Clear Evidence of Collusion

in #informationwar3 years ago (edited)

Image Source

List of Evidence for Collusion

Exhibit #1:

Donald Trump was paid $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow. Or was that was Bill Clinton?

When former President Bill Clinton received a $500,000 check from a Kremlin-linked bank in 2010 to give a speech in Moscow it served, to the FBI, as further evidence the Russians had unleashed an influence campaign designed to get access to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Source

Image Source

Exhibit #2:

Donald Trump failed to disclose Russian Russian donors to the Trump Foundation before running for president. Or was that HILLARY Clinton failing to disclose Russian donors to the Clinton Foundation before running for president?

The Clinton Foundation failed to report $20 million in donations from governments to the Internal Revenue Service, newly refiled tax returns show. Reuters reported that the foundation disclosed the $20 million it received from governments, most of them foreign, between 2010 and 2013 when it and a spin-off organization refiled tax returns from six years to fix errors. Source

Image Source

Exhibit #3:

Trump was a business partner with the Russian government. His company received $1 Billion Rubles ($45,000,000) from Russia. Oh, no wait, that was John Podesta.

Podesta has “a very interesting relationship with Russia, going back to when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.” “In 2011, he joins the executive board of this small energy company in Massachusetts called Joule Energy,” Schweizer told SiriusXM. “And Joule Energy, about two months after he joins the executive board, gets a large infusion of cash. They get one billion rubles, which is about $35 to $45 million, invested from Russia. It comes from a very unusual entity, this entity called RUSNANO.” Source

Image Source

Exhibit #4:

Remember the time Trump scored $145 million from shareholders of a company that was sold to the Russians? Oh no, wait... that was HILLARY Clinton again.

The Clinton Foundation took in some $145 million in contributions from Uranium One shareholders, much of it coming at about the time that deal won approval from CFIUS — the investment panel on which both Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder conveniently sat. Is that a coincidence? Or that the Justice Department waited until 2014, the year after Hillary left office, to take any action in the Russian criminal matters? Or that details of the Uranium One deal didn't come out until 2015, the year Eric Holder left office? Was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's "reset" with the Russian government in 2009 just part of a wider plan to enrich her own family foundation with Russian cash? Source

Image Source

Exhibit #5:

Remember the time that President Trump gave $150 Billion in oil revenue relief to a terrorist state and a sworn enemy of the United States. Then later shipped pallets full of small denomination unmarked bills to the same terrorist state and sworn enemy. Or was that Barrack Obama?

The United States, the European Union and the U.N. Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran to pressure it to stop its nuclear program. These include restrictions on trade, and the seizure in foreign bank accounts of $150 billion of Iranian oil revenue. Source

Image Source

Exhibit #6:

President Trump said it is appropriate to allow those under investigation to destroy evidence taking a hammer to cell phones and laptop hard drives. Oh, no wait, that was James Comey.

JAMES COMEY: Yeah. There was evidence that old Blackberries, after she was finished with them, they destroyed them, which I think a fair number of people do to make sure that if it’s resold, someone doesn’t end up with your information. And that after they produced information back to the d— to the Department of State, they used— a software program to clean the server to make sure there was nothing on it, or clean laptops to make sure there’s nothing on them.


Image Source

Exhibit #7:

Remember that time President Trump destroyed subpoenaed evidence by Congress and the FBI? Oh, no wait, that was Hillary Clinton.

There's no doubt that Clinton intended to destroy her email archives after choosing which ones to send to the State Department. That's what Mills' December 2014 directive was apparently intended to do. Given that the Benghazi investigation was well under way and there had been multiple document requests and production agreements, the effect of Mills' directive, had it been carried out at the time she sent it, would have been to destroy the evidence that had not been handed over to the State Department before anyone knew to ask for it Source

Image Source

Exhibit #8:

Donald Trump approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium to the Russians? Oh, no wait... that was HILLARY Clinton.

The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply. Source

Image Source

I think I have offered sufficient evidence...

Trump is literally Hitler. :-)

Benjamin Turner: God fearer. Rooted in Messiah. Husband of @lturner. Father of four wonderful children. The guy behind the camera. Steemit enthusiast.

Bless the Most High!

Have you been introduced to Menē yet?

Menē (Meen-nay) is a 24K gold and platinum investment jewelry company, where investors can trade their crypto-currencies for certified gold and platinum items. Preserve your wealth in precious metals and begin your Menē collection today.

Receive a $5.00 Gift Certificate using the link below:



This reminds me of the Family Guy episode where Peter is talking to Jake and Maggie Gylenhall. While their bickering at eachother, he stops them and says "your'e both just awful!" The whole right left paradigm in a nutshell.

Its often the case that evil people accuse good people of exactly the evils that they have been themselves committing. They have no imagination and thus just project their own behaviour onto their enemies.

You made your point. Will someone refute you?

While I was sourcing this, It was shocking how many lame attempts I saw by the MSM to 'soften' this information so it doesn't look as bad as it is. @ironshield

Psychopaths are not creative.
Thus, it appears that their typical MO is to blame their opponent for what they are doing.
Maybe we should look deeply into all the accusations Hitlery made last election...

