultimately incompatible. This starts with that alien concept of ownership. What does it mean to own something? Ownership is a legal construct, thought up by owners. But it's a legal construct and there freedom is lost immediately. When "worth" is measured by material ownership, there's no way on earth to have real equal opportunity without a totalitarian government. This is the phantom of that other -ism. Both are doomed to fail and none is preferable.

Freedom and some measure of equality of opportunity is obtainable in one way only: discussion. And that is what "democracy" basically means. We discuss before we act. And we decide by majority vote. And we have a constitution to protect the ones left behind by those decisions. That's it. Starting with the basic truth that an individual is literally worth nothing, and that all we've ever achieved we've achieved by intense collaboration (and not competition, don't even get me started on that one...), a democracy is the best guarantee for maximal freedom for the maximum number of individuals.

It's difficult, I know; no one said a functional democracy is a simple thing to do. And yes, we'll have to accept that things won't always go our way, which is also a simple basic fact of life. It's too bad that none of us has experience with true democracy, without the machinations of ownership and owners that constantly try to maximize their material wealth. Freedom is incompatible with that basic mindset. Not all human interactions are voluntary. Some just are. Freedom lies in the acceptance of that basic fact.

We're miles apart, my friend, where it comes to the means by which we want to achieve a mutually shared goal :-) But I do truly appreciate you discussing this with me. And I know I'm the extremist here; your viewpoint has a lot of support in the cryptoverse ;-) And I'm also glad that we can both agree that the current status quo should be fought in a peaceful way, so yes, "exit" the fiat economy might well be the best course of action for the moment; that's why we're both here I suppose. And who knows, I might be wrong on all of this and be pleasantly surprised when voluntarism takes over. Thanks again for your generous responses @zoidsoft :-)

Loading...

If you wish for people to listen to your perspective on a subject, then you're going about it in an extremely supercilious and dysfunctional way here. So much so, that you missed the fact that nothing @zyx066 has said here really contradicts what you have apophantically stated. What you've done is merely added to the conversation.
I started watching this video, but I must admit that when someone starts by saying that money is likely to have existed for tens of thousands of years, ie. before the agricultural revolution, they clearly haven't researched the history of money very astutely. It's not that old.
What he is stating regarding Nixon's policy being passed in 1970, however, is fascinating, but the cogs of what initiated that control of money in 1970 goes much farther back than that date. (the establishment of reserve banks for example)
It's a good video to share though, so thanks for that.
The main problem that the monetary system is the primary cause of, cannot be solved when people on the same side of understanding deride each other, so my suggestion to you is to make an effort to respect the person you intend to debate with as an equal.
If you elevate your own status then you become as much a part of the problem as the system itself because at the heart of a supercilious disposition is intransigence and that acts as an obstacle to progressive solution-based thinking.
We need to open our hearts and our minds to find some kind of coadunation or unity if we are to dissintigrate or positively transform the rigid structure that has a stranglehold on us here on Earth at the moment.


Blissful blessings and smiles

in joy

Nathan

NK

If you wish for people to listen to your perspective on a subject, then you're going about it in an extremely supercilious and dysfunctional way here.

I apologize if it seems supercilous, but I'm doing everything I can to be as exact as possible. I don't exempt myself from the very same brainwashing that @zyx066 and all the rest of us have suffered from. I didn't fully "get it" until just last year and I'm retirement age. It's taken me several years of retraining my mind against the indoctrination of the state and I still occasionally catch myself screwing up. It's really that insidious!

So much so, that you missed the fact that nothing @zyx066 has said here really contradicts what you have apophantically stated. What you've done is merely added to the conversation.

I'll have to disagree here. I didn't have enough time to show where I was in disagreement, but that has since been explained more thoroughly above.

That is so well said Nathan, can't agree more!

Posted using Partiko Android

I second that motion!

;-)

Thanks, @bubke, for stopping by and the support :-)

You're such a well of wisdom, my friend, thanks! <3

Hi @zyx066!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 2.739 which ranks you at #12856 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 5 places in the last three days (old rank 12861).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 373 contributions, your post is ranked at #188.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Only a few people are following you, try to convince more people with good work.
  • The readers like your work!
  • You have already shown user engagement, try to improve it further.

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.030
BTC 65317.17
ETH 2646.03
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.86