Exposing I.D fraud part 1. Principal Agent Relationships / Is the State the principal?

Have you ever wondered about the Principal Agent relationship? What is it? Does the agent have liability for acts committed on behalf of the Principal or does the Principal have the duty to be liable for the act of an agent?In reading Bouvier's Law Dictionary one can see that as far as responsibility is concerned the Principal is decidedly in the Superior position. However the agent also has some advantages in the performance as an agent. In looking at these question one of the things that you will find is that there isn't within the Law dictionary's a one stop find all the information. For instance in looking at the principal agent relationship one will not discover that a document issued by the principal to the agent is actually proof that the agent is not financially responsible for the cost in acting as the agent for the principal.

Such however is implied by sources 

Might this be because what is really going on is slavery is being hidden within the very structure of the Law Dictionary's? Are all these terms in the law dictionary's designed specifically to hide a slave master relationship? Principal being master and agent being slave? Only if when the agent acts within his assigned by the Principals direction is he fully indemnified by the Principal can the question be answered as a no.

 Thus we comprehend that the Issuer of an Identifying document is the principal and the agent who carries the document is identified as the agent. One can say that according to the relationship the Principal is financially responsible for the agents conduct while acting under the Principals directions. Thus if you are required to Identify your self as an agent you are doing so as an agent and are not responsible for the cost of identifying your self as an agent however that cost comes about.  Thus it is important to find out what the law dictionary's actually say so as to be able to also identify the conditions under which  you are acting under the direction of the principal vs under your own liability.  Now it is important that one understand that they have several definitions for Principal. Personally I think this is purposefully to obfuscate the facts from the agents comprehension. Contract Principal is different from criminal principal and so one must be careful to comprehend the difference.  

Does this mean if you are an agent and are issued a document designed to identify you as an agent are you indemnified when you act as per direction. Supposedly yes. If it doesn't happen that way then the law dictionary's are being used to enslave and how they are doing it is by creating euphemism with the terms in the dictionary? These are in my opinion good question to be asking yourself as we investigate the terms Principal versus Agent? So to me only if every action that is expressed in the law dictionary's is fully and completely fore filled can the terms be denied euphemistic status as a fraud?

The funny thing about this is any time you are asked for an I.D the production of it is under the direction of the Principal.

Supposedly making the Principal responsible for any cost incurred by the production of the I.D. Will they meaning the Judges and the Bailiffs see it that way? I doubt it seriously. This to me should serve as the reason why I have not used the word understand in interpreting as best as I may the dictionary terms as supplied. 

It is important that I disclose to you that in copy and pasting from the PDF Bouvier's law Dictionary that the data isn't transferred as written in the dictionary and it takes a lot of effort to make it readable. 

So the following disclaimer applies.

 You the reader of this post on steemit.com are responsible for what you think and how you act as a result of reading this post. I am not responsible in any way and the reading of this document in part or in full is agreement of this disclaimer in full You the reader are responsible to get a copy to confirm for yourself what Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition actually reads. I am not a lawyer and am not giving legal advice: for discussion purposes only. The supplied source for Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 does not transfer liability in any way shape or from. 

Source : https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/books-pdf 

Click the above link and go to the source. On the sources web page hover over the Education tab, on the drop down menu go to "books", on the slide over menu go to "books" and click. After the page loads find Boviers Law 1856 and down load the PDF.

What is the (contract) principal defined as According to  Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition page 114-116 

PRINCIPAL, contracts. One who, being competent to contract, and who is sui juris, employs another to do any act for his own benefit, or on his own account. 2. As a general rule, it may be said, that every person, sui juris, is capable of being a principal, for in all cases where a man has power as owner, or in his own right to do anything, he may do it by another. 16 John. 86; 9 Co. 75; Com. Dig. Attorney, C 1; Heinec. ad Pand. P. 1, lib. 3, tit. 424.

3. Married women, and persons who are deprived of understanding, as idiots, lunatics, and others, not sui juris, are wholly incapable of entering into any contract, and, consequently, cannot appoint an agent.

Infants and married women are generally, incapable but, under special circumstances, they may make such appointments. For instance, an infant may make an attorney, when it is for his benefit; but lie cannot enter into any contract which is to Iiis prejudice. Com. Dig. Enfant, C 2; Perk. 13; 9 Co. 75; 3 Burr. 1804. A married woman cannot, in general, appoint an agent or attorney, and when it is requisite that one should be appointed, the hushand generally appoints for both. Perhaps for her separate property she may, with her hushand, appoint an agent or attorney; Cro. Car. 165,; 2 Leon. 200; 2 Buls. R. 13; but this seems to be doubted. Cro. Jac. 617; Yelv. 1; 1 Brownl. 134; 2 Brownl. 248; Adams' Ej. 174; Runn. Ej. 148.

4. A principal has rights which he can enforce, and is liable to obligations which he must perform. These will be briefly considered: 1. The rights to which principals are entitled arise from obligations due to them by their agents, or by third persons.

5. - 1st. The rights against their agents, are, 1. To call them to an account at all times, in relation to the business of their agency. 2. When the agent violates his obligations to his principal, either by exceeding his authority, or by positive misconduct, or by mere negligence or omissions in the discharge of the functions of his agency, or in any other manner, and any loss or damage falls on his principal, the latter will be entitled to full indemnity. Paley on Ag. by Lloyd, 7, 71, 74, and note 2 12 Pick. 328; 1 B. & Adolph. 415; 1 Liverm. Ag. 398. 3. The principal has a right to supersede his agent, where each may maintain a suit against a third person, by suing in his own name; and he may, by his own intervention, intercept, suspend, or extinguish the right ofthe agent under the contract. Paley Ag. by Lloyd, 362; 7 Taunt. 237, 243; 1 M. & S. 576 1 Liverm. Ag. 226-228; 2 W. C. C. R. 283; 3 Chit. Com. Law, 201-203.