I think a lot of it is Psychological Projection. The best way for a criminal to feel safe from getting caught is get close to the investigators (in this case set up the investigation) and point it in the direction of your opponent, charging them with the crime they committed. Then it's settled in their mind, their opponent is the criminal, not them. @ironshield

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

@ironshield with all due respect. (a lot of respect)..

The real evidence of collusion never occured on US soil. Sadly, it was detailed in Panama papers. Whereas, Trump, Tillerson and much of his early staff pooled money in offshore accounts. Also, had some "whale" foreign investors (did I say investors I mean, gift givers). Sadly, many have long forgotten this simple fact as attention spans are minute.

Collusion also occured on account of oversight. Why individuals continued to use voting machines produced and assembled by our "enemies" is beyond me. There has been numerous evidence of this, yet nobody took action. Soros also tried to capitalize on this fact, yet obviously failed.

Thank you @ihashblox. If you have any source material to contribute, I'd be happy to investigate. @ironshield

Trump had no vested interest outside of leasing/licensing his name and servicing to the Trump Ocean Club International Hotel & Tower in Panama. The way Trump makes money is that he sells his brand name, that brand name comes with more than just his name plastered on the outside. To maintain the integrity of his name he requires the hotels to use his brand of products to service the hotels, which are high end products. The appearance of his name in the Panama documents so many times is because of that reason. He himself owned a condo at one time in the building which he sold, that doesn't make it a sell hidden under a shell is sort of minuscule to even consider. Now as far as high end players, yes he knows a lot of them but association among the rich is just that, association, you are not guilty of something just by knowing other rich people, it's some of those other rich people who appear in the papers that were involved in the off shore shell accounts, some possibly buying and selling condo's in the Trump hotel there to conceal or launder money but remember Trump doesn't own the hotel, he doesn't sell the condos, just his name and servicing. That's why his name appears so many times in the papers because a lot of these people were accused of conducting business by hiding and concealing under condos in a hotel which licensed the use of his name.

Well... I strongly disagree once again @sunlit7

Trump, Tillerson, Koch Bros, Adellman, etc and much more all hid fiat along with the likes of Friends and close families of Putin. British PM, Syrian leaders, Saudi Leaders, former Iraqi leaders.. etc etc

This was not do to a real estate sale which mind you would still be taxed here in US and therefore visible on the declaration -UCC filings and 1099OID. But its not. They honestly pooled money and promises offshore knowing that jurisidiction of US cannot reach them. Again nothing to do with as you mentioned. Hillary and Podesta did the same thing.

They pooled their campaign funds and more offshores. Donald even told you this in a round about way during campaign. "Its time to close the offshore accounts. (Paraphrased)" This is serious stuff. But again this took place outside of US (federal jurisdiction). So technically, @ironshield is correct, if this is all Mueller has, is anyone going to hold executive branch accountable for wasted funds?

Even that article says "surrounding Trump"..... like I said guilt by association is not a crime. Here's a link that uses the same people/reporters stated in your article, The International Consortium of Investigative the stories first folds out some "Trumps" aren't Trump....they are properties.

Let's not forget the real collusion with Israel. It was Mossad that dropped HRC for Trump, and for good reason: Trump is more subtle, and less likely to lead straight to them with a trail of dead bodies and corruption.

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

I really am starting to wonder if there is anyone actually on 'their' side.

Is this whole psi op involving a few hundred corrupt government officials, the MSM, and the banks..

No sane person can look at the evidence and come to any conclusion other than the beleedin' obvious...


Makes my head spin. It's hard to believe there are actually people that fail to see this.


Spot on. People seem to have this hard on for impeaching president Trump and proclaiming Russian collusion, and yet almost three years on from the 2016 election Donald Trump is still standing in office. The Clinton family have a well documented history of criminal actions, unexplained large donations, a suspicious foundation, suspicious meetings.

The real collusion here is a corrupt family that has bought its way into American politics and the mainstream media.

It's like a child caught eating the ice cream at night, pointing the dripping spoon at daddy saying "ICECREAM EATER!" @ironshield

After reading all that, there is only one thing left to say. Hillary Clinton does not look good in a ponytail!

Maybe it's more of a DONKEY tail in this case. LOL. @ironshield

haha! this was pretty darn clever sir ironshield. And you could keep going and going and going on the corruption!

Yes, eight pieces of evidence is the very short list. @ironshield

howdy ironshield! yes sir I agree but that was the perfect length of post so it worked great.

Hahahaha... Flipping brilliant. 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

Thank you very much, that's high praise! Please no f-bombs, my friend. @ironshield

I do love how mainstream media will twist so called facts to suit its agenda. No more f-bombs

giphy (51).gif
You just got splashed by @rewards-pool. For more information on delegating to the @rewards-pool click the following link.
@rewards-pool where a small delegation can get you a big splash.

Congratulations @ironshield! You have completed the following achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Thank you for your continued support of SteemSilverGold