You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LEARN AND EARN - our project.hope new awesome initiative

in Project HOPE3 years ago

I wish to point out, comment upvoting could waste a lots of vest in exchange with the amount of $ value sending to the targeted account. There's a reward curve we needed to observed, but I couldn't remember where to find that. In order to topped that reward curve, post reward are suggested to be at 20steem and above, or else the reward curve will be reduced down. Meaning to said, if your account can vote $1.00 at 100% voting weight, voting it on a post with already $3.00 existing, the post will become $4. However, if you vote on a post with $0.00, your $1.00 may turned up like $0.70 or even lower.

I know, it's not about the money. But just to let you know there's so many crappy rules being impose to the HF22.

Some readings from Quara answer:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-updated-reward-pool-distribution-in-Steem-blockchain-It-has-so-many-hardforks-so-what-is-the-latest-updated-reward-pool-distribution

Some complaints:
https://steemit.com/newsteem/@vikisecrets/non-linear-reward-curve-my-votes-are-now-worth-up-to-50-less-after-hf21#@fervi/px1zac

The most convenient way to steal is, steal from the thieves. This non-linear reward curve were introduced to fight dust vote farming, in order to "save" small payout from going out of the reward pool(so the whales can pocket more clean chunks of bigger payout as long they get pay more), and left us who bank less then $4 wonder why have our income suddenly dropped by half.

So, voting on comment literally giving discount to the post reward and wasting more voting power for less effective curation reward.

Sort:  

I wish to point out, comment upvoting could waste a lots of vest in exchange with the amount of $ value sending to the targeted account.

Thanks, but I personally just don't care. :)

I have certain reasons to upvote comments rather often.

I'm pleased to see my comment getting so much of upvote and support. Next best thing I wished for, is a hard fork to do away the reward curve, so to restore to HF21, even better HF20.

So, voting on comment literally giving discount to the post reward and wasting more voting power for less effective curation reward.

Good thing some people don't care! :)

Just kidding. My logic, I'm willing to take a small curation loss for amazing comments like this ;)
Not everyone is willing to sacrifice profit, and it's not my place to say that is right or wrong. I just curate how I choose to.

Thanks Jake. The respect are mutual!

image.png

I swear, when I hit that button for you it was 0.057👿

It's weird. Mine does the same thing.

Thanks to the proposal of HF22. Is there anyway to roll back? Top witness @justyy?

Some people actually only vote comments to sort the comments from most interesting to least interesting... This is how even accounts with high reputation can crash to negative reputation.

Thank you for your comment. It seems assumption based, in that I must not already know this information.

Some people actually only vote comments to sort the comments from most interesting to least interesting...

And what is wrong with that? Some people also like to reward comments on the basis of effort too.
It is far more likely that I will reward comments on the basis of effort, which is my right, because it is my steem power, and now to address:

This is how even accounts with high reputation can crash to negative reputation.

Highly lacking in crucial information. The information you are lacking in, is that this will only happen if someone disagrees with your voting practices, and has the power to crash your reputation.

I see you upvote your own comments, and you didn't care to upvote me, so you'll get no vote from me.

I do appreciate the insight you provided me under assumption based thinking though. Thank you.

There is nothing wrong in "sorting" comments... I was just saying people care more about order of the comments than actual rewards. After the reward structure was changed, it became really hard to get rewards from comments.

What comes to downvoting, it doesn't directly give any rewards, but people do it just for the sake of comment quality. Eventually upvoting better quality comments will give more rewards.

Well stated. I appreciate the clarification.

I have always felt downvoting is very negative, but I cannot deny the merit of its use with this system. It's difficult to define abuse however with vastly different ideas of what is right and wrong. Morality is difficult to assign, as it is more of a perceptual knowing feeling than an ideology.

Have a nice day :)

Downvoting is quite negative if it is done out of malice... When you downvote just because someone else downvoted you first...

I mostly downvote low quality comments made by bots, or people who write low quality posts just because they know enough people will upvote all comments and posts made by high reputation people to get more rewards for themselves, so eventually they also get high reputation faster.

I see why posts dont get engagements

Depends. Post don't get engagements has nothing to do with comment upvotes. Most if not all the time, the author is the root cause of "lacking" in exposure.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.06
JST 0.029
BTC 23329.74
ETH 1667.05
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.69