6. - 2d. The principal's rights against third persons. 1. When a contract is made by the agent with a third person in the name of his principal, the latter may enforce it by action.

But to this rule there are some exceptions 1st. When the instrument is under seal, and it has been exclusively made between the agent and the third person; as, for example, a charter party or bottomry bond iii this case the principal cannot sue on it. See 1 Paine, Cir. R. 252; 3 W. C. C. R. 560; 1 M. &. S. 573; Abbott, Ship, pt. 3, c. 1, s. 2. 2d. When an exclusive credit is given to and by the agent, and therefore the principal cannot be considered in any manner a party to the contract, although he may have authorized it, and be entitled to all the benefits arising from it. The case of a foreign factor, buying or selling goods, is an example of this kind: he is treated as between himself and the other party, as the sole contractor, and the real principal cannot sue or be sued on the contract. This, it has been well observed, is a general rule of commercial law, founded upon the known usage of trade; and it is strictly adhered to for the safety and convenience of foreign commerce. Story, Ag. 423; Smith Mer. Law, 66; 15 East, R. 62; 9 B. & C. 87. 3d. When the agent, has a lien or claim upon the property bought or sold, or upon its proceeds, when it equals or exceeds the amount of its value. Story, Ag. 407, 408, 424.

7. - 2. But contracts are not unfrequently made without mentioning the name of the principal; in such case he may avail himself of the agreement, for the contract will be treated as that of the principal, as well as of the agent. Story, Ag. 109, 111, 403, 410, 417, 440; Paley, Ag. by Lloyd, 21, 22; Marsh. Ins. b. 1, c. 8, 3, p. 311; 2 Kent's Com. 3d edit. 630; 3 Chit. Com. Law, 201; vide 1 Paine's C. C. Rep. 252.

8. - 3. Third persons are also liable to the principal for any tort or injury done to his property or rights in the course of the agency. Pal. Ag. by Lloyd, 363; Story, Ag. 436; 3 Chit. Com. Law, 205, 206; 15 East, R. 38. 9. - 2.

 The liabilities of the principal are either to his agent or to third persons.

10. - 1st. The liabilities of the principal to his agent, are, 1. To reimburse him all expenses he may have lawfully incurred about the agency. Story, Ag. 335 Story, Bailm. 196, 197; 2 Liv. Ag. 11 to 33. 2. To pay him his commissions as agreed upon, or according to the usage of trade, except in cases of gratuitous agency. Story, Ag. 323; Story, Bailm. 153, 154, 196 to 201. 3. To indemnify the agent when he has sustained damages in consequence of the principal's conduct for example, when the agent has innocently sold the goods of a third person, under the direction or authority of his principal, and a third person recovers damages against the agent, the latter will be entitled to reimbursement from the principal. Pal. Ag. by Lloyd, 152, 301; 2 John. Cas. 54; 17 John. 142; 14 Pick. 174.11. - 2d. The liabilities of the principal to third persons, are,

1. To fulfii all the engagements made by the agent, for or in the name of the principal, and which come withinthe scope of his authority. Story, Ag. 126.

2. When a man stands by and permits another to do an act in his name, his authority will be presumed. Vide Authority, and 2 Kent, Com. 3d edit. 614; Story, Ag. 89, 90, 91; and articles Assent; Consent.

3. The principal is liable to third persons for the misfeasance, negligence, or omission of duty of his agent; but he has a remedy over against the agent, when the injury has occurred in consequence of his misconduct or culpable neglect; Story, Ag. 308; Paley, Ag. by Lloyd, 152, 3; 1 Metc. 560; 1 B. Mont. 292; 5 B. Monr. 25; 9 W. & S. 72; 8 Pick. 23; 6 Gill & John. 292; 4 Q. B. 298; 1 Hare & Wall. Sel. Dee. 467; Dudl. So. Car. R. 265, 268; 5 Humph. 397; 2 Murph. 389; 1 Ired. 240; but the principal is not liable for torts committed by the agent without authority. 5 Humph. 397; 2 Murph. 389; 19 Wend. 343; 2 Metc. 853. A principal is also liable for the misconduct of a sub-agent, when retained by his direction, either express or implied. 1 B. & P. 404; 15 East,66.

12. The general, rule, that a principal cannot be charged with injuries committed by his agent without his assent, admits of one exception, for reasons of policy.

A sheriff is liable, even under a penal statute, for all injurious acts, wilful or negligent, done by his appointed officers, colore officii, when charged and deputed by him to execute the law. The sheriff is, therefore, liable where his deputy wrongfully executes a writ; Dougl.40; or where he takes illegal fees. 2 E. N. P. C. 585.

13. But the principal may be liable for his agent's misconduct, when he has agreed, either expressly or by implication, to be so liable. 8 T. R . 531; 2 Cas. N. P. C. 42. Vide Bouv. Inst. Index, h. t.; Agency; Agent

I am not responsible for if you think, how you think, what you think or do. You are. If you like my post consider following and up voting. Peace!

---

Interested in joining or supporting the Information War?

Use tag #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.

@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause. 

Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support. 

Delegating Steem Power:  

Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar.  

Delegate 25 SP  

Delegate 50 SP  

Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems. 

How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more:   https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today