RE: Photo contest: post processing #5 - Creators of red lines.
I understand everything you say, but I want to convey to you that such an attitude to life can be fatal for many, and for you personally.
Imagine for a second that you, as a public person, and you are a public person, if you blog and express your thoughts, suddenly there will be followers who will believe that if one wolf killed a dog, then you need to kill all the wolves .
Then. a big hunt will begin all over the world, but not for wolves, but for bearers of Russian passports, because their compatriots who came to war in Ukraine behave worse than animals, killing children and the elderly, raping little girls and someone's wives, they deprive people of work and homes, yes, they also kill dogs that were friends for someone.
A few minutes ago, with an interval of a minute, two cruise missiles flew in and exploded a couple of kilometers from my house. You would have shot yourself so as not to hear the cry of my children, who prayed and said goodbye to life, and I just talk to you about the fact that some views in life should be changed.
:) I didn't say that. Why kill all the wolves?
I have only one account for the wolves. A tooth for a tooth and it's more of a formality
I will not comment on what you have written below this quote that I have given. I do not use Ukrainian propaganda as a source of information. At the same time, I will neither confirm nor refute your words. I don't think our blockchain is the right place for such discussions.
I don’t know what you call Ukrainian propaganda, these are just thoughts about real life, about hunters and prey. Even in severe frost, I went into the river for a fallen duck shot by me :)
I'm glad I'm talking to a hunter, not a hunter-athlete :)
Yes, being a shooter-athlete and a hunter-athlete are not the same thing, but they are compatible.
To me, they're just murderers.
Every year, probably since the age of four, I helped my grandfather to roll up cartridges. When one and a half thousand of them gathered, he went to his relatives in the Klyuchevsky region of the Altai Territory. During the season he took about two hundred geese and ducks, these stocks were enough for a year, sometimes more, they shared them with relatives.
To some it will seem like a sport, but without it, it was very difficult to survive there. My grandfather always preferred pigeon to chicken, and when we drove past the grain market, I knew that pigeon would be for dinner. Today, I understand that it is better to buy a chicken, but my grandfather grew up in different conditions, where hunting is practically the only source of food. He considered any bird, lol, except for magpies, ravens and herons, as breakfast, lunch and dinner. :)
Hunting is an ancient craft and it is normal when a man gets his food in this way. He takes as much as he needs for life. And I understand that and I don't see a problem here.
It's another thing when animals are killed for profit, like elephants for their tusks. Or just for sport.
I can't accept that.
I myself went hunting with my father when I was still a schoolboy. Hunting was not a means of subsistence, but animal meat was never superfluous in the family diet. Everything that was mined was always eaten.
So, I thought of the curlews marinated in wine, which murmured so appetizingly in a cauldron with melted duck fat :).
I don't mean shooting at plates on the stand. There are hunters who shoot in the forest as in a shooting gallery... for animals. The same safari, for example.
I meant that I was engaged in sports, bullet shooting, therefore, to some extent, I am a hunter-athlete, but this does not apply to my attitude to the hunting process itself and to game, in particular :).
That's what I'm talking about.
The most important thing is the attitude to the game and for what purpose you picked up a gun.
This applies to any area of life.