5 way? Or their way?

in WORLD OF XPILAR4 months ago


Source

Growing up, the familiar presence of "5 Way" cream jars in our home was intertwined with my father's unique approach to teaching mathematics. He encouraged us, conveying that problem-solving could unfold in numerous ways, beyond the confines of conventional school methods.

Amidst one of those lessons, my eyes kept wandering to the jar sitting in front of me, captivated by its words "5 way". I can still smell that cream's mild fragrance as I write. The cream was initially "5 Way," then it became "7 Way," and I discovered there's even a "9 Way" version online. But in our home, we stuck with the "5 Way" cream.

So yes, we were taught that it's ok to have different approaches towards a problem (mathematics problem to be specific). There is no "one way" to solve these.

It seems our educational system, representing my kids' school, operates differently. My child hesitated to reveal her 6th-grade math test result. Before sharing it with me, she explained her approach. Nevertheless, the following illustrates both her method and her teacher's approach.

The question/ problem is:

Twice a number added to half of itself equals 20. Find the number.

IMG_20240229_120050.jpg

It's interesting to note that even though her answer is correct, she received only 1 out of 5 marks because of a deviation from the expected method. Yes, she did not approach it according to her book. (Ugh... Where did she get those genes???)

I asked her if she knew the L.C.M method, to which she replied yes. When I questioned why she didn't use that method, she responded, "Because, Mama, this one is simpler, and I like it better." — Those adamant genes multiplied by her own ones!

I told her that it's okay to have a different approach, but then you should be prepared for such consequences or results. For me, it's fine; I know you understand your math. However, your teacher has his own evaluation criteria, and I can't go out fighting or engaging in a verbal dispute every time you take a different approach.

"But Mama, I want to come first in class."

"Then you have to think: what's more important, your methods or the teacher's?"


She came to me after some time with a solution. "I will stick to my teacher's method in my final exams. But when I'm practicing at home, I'm allowed to do it my way." I said, "Okay, if that's what you want. I'm with you either way."

How can you not adore a kid like this??? I would love her with all my heart and soul, regardless of whatever decision she makes. I appreciate her approach. This is about not wasting your energy on trivial things. Honestly, arguing with teachers about their supposed techniques or methods is of no use.


In conclusion, navigating the delicate balance between adhering to prescribed methods and fostering individualized approaches to learning can be a challenge. The journey with my child's mathematical exploration has reinforced the importance of understanding the context in which different methods are applied. While it's crucial to respect the guidelines set by teachers, allowing flexibility for personal exploration during practice can be beneficial. As a parent, my unwavering support for my child's choices, coupled with a recognition of the distinct value in diverse problem-solving approaches, underscores the essence of our shared educational experience. Ultimately, it's the holistic development and growth that matter most, fostering a love for learning that extends beyond the confines of rigid methodologies.


Please do share your views on this. I will be waiting for you in the comments :)


microsoft bing

Sort:  

Adorable!

I think as long as she understands both approaches, it's fine.

L.C.M is an important concept that is among the evaluation criteria of her teacher apparently, hence the low marks.

The good news is, it won't matter how she solves the problems in the future (that's when if she doesn't choose Computing as her major later on.) 😉

Posted using SteemPro Mobile

 4 months ago 

Thank you for your reassuring remarks. I agree with you on the point of evaluation criteria, but this teaching approach can demoralize students and eventually lead to disinterest in the subject. However, that is how it is. So let's hope for the best for their future and learning.

 4 months ago 

Only a talented teacher is able to assess the individual approach of the student. I met such teachers when I was still in school. Unfortunately, this is rare. Now, when my child is in school, the teacher's approach is the same as you described. It seems to me that this indicates a low level of teacher, although I could be wrong.

 4 months ago 

I can relate and agree 💯

Encountering such teachers has shaped my approach and fostered "out-of-the-box" thinking.

It's unfortunate that such is not the case with our kids. Let's just hope for the best outcomes for our children's benefit. 🤞

With their inherent brilliance and our support, they're destined to shine brightly.

She did the right thing. Her approach is better than the teachers’ honestly. At the very least she should get full marks for it. Bravo on not following the herd mentality and figuring out the solution in a different way. Keep encouraging her different approach to problem solving that’s a great asset even if not always right.

 4 months ago 

Thank you for your reassuring words. Your experience in teaching mathematics adds great value to your opinion, making it truly invaluable. I find comfort in your thoughtful insights.

Keep encouraging her different approach to problem solving that’s a great asset even if not always right.

That's my approach. 🤞

 4 months ago 

first the system fools the teachers, then the teachers fool the students....
The system does not need a lot of independently thinking people (it is even dangerous). It needs executors who work according to a certain algorithm (instructions). That's exactly what they teach in school.
Keep your child safe from such teachers. From the point of view of normal people, they are pests. But the system needs them.

====================
вначале система оболванивает учителей, потом учителя оболванивают учеников...
Системе не нужно иметь много самостоятельно думающих людей (это даже опасно). Нужны исполнители, которые работают по определённому алгоритму (инструкции). Вот именно этому и учат в школе.
Береги своего ребёнка от таких учителей. С точки зрения нормальных людей, это вредители. Но они нужны системе.

 4 months ago 

Yet another interesting perspective again...
Hmm, do you really think so?

In our situation, the cause might not necessarily be this. I attribute it more to the incompetence of teachers at an individual level. While the system itself has its drawbacks, addressing the specific needs of students demands a holistic approach and effort, something that many teachers and system are unwilling to undertake.

So the easy way out is: sticking to the bookish definitions and methods.

However now at matriculation level, they have reworked the approach, I don't know why - because the teachers are still working on the same old methods. The examination criteria has changed but nothing around it.

I'm venting out again 😋

 4 months ago 

If you do not go deep into the question, then this is the case. The low level of teachers.
But always look for the answer to the question - who benefits from it.

Your post is manually rewarded by the
World of Xpilar Community Curation Trail

STEEM AUTO OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY XPILAR TEAM
https://steemit.com/~witnesses vote xpilar.witness

"Become successful with @wox-helpfund!"
If you want to know more click on the link
https://steemit.com/@wox-helpfund ❤️

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 57849.42
ETH 3122.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43